Naturalism and the problem of moral knowledge

Southern Journal of Philosophy

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 575-597

  Huemer, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014625143     PISSN: 00384283     EISSN: 20416962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2000.tb00916.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ball, Stephen., 1988. Reductionism in ethics and science: A contemporary look at G. E. Moore’s open question argument. American Philosophical Quarterly 25: 197-212.
2. Ball, Stephen., 1991. Linguistic intuitions and varieties of ethical naturalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51: 1-38.
3. Boyd, Richard., 1988. How to be a moral realist. In Essays on Moral Realism, ed. Geoffrey Sayre-McCord (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 181-228.
4. Darwall, Stephen., Allan, Gibbard., and Peter, Railton., 1992. Toward fin de siècle ethics: Some trends. Philosophical Review 101: 115-189.
5. Frankena, William., 1973. Ethics (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall).
6. Gettier, Edmund., 1963. Is justified, true belief knowledge Analysis 23: 121-123.
7. Hare, R. M., 1952. The language of morals (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
8. Harman, Gilbert., 1977. The nature of morality (New York: Oxford University Press).
9. Harman, Gilbert., 1986. Moral explanations of natural facts: Can moral claims be tested against moral reality The Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (Supplement): 57-68.
10. Horgan, Terence., and Mark, Timmons., 1992. Troubles for new wave moral semantics: The ‘open question argument’ revived. Philosophical Papers 21: 153-175.
11. Moore, G. E., 1960. Principia ethica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
12. Moore, Michael S., 1992. Moral reality revisited. Michigan Law Review 90: 2424-2533.
13. Putnam, Hilary., 1975. Philosophy and our mental life. In Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 291-303.
14. Putnam, Hilary., 1981. Reason, truth and history (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
15. Railton, Peter., 1986. Moral realism. Philosophical Review 95: 163-207.
16. Railton, Peter., 1998. Moral explanation and moral objectivity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 175-182.
17. Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey., 1988. Moral theory and explanatory impotence. In Essays on moral realism, ed. Geoffrey Sayre-McCord (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 256-281.
18. Sturgeon, Nicholas., 1986. Harman on moral explanations of natural facts. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (Supplement): 69-78.
19. Sturgeon, Nicholas., 1988. Moral explanations. In Essays on moral realism, ed. Geoffrey Sayre-McCord (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 229-255.
20. Sturgeon, Nicholas., 1991. Contents and causes: A reply to Blackburn. Philosophical Studies 61: 19-37.
21. De Inwagen, Peter. 1992. Reply to Christopher Hill. Analysis 52: 56-61.