XPrint: A modularized liquid printer for smart materials deposition

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 5743-5752

  Wang, Guanyun ^a   Yao, Lining ^b   Wang, Wen ^c   Ou, Jifei ^b   Cheng, Chin Yi ^c   Ishii, Hiroshi ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MIT MEDIA LAB   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

3D printing; Functional material printing; Liquid deposition modeling printer; Physical interface; Responsive material printing; Shape changing interface; Smart material interface; Smart material printing

Indexed keywords

3D PRINTERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DEPOSITION; FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTELLIGENT MATERIALS; LIQUIDS; MACHINERY; NATURAL POLYMERS; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; OPEN SYSTEMS; PRINTING; PRINTING MACHINERY; PRINTING PRESSES; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

3-D PRINTING; LIQUID DEPOSITION; PHYSICAL INTERFACE; RESPONSIVE MATERIALS; SMART MATERIAL INTERFACES;

INTERFACES (MATERIALS);

EID: 85015090676     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2858036.2858281     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Agrawal, H., Umapathi, U., Kovacs, R., Frohnhofen, J., Chen, H.-T., Mueller, S., Baudisch, P. 2015. Protopiper: Physically Sketching Room-Sized Objects at Actual Scale. Proc. of UIST 2015, 427-436.
2. Beamish, J. A., Zhu, J., Kottke-Marchant, K., Marchant, R. E. 2010. The effects of monoacrylated poly (ethylene glycol) on the properties of poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels used for tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 92, 441-450.
3. BioBot. Available from: http://www.biobots.io/.
4. Chen, X., Mahadevan, L., Driks, A., Sahin, O. 2014. Bacillus spores as building blocks for stimuliresponsive materials and nanogenerators. Nature nanotechnology 9, 137-141.
5. Fab@home. Available from: http://www.fabathome.org/.
6. Ferris, C. J., Gilmore, K. G., Wallace, G. G. 2013. Biofabrication: an overview of the approaches used for printing of living cells. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 97, 4243-4258.
7. FormLabs. Available from: http://formlabs.com/.
8. Grasshopper. Available from: http://www.grasshopper3d.com/.
9. Hardin, J. O., Ober, T. J., Valentine, A. D., Lewis, J. A. 2015. Microfluidic Printheads for Multimaterial 3D Printing of Viscoelastic Inks. Advanced Materials.
10. Hudson, S. E. 2014. Printing teddy bears: a technique for 3D printing of soft interactive objects. Proc. of CHI 2014, 459-468.
11. Lo, J., Paulos, E. 2014. ShrinkyCircuits: sketching, shrinking, and formgiving for electronic circuits. Proc. of UIST 2014, 291-299.
12. Mironov, V. 2003. Printing technology to produce living tissue. Expert opinion on biological therapy 3, 701.
13. Miruchna, V., Walter, R., Lindlbauer, D., Lehmann, M., von Klitzing, R., Müller, J. 2015. GelTouch: Localized Tactile Feedback Through Thin, Programmable Gel. Proc. of UIST 2015, 3-10.
14. ModularScience. Available from: https://www.modularscience.com/.
15. Mogas-Soldevila, L., Duro-Royo, J., Oxman, N. 2014. Water-Based Robotic Fabrication: Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing of Functionally Graded Hydrogel Composites via Multichamber Extrusion. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 1, 141-151.
16. Moyer, I. E. 2014. A gestalt framework for virtual machine control of automated tools. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
17. Murphy, S. V., Atala, A. 2014. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nature biotechnology 32, 773-785.
18. Muth, J. T., Vogt, D. M., Truby, R. L., Mengüç, Y., Kolesky, D. B., Wood, R. J., Lewis, J. A. 2014. Embedded 3D printing of strain sensors within highly stretchable elastomers. Advanced Materials 26, 6307-6312.
19. Olberding, S., Wessely, M., Steimle, J. 2014. Printscreen: fabricating highly customizable thin-film touch-displays. Proc. of UIST 2014, 281-290.
20. Parsa, S., Gupta, M., Loizeau, F., Cheung, K. C. 2010. Effects of surfactant and gentle agitation on inkjet dispensing of living cells. Biofabrication 2, 025003.
21. Peek, N. 2010. Rapid prototyping of green composites.
22. Rasmussen, M. K., Pedersen, E. W., Petersen, M. G., Hornbæk, K. 2012. Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions. Proc. of CHI 2012, 735-744.
23. Rutzerveld, C. Edible Growth. 2015; Available from: http://www.chloerutzerveld.com/edible-growth-2014.
24. Shi, J., Alves, N. M., Mano, J. F. 2006. Drug Release of pH/Temperature-Responsive Calcium Alginate/Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) Semi-IPN Beads. Macromolecular bioscience 6, 358-363.
25. Sitthi-Amorn, P., Ramos, J. E., Wangy, Y., Kwan, J., Lan, J., Wang, W., Matusik, W. 2015. MultiFab: a machine vision assisted platform for multi-material 3D printing. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 34, 129.
26. Stratasys. Available from: http://www.stratasys.com/3d-printers/design-series.
27. Sun, L., Huang, W. M., Ding, Z., Zhao, Y., Wang, C. C., Purnawali, H., Tang, C. 2012. Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: a review. Materials & Design 33, 577-640.
28. Symes, M. D., Kitson, P. J., Yan, J., Richmond, C. J., Cooper, G. J., Bowman, R. W., Vilbrandt, T., Cronin, L. 2012. Integrated 3D-printed reactionware for chemical synthesis and analysis. Nature Chemistry 4, 349-354.
29. Wilson, W. C., Boland, T. 2003. Cell and organ printing 1: protein and cell printers. The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology 272, 491-496.
30. Yao, L., Ou, J., Cheng, C.-Y., Steiner, H., Wang, W., Wang, G., Ishii, H. 2015. bioLogic: Natto Cells as Nanoactuators for Shape Changing Interfaces. Proc. of CHI 2015, 1-10.
31. Zentoolworks. Available from: http://www.zentoolworks.com/.