Flash Glucose Monitoring Improves Outcomes in a Type 1 Diabetes Clinic

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 442-443

  Dover, Anna R ^a   Stimson, Roland H ^a,b   Zammitt, Nicola N ^a   Gibb, Fraser W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

continuous glucose monitoring; flash glucose monitoring; Freestyle Libre; HbA1c; type 1 diabetes

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN;

ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FLASH GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INSULIN INFUSION; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; LETTER; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; DEVICES; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; MIDDLE AGED;

ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSULIN INFUSION SYSTEMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 85014576657     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296816661560     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Heinemann L, Freckmann G,. CGM versus FGM; or, continuous glucose monitoring is not flash glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015; 9 (5): 947-950.
2. Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Garg SK, et al. Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369 (3): 224-232.
3. Bailey T, Bode BW, Christiansen MP, Klaff LJ, Alva S,. The performance and usability of a factory-calibrated flash glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015; 17 (11): 787-794.