What is a participatory design result?

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 1, Issue , 2016, Pages 141-150

  Bratteteig, Tone ^a   Wagner, Ina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Participatory design; Participatory design result; Power to

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

KNOW-THAT; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; POWER-TO;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

EID: 85014711684     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2940299.2940316     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (56)

1. Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. 1975. Power and its two faces revisited - a reply to Geofrey Debham. The American Political Science Review, 69, 3: 900-904.
2. Balka, E., Bjørn, P., and Wagner, I. 2008. Steps Toward a Typology for Health Informatics. In Proceedings of CSCW 2008 (San Diego, USA), ACM, New York, 515-524.
3. Balka, E. 2010. Broadening Discussion about Participatory Design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 22, 1: 77-84.
4. Bansler, J. 1989. Systems development research in Scandinavia: three theoretical schools. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 1, 9: 3-20.
5. Bansler, J. and Kraft. 1994. The Collective Resource Approach: The Scandinavian Experience. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 6, 1.
6. Bergold, J. and Thomas, S. 2012. Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 191-222.
7. Binder, T., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., De Michelis, G., Linde, P., & Wagner, I. 2011. Design Things. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
8. Bittner, E. 1973. Objectivity and realism in sociology. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Phenomenological Sociology: Issues and Applications. New York: Wiley, 109-125.
9. Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. 1987. Perspectives on description tools and techniques in system development, Docherty et al (eds): System Design for Human Development and Productivity: Participation and Beyond, North-Holland, Amsterdam: 319-330.
10. Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T.1988. Computers-utensils or epaulets? The application perspective revisited. AI & Society, 2, 3: 258-266.
11. Bjerknes, G and Bratteteig, T. 1995. User participation and democracy: A discussion of Scandinavian research on system development. Scandinavian Journal of information systems 7, 1: 258-266.
12. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, P-A. 2012. Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign, 8, 2-3: 127-144.
13. Blomberg, J., Suchman, L., and Trigg, R. 1996. Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project. Human-Computer-Interaction, 11, 3: 237-266.
14. Bohøj, M., Borchorst, N.G., Bouvin, N.O., Bødker, S. and Zander, P-O. 2010. Timeline collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, 523-532.
15. Bødker, S. and Zander, P-O. 2015. Participation in design between public sector and local communities. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, ACM, New York, 49-58.
16. Bossen, C., Dindler, C., and Iversen, O.S. 2010. User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project." In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, ACM, New York, 141-150.
17. Bratteteig, T. and Wagner, I. 2016 (in press). Unpacking the notion of participation in Participatory Design, Journal of CSCW.
18. Bratteteig, T. and Wagner, I. 2014. Disentangling Participat-ion. Power and Decision-making in Participatory Design, Springer Verlag CSCW series.
19. Bratteteig, T. and Wagner, I. 2014. Design decisions and the sharing of power in PD. In Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference II (PDC'14): 29-32
20. Druin, A. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology, 21: 1-25.
21. Dahl, R. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2: 201-15.
22. Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. 1986. A tool perspective on design of interactive computer support for skilled workers. DAIMI Report Series 14.190.
23. Ehn, P. 1990. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Lawrence Erlbaum Publ.
24. Floyd, C. 1987. Outline of a Paradign Change in Software Engineering. In Bjerknes, G; Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. (eds). Computers and Democracy. A Scandinavian Challenge Avebury, Aldershot: 191-210.
25. Foucault, M. 1972. The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 4: 777-795.
26. Gärtner, J. and Wagner, I. 1996. Mapping actors and agendas: political frameworks of systems design and participation. Human-Computer Interaction Journal, 11, 3: 187-214.
27. Graffiti no 7: Alternatives in text and image, 1984. The Utopia project.
28. Haugaard, M. 2012. Rethinking the four dimensions of power: domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Review 5, 1: 33-54.
29. Hayes, G. R. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 18, 3: 15.
30. Joshi, S. and Bratteteig, T. 2016 (in press). Design for Prolonged Mastery. On Involving Old People in Participatory Design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems.
31. Kaasbøll, J. 1983. The Research Programme SYDPOL: SYstem Development environment and Profession Oriented Languages, Nordforsk Publikationnserie 1983:2, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo.
32. Kanstrup, AM. and Christiansen, E. 2006. Selecting and evoking innovators: combining democracy and creativity. Proceedings of NordiCHI, 321-330.
33. Kensing, F. and Greenbaum, J. (2012). Heritage: having a say. In J. Simonsen and T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. London/New York, Routledge: 21-37.
34. Kyng, M. 1991. Designing for cooperation: cooperating in design. Communications of the ACM, 34, 12: 65-73.
35. Kyng, M. 2010. Bridging the Gap Between Politics and Techniques: On the next practices of participatory design, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 22, 1: 49-68.
36. Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View. London, Macmillan.
37. Martin, D., Mariani, J. and Rouncefield, M. 2009. Practicali-ties of participation: Stakeholder involvement in an electron-ic patient records project. Configuring User-Designer Relations. Springer London: 133-155.
38. Mathiassen, L., Rolskov, B. and Vedel, E. 1983. Regulating the Use of EDP by Law and Agreements. In Briefs, U., Ciborra, C. and Schneider, L. (eds). Systems Design For, With, and By the Users, North-Holland, Amsterdam: 251-264.
39. Nygaard, K. 1992. How Many Choices Do We Make? How Many Are Difficult. In: Floyd et al (eds.) Proceedings from Software Development and Reality Construction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 52-59
40. Nygaard, K. 1996. "Those were the days" - or "heroic times are here again". Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 8, 2: 91-108.
41. Nygaard, K. and Bergo, O.T. 1975. The trade unions-New users of research. Personnel Review, 4, 2: 5-10.
42. Nygaard, K. and Fjalestad, J. (1981): Group Interests and Participation in Information Systems Development, Microelectronics, Productivity and Employment, Paris: OECD.
43. Pansardi, P. 2012. Power to and power over: two distinct concepts of power? Journal of Political Power, 5, 1: 73-89.
44. Pedersen, J. 2007. Protocols of research and design. Reflections on a participatory design project (sort of). (PhD thesis), IT University, Copenhagen.
45. Pitkin, H.F. 1972. Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought. Berkeley, CA. University of California Press.
46. Robertson, T. and Wagner, I. 2012. Ethics: Engagement, representation and politics-in-action. In J. Simonsen & T. Robertson (Eds.) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. London/New York: Routledge: 64-85.
47. Robertson, T., Leong, T. W., Durick, J., and Koreshoff, T. 2014. Mutual learning as a resource for research design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference, Volume 2, ACM, New York: 25-28.
48. Rodwell, C.M. 1996. An analysis of the concept of empow-erment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 2: 305-313.
49. Ruland, C. M., Starren, J. and Vatne, Trun, M. 2008. Participatory design with children in the development of a support system for patient-centered care in pediatric oncology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 41, 4: 624-635.
50. Shapiro, D. 2010. A Modernised Participatory Design? A response to Kyng. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 22, 1: 69-76.
51. Stahl, B.C. 2007. ETHICS, morality and critique: An essay on Enid Mumford's socio-technical approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8, 9: 479-490.
52. Stevens, G., Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. 2010. Appropriation infrastructure: mediating appropriation and production work. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC) 22.2: 58-81.
53. Strauss, A. 1979. Negotiations. Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Berkeley, CA. University of California Press.
55. Whyte, W.F. (ed) 1991. Participatory Action Research, Beverly Hills: Sage.
56. Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Chivuno-Kuria, S., Koch Kapuire, G., Bidwell, N.J. and Blake, E. 2010. Being participated: a community approach. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, ACM, New York: 1-10.