The dynamic ‘diamond’: A technological innovation perspective

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 183-200

  Utterback, James M ^a   Afuah, Allan N ^b  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominant design; Local environment; Technological evolution; Uncertainty resolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014885220     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438599800000019     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abernathy, W. J., and Utterback, J.M., 1978. Patterns of Innovation in Technology. Technology Review., 80 (7) June-July: 40–47.
2. Afuah, A. N., and Bahram, N., 1995. The Hypercube of Innovation. Research Policy, 24: 51–76.
3. Allen, T., 1984. Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Antonelli, C., 1995. TIE Economics of Localized Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Arthur, B., 1989. Conlpeting Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-in by Historical Events. Economic Journal, 99: 116–131.
6. Borrus, M., 1988. Competing for Control: America's Stake in Microelectronics, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
7. Burgelman, R. A., 1994. Fading Memories: The Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 39: 24–56.
8. Clark, K. B., 1985. The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and Market Concepts in Technological Evolution. Research Policy., 14: 235–251.
9. Clark, K. B., 1989. Project Scope and Project Performance: The Effects of Parts Strategy and Supplier Involvement on Product Development. Management Science, 35 (10): 1247–1263.
10. Clark, K. B, and Fujumoto, T., 1991. “ Product Development Performance: Slraregy ”. In Orgonization, and Management in the world automobile industry, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School press.
11. David, P. A., 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75 (2): 332–336.
12. Dorfman, N. S., 1987. lnnovarion and Market Structure: Lessons from the Semiconductor and Computer Industries, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
13. Freeman, C., 1982. Thc Economics of Industrial Innovation, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
14. Freeman, J., Thoughts in a seminar given at MIT. Federal Reserve Bank.
15. Garud, R., and Kumaraswamy, A., 1993. Changing Competitive Dynamics in Network Industries: An Exploration of Sun Microsystems' Open Systems Strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 351–369.
16. Geroski, P., 1995. “ Markets for Technology: Knowledge, Innovation and Appropriability ”. In Handbook of Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Edited by: Stoneman, P. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
17. Helper, S. (1987) Supplier Relations and Technical Change: Theoly and Application to the US Automobile Industry. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
18. ICE. 1995. Status 1995: A Report on the Integrated Circuit Industry, Scottsdale, AZ: Integrated Circuit Engineering.
19. Katz, M. L., and Shapiro., C., 1985. Network externalities, competition and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75 (3): 424–440.
20. Khazam, J, and Mowery, D., 1994. Commercialization of RISC: Strategies for the creating of dominant designs. Research Policy, 23: 89–102.
21. Kim, L., 1997. Limitation to Innovation: the Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Porter, M.E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press.
23. Roberts, E. B., 199I. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Roberts, E. B., 1979. Stimulating Technological Innovation Organizational approaches. Research Management, 6
25. Saxenian, A., 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Thomas, L. G. (1989) Spare the rod and Spoil the Industry: Vigorous Competition and Vigorous Regulation Promote Global Competitive Advantage: A Ten Nation Study of Government Industrial Policies and Corporate Pharmaceutical Advantage. Working Paper, Columbia Business School.
27. Tushman, M. L., and Rosenkopf, L., 1992. Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a sociology of Technological Evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior., 14: 311–347.
28. Tushman, M. L., and Anderson, P., 1986. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science quarterly, 31: 439–465.
29. Utterback, J. M., 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
30. Utterback, J. M. and A. Murray (1977) Influence of Defense Procurement and Sponsorship of Research and Development of Civilian Electronics Industry. Working Paper, MIT.
31. Von Hippel, E., 1988. The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
32. von Hippel, E., 1986. Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, 32 (7) July: 791–805. 1986
33. Wilson, R. W., Ashton, P.K., and P. Egan, T., 1980. Innovation, Competition and Government Policy in the Semiconductor Industry, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.