First–person plural legislature: Political reflexivity and representation*

Philosophical Explorations

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 235-250

  van Roermund, Bert ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014726936     PISSN: 13869795     EISSN: 17415918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10002003098538752     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bratman, M.E. (1983), “Castañedas Theory of Thought and Action”, in Agent, Language and the Structure of the World. Essays presented to H.-N. Castañeda, with his replies, J. Tomberlin (ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company: 149-169.
2. Bratman, M.E. (1999), Faces of Intention. Selected Essays on Intention and Agency, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
3. Feinberg, J. (1984-1988), The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law; vol. I: Harm to Others, New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Castañeda, H.-N. (1966), “‘He’: a Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness”, Ratio 8, 130-157.
5. Castañeda, H.-N. (1967), “Indicators and Quasi-indicators”, American Philosophical Quarterly 4, 85100.
6. Castañeda, H.-N. (1975), Thinking and Doing, the Philosophal Foundations of Institutions, Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.
7. Castañeda, H.-N. (1989), Thinking, Language and Experience, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Castañeda, H.-N. (1990), Intentionality, Modality and Supervenience, ed. by M.J. van den Hoven and G.J.C. Lokhorst, Rotterdam: Faculteit der Wijsbegeerte.
9. Feinberg, Joel. (1984), The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. I, Harm to Others. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Habermas, J. (1992), Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. 2. Aufl., Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
11. Hobbes, Th., (1651), Leviathan. Jacobi, Kl. – H. Pape (Hrsg.), Das Denken und die Struktur der Welt. Castañedas epistemologische Ontologie in Darstellung und Kritik, Berlin: De Gruyter, 1989.
12. Kelsen, H. (1926), “Zur Soziologie der Demokratie”, in Die Wiener Rechtstheoretische Schule, H. Kelsen, A. Merkl, et al. (1968), Wien etc.: Europa Verlag – Salzburg etc.: Universitätsverlag A. Pustet, 2 Bd., 1729-1741.
13. Kelsen, H. (1927), “Demokratie”, in Die Wiener Rechtstheoretische Schule, H. Kelsen, A. Merkl, et al. (1968), Wien etc.: Europa Verlag – Salzburg etc.: Universitätsverlag A. Pustet, 2 Bd., 1743-1776.
14. Lagerspetz, E. (2001), “Collective Intentions, Legislative Intents and Social Choice”, in Pluralism and the Law, A. Soeteman (ed.), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 375-385.
15. Lefort, Cl. (1986), Essais sur le politique, XIXe-Xxe siècles, Paris: Du Seuil.
16. Lindahl, H.K. (2000), “European Integration: Popular Sovereignty and a Politics of Boundaries”, in European Law Journal 6, 239-256.
17. Montesquieu, Ch. ([1748] 1979), De l’Esprit des Lois (2 vols.). Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.
18. Perry, J. (1998), “Myself and I”, in Philosophie in synthetischer Absicht (Festschrift D. Henrich), M. Stamm (ed.), Stuttgart: Clett-Cotta, 83-103.
19. Raz, J. (1986), The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Ricoeur, P. (1990), Soi-même Comme un Autre, Paris: Du Seuil.
21. Rousseau, J.-J., (1762), Du Contrat Social ou Principes du Droit Politique. Amsterdam: Rey.
22. Tomberlin, J.E. (ed.) (1986), Hector-Neri Castañeda (Profiles, 6), Dordrecht etc.: Reidel.
23. Waldenfels, B. (1994), Antwortregister, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
24. Waldenfels, B. (2001), Verfremdung der Moderne. Phänomenologische Grenzgänge, Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.
25. Walker, N. (2002), “The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism”, in The Modern Law Review 65, 317-359.
26. Walker, N. (2003), “Late Sovereignty”, in Sovereignty in Transition, N. Walker (ed.), Oxford, Hart Publ. (forthcoming).
27. Witte, B. de (1998), “Sovereignty and European Integration: the Weight of Legal Tradition”, in The European Court and National Courts: Doctrines and Jurisprudence, A.M. Slaughter, A. Stone Sweet, J.H.H. Weiler (eds.), Oxford: Hart. Publ., 277-304.