The discipline as disciplinary normalization: Networks of research

New Political Science

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 345-363

  Luke, Timothy W ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014751759     PISSN: 07393148     EISSN: 14699931     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07393149908429876     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barnes, Barry, and Bloor, David. 1982. “Realism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge,”. In Rationality and Relativism, Edited by: Hollis, Martin, and Lukes, Steven. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Lynch, Michael. 1997. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, 10Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Agger, Ben. 1989. Reading Science: A Literary, Political, and Sociological Analysis, Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
5. Easton, David. 1971. The Political System: An Enquiry into the State of Political Science, 94Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Almond, Gabriel. 1988. “Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science,”. Political Science & Politics, XX (4): 828–892.
7. Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France, 216–226. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action, 5526Stanford: Stanford University Press.
10. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action, 257Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Luke, Timothy W., 1991. “The Discourse of Development: A Genealogy of ‘Developing Nations’ and the Discipline of Modernity,”. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 11: 271–293.
12. 1989. “Political Science and the Discourses of Power: Developing a Genealogy of the Political Culture Concept,”. History of Political Thought, X (1): 125–149.
13. 1987. “Methodological Individualism: The Essential Ellipsis of Rational Choice Theory,”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 17 (2): 341–355.
14. 1985. “Reason and Rationality in Rational Choice Theory,”. Social Research, 52 (1): 65–98.
15. Zwick, Peter. 1992. “Mainstreaming Political Science Instruction: An Additive Approach,”. Political Science & Politics, XXV (4): 714–717.
16. Miller, Arthur H., Tien, Charles, and Peebler, Andrew A., 1996. “The American Political Science Review Hall of Fame: Assessments and Implications for an Evolving Discipline,”. Political Science & Politics, XXIX (1): 73
17. Garard, James C., 1990. “An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations,”. Political Science & Politics, XXIII: 444–451.
18. Miller, Tien, and Peebler. “Hall of Fame,”. 73 op. cit.
19. Patterson, Samuel, and Smithey, Shannon K., 1990. “Monitoring Scholarly Journal Publication in Political Science: The Role of the APSR,”. Political Science & Politics, XXIII (4): 656
20. Miller, Tien, and Peebler. “Hall of Fame,”. 78 op. cit.
21. Crewe, Ivor, and Norris, Pippa. 1991. “British and American Journal Evaluation: Divergence or Convergence,”. Political Science & Politics, XXIV (3): 526
22. Ricci, David. The Tragedy of Political Science 209–248. op. cit.
23. Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination, 76–118. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish, 177New York: Vintage.
25. Somit, Albert. 1992. “From Professor of Political Science to Professor Emeritus,”. Political Science & Politics, XXV (6): 719
26. Foucault. Discipline and Punish 180 op. cit.
27. Patterson and Smithey. “Monitoring Scholarly Publication,”. 652 op. cit.
28. Miller, Tien, and Peebler. “Hall of Fame,”. 74 op. cit.
29. Miller, Arthur H., Tien, Charles, and Peebler, Andrew A., 1996. “Department Rankings: An Alternative Approach. Political Science & Politics, XXIX (4): 709–710.
30. 1995. “Ranking Research Doctoral Programs in Political Science,”. Political Science & Politics, XXVIII (4): 734–737.
31. Miller, Tien, and Peebler. “Department Rankings,”. 714–716. op. cit.
32. Almond. “Separate Tables,”. 34–36. op. cit.
33. Almond, Gabriel. 1990. “The Nature of Contemporary Political Science: A Roundtable Discussion,”. Political Science & Politics, XXIII (1): 35
34. Almond, Gabriel. 1996. “Political Science: The History of the Discipline,”. In A New Handbook of Political Science, Edited by: Goodin, Robert, and Klingemann, Hans‐Dieter. 51Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Almond. “Political Science: The History,”. 8450 op. cit.
36. Easton. Political System 94 op. cit.
37. Pinch, Trevor J., and Bijker, Wiebe E., 1987. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other,”. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Edited by: Bijker, W., Hughes, T., and Pinch, T., 1750Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Goodin, Robert, and Klingemann, Hans‐Dieter. 1996. A New Handbook of Political Science, 3–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Agger, Ben. 1990. The Decline of Discourse: Reading, Writing, and Resistance in Postmodern Capitalism, New York: Falmer Press.
40. Lowi, Theodore J., 1992. “The State of Political Science: How We Become What We Study,”. American Political Science Review, 86 March: 1–7.
41. Jacoby, Russell. 1994. Dogmatic Wisdom, New York: Free Press.