Understanding changes in tumor texture indices in PET: A comparison between visual assessment and index values in simulated and patient data

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 387-392

  Orlhac, Fanny ^a   Nioche, Christophe ^a   Soussan, Michael ^a,b   Buvat, Irene ^a  

^a DIF   (France)

^b AVICENNE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Oncology; PET; Texture analysis; Tumor heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTROPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; ONCOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; PATIENT CODING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; AGED; ALGORITHM; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85014836808     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: 2159662X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181859     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alic L, Niessen WJ, Veenland JF. Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110300
2. Fisher R, Pusztai L, Swanton C. Cancer heterogeneity: implications for targeted therapeutics. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:479-485
3. Galavis PE, Hollensen C, Jallow N, Paliwal B, Jeraj R. Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:1012-1016
4. Yan J, Lim JC-S, Loi HY, et al. Impact of image reconstruction settings on texture features in 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1667-1673
5. Orlhac F, Soussan M, Maisonobe J-A, Garcia CA, Vanderlinden B, Buvat I. Tumor texture analysis in 18F-FDG PET: relationships between texture parameters, histogram indices, standardized uptake values, metabolic volumes, and total lesion glycolysis. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:414-422
6. Leijenaar RTH, Nalbantov G, Carvalho S, et al. The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11075
7. Orlhac F, Soussan M, Chouahnia K, Martinod E, Buvat I. 18F-FDG PET-derived textural indices reflect tissue-specific uptake pattern in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145063
8. Brooks FJ, Grigsby PW. The effect of small tumor volumes on studies of intratumoral heterogeneity of tracer uptake. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:37-42
9. Chalkidou A, O'Doherty MJ, Marsden PK. False discovery rates in PET and CT studies with texture features: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124165
10. Buvat I, Orlhac F, Soussan M. Tumor texture analysis in PET: where do we stand J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1642-1644
11. Soussan M, Orlhac F, Boubaya M, et al. Relationship between tumor heterogeneity measured on FDG-PET/CT and pathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94017
12. Nestle U, Kremp S, Schaefer-Schuler A, et al. Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1342-1348
13. Tixier F, Hatt M, Valla C, et al. Visual versus quantitative assessment of intratumor 18F-FDG PET uptake heterogeneity: prognostic value in non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1235-1241
14. Gebejes A, Huertas R. Texture characterization based on grey-level co-occurrence matrix. Proc Conf Inform Manag Sci. 2013;3:375-378
15. Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:369-378
16. Orlhac F, Thézé B, Soussan M, Boisgard R, Buvat I. Multiscale texture analysis: from 18F-FDG PET images to histologic images. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1823-1828
17. Dong X, Xing L, Wu P, et al. Three-dimensional positron emission tomography image texture analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: relationship between tumor 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake heterogeneity, maximum standardized uptake value, and tumor stage. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34:40-46
18. Xu R, Kido S, Suga K, et al. Texture analysis on 18F-FDG PET/CT images to differentiate malignant and benign bone and soft-tissue lesions. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:926-935
19. Hatt M, Majdoub M, Vallières M, et al. 18F-FDG PET uptake characterization through texture analysis: investigating the complementary nature of heterogeneity and functional tumor volume in a multi-cancer site patient cohort. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:38-44
20. Doumou G, Siddique M, Tsoumpas C, Goh V, Cook GJ. The precision of textural analysis in 18F-FDG-PET scans of oesophageal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:2805-2812
21. Nyflot MJ, Yang F, Byrd D, Bowen SR, Sandison GA, Kinahan PE. Quantitative radiomics: impact of stochastic effects on textural feature analysis implies the need for standards. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015;2:041002
22. Tixier F, Hatt M, Le Rest CC, Le Pogam A, Corcos L, Visvikis D. Reproducibility of tumor uptake heterogeneity characterization through textural feature analysis in 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:693-700
23. Leijenaar RTH, Carvalho S, Velazquez ER, et al. Stability of FDG-PET radiomics features: an integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:1391-1397
24. Hatt M, Tixier F, Cheze Le Rest C, Pradier O, Visvikis D. Robustness of intratumour 18F-FDG PET uptake heterogeneity quantification for therapy response prediction in oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1662-1671
25. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278:563-577
26. Rajkumar V, Goh V, Siddique M, et al. Texture analysis of 125I-A5B7 anti-CEA antibody SPECT differentiates metastatic colorectal cancer model phenotypes and anti-vascular therapy response. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1882-1887.