Silence reigns! A communitarian critique of the ethics of Lawrence Kohlberg

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 5-13

  Sigurdson, Ola ^a  

^a NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014743097     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0031383970410101     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Benhabib, S., 1992. Situating the Self: gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics, New York: Routledge.
2. Gilligan, C., 1993. In a Different Voice: psychological theory and women's development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Habermas, J., 1983. Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
4. Habermas, J., 1991a. “ Lawrence Kohlberg und der Neoaristotelismus ”. In Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik Edited by: Habermas, J., 77–99.
5. Habermas, J., ed. 1991b. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
6. Hauerwas, S., 1981. “ Character, narrative, and growth in the Christian life ”. In A Community of Character: towards a constructive Christian social ethic, Edited by: Hauerwas, S., 129–152. 268–276. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
7. Kohlberg, L., 1971. “ From is to ought: how to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development ”. In Cognitive Development and Epistemology, Edited by: Mischel, T., 151–232. New York: Academic Press.
8. Kohlberg, L., 1981a. “ Indoctrination versus relativity in value education ”. In Essays on Moral Development Vol. I, The Philosophy of Moral Development: moral stages and the idea of justice, Edited by: Kohlberg, L., 6–28. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
9. Kohlberg, L., 1981b. “ From is to ought: how to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development ”. In Essays on Moral Development, Vol. I, The Philosophy of Moral Development: moral stages and the idea of justice, Edited by: Kohlberg, L., 101–189. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
10. Kohlberg, L., 1981c. “ The future of liberalism as the dominant ideology of the Western world ”. In Essays on Moral Development, Vol. I, The Philosophy of Moral Development: moral stages and the idea of justice, Edited by: Kohlberg, L., 231–242. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
11. Kohlberg, L., 1981d. Essays on Moral Development, Vol. I, The Philosophy of Moral Development: moral stages and the idea of justice, San Francisco: Harper & Row.
12. Kohlberg, L., 1984a. “ Moral stages and moralization: the cognitive-developmental approach ”. In Essays on Moral Development, Vol. II, The Psychology of Moral Development: the nature and validity of moral stages, 170–205. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
13. Kohlberg, L., 1984b. “ Appendix A: the six stages of justice judgment ”. In Essays on Moral Development, Vol. II, The Psychology of Moral Development: the nature and validity of moral stages, 621–639. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
14. Kohlberg, L., and Mayer, R., 1981. “ Development as the aim of education: the Dewey view ”. In Essays on Moral Development, Vol. II, The Philosophy of Moral Development: the nature and validity of moral stages, Edited by: Kohlberg, L., 49–96. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
15. Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., and Hewer, A., 1984a. “ The current formulation of the theory ”. In Essays on Moral Development, Vol. II, The Psychology of Moral Development: the nature and validity of moral stages, Edited by: Kohlberg, L., 212–319. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
16. Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., and Hewer, A., 1984b. “ Synopses and detailed replies to critics ”. In Essays on Moral Development, Vol. II, The Psychology of Moral Development: the nature and validity of moral stages, Edited by: Kohlberg, L., 320–386. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
17. Lapsley, D.K., 1992. “ Pluralism, virtues, and the post-Kohlbergian era in moral psychology ”. In The Challenge of Pluralism: education, politics, and values, Edited by: Power, F.C., and Lapsley, D.K., 169–199. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
18. MacIntyre, A., 1985. After Virtue: a study in moral theory, 2nd edn, London: Duckworth.
19. MacIntyre, A., 1988. Whose Justice? Which rationality?, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
20. MacIntyre, A., 1990. Three Rival Versions of Moral Enqiry: encyclopaedia, genealogy, andtradition, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
21. MacIntyre, A., 1994a. “ Nietzsche or Aristotle? Alasdair MacIntyre ”. In The American Philosopher: conversations with Quine, Davidson, Putnam, Nozick, Danto, Rorty, Cavell, MacIntyre, and Kuhn, Edited by: Borradori, G., 137–152. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
22. MacIntyre, A., 1994b. “ A partial response to my critics ”. In After MacIntyre: critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre, Edited by: Horton, J., and Mendus, S., 283–304. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Peters, R.S., 1981. Moral Development and Moral Education, London: George Allen & Unwin.
24. Rawls, J., 1972. A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Sandel, M.J., 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Stout, J., 1988. Ethics after Babel: the languages of morals and their discontents, Boston: Beacon Press.
27. Taylor, C., 1989. Sources of the Self: the making of the modem identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Walzer, M., 1983. Spheres of Justice: a defense of pluralism and equality, New York: Basic Books.