Application of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis (Sepsis-3) Classification: a retrospective population-based cohort study

The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 661-670

  Donnelly, John P ^a,b   Safford, Monika M ^d,e   Shapiro, Nathan I ^f,g   Baddley, John W ^c   Wang, Henry E ^a  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^d University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^e WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^f HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^g BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSESSMENT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFECTION; INFECTION AND SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME CRITERIA; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY RATE; MORTALITY RISK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; SHORT COURSE THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; CONSENSUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITALIZATION; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MORTALITY; ORGAN DYSFUNCTION SCORE; SHOCK, SEPTIC; SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME; UNITED STATES;

CONSENSUS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN DYSFUNCTION SCORES; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHOCK, SEPTIC; SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85014242260     PISSN: 14733099     EISSN: 14744457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30117-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Angus, DC, Linde-Zwirble, WT, Lidicker, J, Clermont, G, Carcillo, J, Pinsky, MR, Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med 29 (2001), 1303–1310.
2. Wang, HE, Shapiro, NI, Angus, DC, Yealy, DM, National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments. Crit Care Med 35 (2007), 1928–1936.
3. Kaukonen, KM, Bailey, M, Suzuki, S, Pilcher, D, Bellomo, R, Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA 311 (2014), 1308–1316.
4. Martin, GS, Mannino, DM, Eaton, S, Moss, M, The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 348 (2003), 1546–1554.
5. Iwashyna, TJ, Angus, DC, Declining case fatality rates for severe sepsis: good data bring good news with ambiguous implications. JAMA 311 (2014), 1295–1297.
6. Gaieski, DF, Edwards, JM, Kallan, MJ, Carr, BG, Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States. Crit Care Med 41 (2013), 1167–1174.
7. Dellinger, RP, Carlet, JM, Masur, H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 30 (2004), 536–555.
8. Singer, M, Deutschman, CS, Seymour, CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 315 (2016), 801–810.
9. Seymour, CW, Liu, VX, Iwashyna, TJ, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 315 (2016), 762–774.
10. Angus, DC, Seymour, CW, Coopersmith, CM, et al. A framework for the development and interpretation of different sepsis definitions and clinical criteria. Crit Care Med 44 (2016), e113–e121.
11. Seymour, CW, Coopersmith, CM, Deutschman, CS, et al. Application of a framework to assess the usefulness of alternative sepsis criteria. Crit Care Med 44 (2016), e122–e130.
12. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 20 (1992), 864–874.
13. Levy, MM, Fink, MP, Marshall, JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med 29 (2003), 530–538.
14. Howard, VJ, Cushman, M, Pulley, L, et al. The reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study: objectives and design. Neuroepidemiology 25 (2005), 135–143.
15. Vincent, JL, Moreno, R, Takala, J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22 (1996), 707–710.
16. Shankar-Hari, M, Phillips, GS, Levy, ML, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315 (2016), 775–787.
17. Janssen, I, Katzmarzyk, PT, Ross, R, Body mass index, waist circumference, and health risk: evidence in support of current National Institutes of Health guidelines. Arch Intern Med 162 (2002), 2074–2079.
18. James, MT, Hemmelgarn, BR, Wiebe, N, et al. Glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and the incidence and consequences of acute kidney injury: a cohort study. Lancet 376 (2010), 2096–2103.
19. Pencina, MJ, D'Agostino, RB Sr, Steyerberg, EW, Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 30 (2011), 11–21.
20. Gu, W, Pepe, M, Measures to summarize and compare the predictive capacity of markers. Int J Biostat, 5, 2009 article 27.
21. Lemeshow, S, Hosmer, DW Jr, A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 115 (1982), 92–106.
22. Harrell, FE, Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis, 2001, Springer, New York, NY.
23. Uno, H, Tian, L, Cai, T, Kohane, IS, Wei, LJ, A unified inference procedure for a class of measures to assess improvement in risk prediction systems with survival data. Stat Med 32 (2013), 2430–2442.
24. Chambless, LE, Cummiskey, CP, Cui, G, Several methods to assess improvement in risk prediction models: extension to survival analysis. Stat Med 30 (2011), 22–38.
25. Hosmer, DW, Lemeshow, S, May, S, Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time-to-event data, 2nd edn, 2008, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ.
26. Iwashyna, TJ, Odden, A, Rohde, J, et al. Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the Angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis. Med Care 52 (2014), e39–e43.
27. Whittaker, SA, Mikkelsen, ME, Gaieski, DF, Koshy, S, Kean, C, Fuchs, BD, Severe sepsis cohorts derived from claims-based strategies appear to be biased toward a more severely ill patient population. Crit Care Med 41 (2013), 945–953.
28. Jolley, RJ, Sawka, KJ, Yergens, DW, Quan, H, Jette, N, Doig, CJ, Validity of administrative data in recording sepsis: a systematic review. Crit Care, 19, 2015, 139.
29. Rhee, C, Murphy, MV, Li, L, et al. Comparison of trends in sepsis incidence and coding using administrative claims versus objective clinical data. Clin Infect Dis 60 (2015), 88–95.
30. April, MD, Aguirre, J, Tannenbaum, LI, et al. Sepsis clinical criteria in emergency department patients admitted to an intensive care unit: an external validation study of quick sequential organ failure assessment. J Emerg Med, 2016, 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.10.01 published online Nov 4.
31. Besen, BA, Romano, TG, Nassar, AP Jr., et al. Sepsis-3 definitions predict ICU mortality in a low-middle-income country. Ann Intensive Care, 6, 2016, 107.
32. Rhee, C, Murphy, MV, Li, L, et al. Improving documentation and coding for acute organ dysfunction biases estimates of changing sepsis severity and burden: a retrospective study. Crit Care, 19, 2015, 338.