THE MERITS OF PUBLIC VERSUS PRIVATE OWNERSHIP: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND SEAPORTS

Economic Papers

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 75-99

  Tull, Malcolm ^a,b   Reveley, James ^a,b  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014912010     PISSN: 08120439     EISSN: 17593441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2001.tb00984.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allport, P. (1998), Natural Monopoly Regulation in New Zealand, Institute of Public Affairs Deregulation Conference, Melbourne, 24 July 1998.
2. Bush, G. (1995), Local Government and Politics in New Zealand, Auckland University Press, Auckland.
3. Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia (1998), Policy Paper on Waterfront Reform (Containerised Stevedoring), Perth.
4. Commonwealth Department of Transport and Regional Services (2000), The Commonwealth's transport directions. Task and outlook, Canberra.
5. Cumming, W. (1977), An Economic Appraisal of Australian Port Administration, CEDA Monograph Series, No. 48.
6. Everett, S. and R. Robinson (1998), Port Reform in Australia: Issues in the Ownership Debate, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41–62.
7. First New Zealand Capital (1997), New Zealand Ports: From the Crow's Nest.
8. Gómez-Ibáñez, J. and J. Meyer (1993), Going Private: The International Experience With Transport Privatization, The Brookings Institute, Washington DC.
9. Goss, R. (1982), National Port Policies, in L. Baudez (ed.), Haven en Vervoer in de Hedendaagse Economic, E. Van de Voorde, Antwerp.
10. Goss, R. (1990a), Economic Policies and Seaports: 1. The Economic Functions of Seaports, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 207–219.
11. Goss, R. (1990b), Economic Policies and Seaports: 2. The Diversity of Port Policies, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 221–234.
12. Goss, R. (1990c), Economic Policies and Seaports: 4. Strategies for Port Authorities, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 273–287.
13. Griffin, G. and Svensen, S. (1998), Industrial Relations Implications of the Australian Waterside Dispute, Australian Bulletin of Labour, Vol. 24, September, pp. 194–206.
14. Hoffman, J., Concentration in Liner Shipping: Its Causes and Impacts for Ports and Shipping Services in Developing Regions, ELAC, http:www.eclac.clenglishresearchdcitflcg2027contents.htm Accessed 29 April 1999.
15. Jackson Valentine Business Partners (1998), Major Ports Study For NZ Shipping Federation: Analysis of 1997 Financial Results, March.
16. Kearney, C. (1991), in J. Niland, W. Brown and B. Hughes, Breaking New Ground: Enterprise Bargaining and Agency Agreements for the Australian Public Service. A Report Prepared for the Australian Minister for Industrial Relations, Canberra, AGPS.
17. KPMG (1998), Ports: A Fresh Look at New Zealand Ports 1998, Wellington.
18. KPMG (1999), Ports: A Fresh Look at New Zealand Ports 1999, Wellington.
19. Martin, G. (1995), The Port of Brisbane Corporation: A Case Study in Corporatisation, Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 53–67.
20. Meyrick and Associates (1998), Measures to Promote Effective and Efficient Container Port Practices. Final Report prepared for the Marine and Ports Group of the Australian Transport Council.
21. Ministry of Transport (1984), Onshore Costs Study, Wellington.
22. New Zealand Business Roundtable/Federated Farmers of New Zealand (1989), Ports and Shipping Reform in New Zealand: Current Developments and Future Requirements.
23. New Zealand Shipping Federation (1998), Ports and Port Services, Paper to New Zealand Shipping Conference, 28-29 May 1998.
24. New Zealand Transport Commission (1967), New Zealand Ports: A Statistical and General Description, Wellington.
25. NZIER/Ernst and Young (1989), Ports of New Zealand: Review of regulatory issues, Volume 1.
26. OECD (1999), Economic Surveys 1998-99, Australia.
27. Pooch, V. (1999), 1998 Ports Study for NZ Shipowners Federation, Key Business Partners Limited, April.
28. Port Companies Working Group (1998), Proposal for Port Company Reform, September, Wellington.
29. Port Nelson Ltd v Commerce Commission (1996), New Zealand Law Reports, 3.
30. Ports of Auckland Limited, Annual Report 1998.
31. Productivity Commission (1998), International benchmarking of the Australian waterfront, Melbourne.
32. Reveley, J. (1997), Waterfront Labour Reform in New Zealand: Pressures, Processes and Outcomes, Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 39, no. 3, September, pp. 369–387.
33. Reveley, J. (1999), From “Supplementary Seagulls” to “Cut Price Casuals”: Changing Patterns of Casual Employment on the New Zealand Waterfront 1951-1997, Labour and Industry, Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–56.
34. Saundry, R. and P. Turnbull (1996), Mêlee on the Mersey: Contracts, Competition and Labour Relations on the Docks, Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 275–288.
35. Saundry, R. and P. Turnbull (1997), Private Profit, Public Loss: The Financial and Economic Performances of U.K. Ports, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 319–334.
36. Selsky, J. and P. Memon (1999), Institutional Arrangements and Emergent Commons: Comparative Dynamics in Urban Port Domains, Paper presented at Workshop on Interorganisational Collaboration, University of Melbourne, 15-16 December.
37. Sproule-Jones, M. (199091), Managing New Zealand's Ports, Local Authority Management, Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 5–7.
38. Steering Committee on National Performance Monitoring of Government Trading Enterprises (1998), Government trading enterprises performance indicators 1991-1992 to 1996-97, Volume 1, AGPS, Canberra.
39. Stretton, H. and L. Orchard (1994), Public Goods, Public Enterprise, Public Choice: Theoretical Foundations of the Contemporary Attack on Government, The Macmillan Press Ltd, Houndmills.
40. Taylor, R. N. (1999), Ports Study. Prepared on behalf of the New Zealand Port Companies, April.
41. Trebeck, D. (1999), Port Reform Without Tears - the New Zealand Experience, Economic Affairs, Vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 23–30.
42. Trebeck, D. and P. Barnard (1990), Ports and Trans-Tasman Shipping, in K. Vantier, J. Farmer and R. Baxt (eds), CER and Business Competition, Commerce Clearing House, Auckland.
43. Tull, M. (1997), The Fremantle Port Authority: A Case Study in Microeconomic Reform, Economic Papers, Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 33–53.
44. Turnbull, P. (1992), Waterfront Reform in Britain and Australia — In Practice and In Principle, Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 34, no. 2, June, pp. 229–246.
45. Union Shipping NZ Ltd v Port Nelson Ltd (1990), New Zealand Law Reports, 2, pp. 662.
46. Vazey, G. (1998), Chief Executive of Ports of Auckland Limited, “Not with a bang…” MUA—Here to Stay … Today! Proceedings of the XIXth H. R. Nicholls Society Conference, August, http:www.hrnicholls.com.aunichollsnichvo19Vazey.html.
47. Wilkes, C. (1993), The State as Historical Subject, in B. Roper and C. Rudd (eds), State and Economy in New Zealand, Oxford University Press, Auckland.
48. Westgate Transport Ltd v Methanex New Zealand Ltd (1998), Judgment of Potter J on Application for Interim Injunction, High Court of New Zealand, C.P. 93/98, June.