Energetic and exergoeconomic assessment of a multi-generation energy system based on indirect use of geothermal energy

Energy

Volumn 124, Issue , 2017, Pages 625-639

  Akrami, Ehsan ^a   Chitsaz, Ata ^b   Nami, Hossein ^c   Mahmoudi, S M S ^c  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b URMIA UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ   (Iran)

Author keywords

Absorption refrigeration cycle; Exergoeconomic analysis; Geothermal energy; Multi generation; Organic Rankine cycle; PEME

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION COOLING; ABSORPTION REFRIGERATION; COSTS; ELECTROLYTIC CELLS; EXERGY; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; RANKINE CYCLE; TEMPERATURE; WATER ABSORPTION;

ENERGY AND EXERGY EFFICIENCY; EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HEATING AND COOLING LOADS; MULTI GENERATIONS; ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLES; PEME; PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANES; TURBINE INLET TEMPERATURE;

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY;

ABSORPTION; COST ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; WATER TEMPERATURE;

EID: 85014095941     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. [1] Mohammadkhani, F., Ranjbar, F., Yari, M., A comparative study on the ammonia–water based bottoming power cycles: the exergoeconomic viewpoint. Energy 87 (2015), 425–434.
2. [2] Tsatsaronis, G., Lin, L., Pisa, J., Exergy costing in exergoeconomics. J energy Resour Technol 115:1 (1993), 9–16.
3. [3] Dincer, I., Zamfirescu, C., Renewable-energy-based multigeneration systems. Int J Energy Res 36:15 (2012), 1403–1415.
4. [4] Al-Sulaiman, F.A., Dincer, I., Hamdullahpur, F., Energy and exergy analyses of a biomass trigeneration system using an organic Rankine cycle. Energy 45:1 (2012), 975–985.
5. [5] Al-sulaiman, F.A., Hamdullahpur, F., Dincer, I., Performance assessment of a novel system using parabolic trough solar collectors for combined cooling, heating, and power production. Renew Energy 48 (2012), 161–172.
6. [6] Nami, H., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Nemati, A., Exergy, economic and environmental impact assessment and optimization of a novel cogeneration system including a gas turbine, a supercritical CO2and an organic Rankine cycle (GT-HRSG/SCO2). Appl Therm Eng 110 (2017), 1315–1330.
7. [7] Bicer, Y., Dincer, I., Analysis and performance evaluation of a renewable energy based multigeneration system. Energy 94 (2016), 623–632.
8. [8] Ahmadi, P., Rosen, M.A., Dincer, I., Multi-objective exergy-based optimization of a polygeneration energy system using an evolutionary algorithm. Energy 46:1 (2012), 21–31.
9. [9] Nami, H., Mohammadkhani, F., Ranjbar, F., Utilization of waste heat from GTMHR for hydrogen generation via combination of organic Rankine cycles and PEM electrolysis. Energy Convers Manag 127 (2016), 589–598.
10. [10] El-Emam, R.S., Dincer, I., Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses and optimization of geothermal organic Rankine cycle. Appl Therm Eng 59:1 (2013), 435–444.
11. [11] Yilmaz, C., Kanoglu, M., Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis. Energy 69 (2014), 592–602.
12. [12] Yilmaz, C., Kanoglu, M., Abusoglu, A., Thermoeconomic cost evaluation of hydrogen production driven by binary geothermal power plant. Geothermics 57 (2015), 18–25.
13. [13] Calise, F., D'Accadia, M.D., MacAluso, A., Piacentino, A., Vanoli, L., Exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of a novel hybrid solar-geothermal polygeneration system producing energy and water. Energy Convers Manag 115 (2016), 200–220.
14. [14] Calise, F., Ferruzzi, G., Vanoli, L., Transient simulation of polygeneration systems based on PEM fuel cells and solar heating and cooling technologies. Energy 41:1 (2012), 18–30.
15. [15] Kotas, T.J., The exergy method of thermal plant analysis. 2013, Elsevier.
16. [16] Ni, M., Leung, M.K.H., Leung, D.Y.C., Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer plant. Energy Convers Manag 49 (2008), 2748–2756.
17. [17] Nami, H., Akrami, E., Ranjbar, F., Hydrogen production using the waste heat of Benchmark pressurized Molten carbonate fuel cell system via combination of organic Rankine cycle and proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis. Appl Therm Eng 114 (Mar. 2017), 631–638.
18. [18] Gurau, V., Barbir, F., Liu, H., An analytical solution of a half-cell Model for PEM fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 147:7 (2000), 2468–2477.
19. [19] Chan, S.H., Xia, Z.T., Polarization effects in electrolyte/electrode-supported solid oxide fuel cells. 2002, 339–347.
20. [20] Karimzadeh, D., Economic possibility assessment of creating wind power stations at Soltanieh zone of Zanjan province. J Artif Intell Electr Eng 3:11 (2014), 50–56.
21. [21] Lazzaretto, A., Tsatsaronis, G., On the calculation of efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Proceedings of the ASME advanced energy systems division, vol. 39, 1999, 421–430.
22. [22] Khani, L., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Chitsaz, A., Rosen, M.A., Energy and exergoeconomic evaluation of a new power/cooling cogeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell. Energy 94 (2016), 64–77.
23. [23] Yari, M., Mehr, A.S., Zare, V., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Rosen, M.A., Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source. Energy 83 (2015), 712–722.
24. [24] Misra, R.D., Sahoo, P.K., Gupta, A., Thermoeconomic evaluation and optimization of an aqua-ammonia vapour-absorption refrigeration system. Int J Refrig 29:1 (2006), 47–59.
25. [25] Yilmaz, C., Kanoglu, M., Abusoglu, A., Exergetic cost evaluation of hydrogen production powered by combined flash-binary geothermal power plant. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:40 (2015), 14021–14030.
26. [26] Zare, V., A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of different ORC configurations for binary geothermal power plants. Energy Convers Manag 105 (2015), 127–138.
27. [27] Khalilarya, S., Nemati, A., A numerical investigation on the influence of EGR in a supercharged SI engine fueled with gasoline and alternative fuels. Energy Convers Manag 83 (2014), 260–269.
28. [28] Saeidi, S., Mahmoudi, S.M., Nami, H., Yari, M., Energy and exergy analyses of a novel near zero emission plant: combination of MATIANT cycle with gasification unit. Appl Therm Eng 108 (2016 Sep 5), 893–904.
29. [29] Saeidi, S., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Nami, H., Yari, M., Energy and exergy analyses of a novel near zero emission plant: combination of MATIANT cycle with gasification unit. Appl Therm Eng 108 (2016), 893–904.
30. [30] Nami, H., Ranjbar, F., Yari, M., Saeidi, S., Thermodynamic analysis of a modified oxy-fuel cycle, high steam content Graz cycle with a dual-pressure heat recovery steam generator. Int J Exergy 21:3 (2016), 331–346.