Automating individualized formative feedback in large classes based on a directed concept graph

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue FEB, 2017, Pages

  Schaffer, Henry E ^a   Young, Karen R ^a   Ligon, Emily W ^a   Chapman, Diane D ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automatic assessment tools; Concept graph; Concept tree; Formative assessment; Instructor interfaces; Intelligent tutoring systems; Learner content interaction; Student assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014031666     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00260     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, L. W., and Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Benien, K. (2015). Never Assume what a Student Knows: Three Tips to Support Mastery Development, Available online at: http://blog.cengage.com/never-assume-what-a-student-knows-three-tips-to-support-mastery-development/(Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
3. Bloom, B. S., (ed.). (1956). "Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals" in Handbook I: Cognitive Domain (New York, NY: David McKay Company).
4. Blumenstyk, G. (2014). Companies Promise Personalized Education. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Available: http://chronicle.com/article/Companies-Promise/148725/(Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
5. Bradley, J. K. (2013). Peer Grading in Massive Open Online Courses. Available online at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jkbradle/projects/PeerGrading.html (Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
6. Brinton, C. G., Rill, R., Ha, S., Chang, M., and Smith, W. J. (2015). "Individualization for education at scale: MIIC design and preliminary evaluation," in IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, Vol. 8, Available online at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=6955856 (Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
7. Cuseo, J. (2007). The empirical case against large class size: Adverse effects on the teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students. J. Fac. Dev. 21, 5-21.
8. Dell Inc., (2014). Dell Student Retention Model for Harper College, Available online at: http://i.dell.com/sites/doccontent/public/solutions/k12/en/Documents/dell-student-retention-model-for-harper-college-wp-5-20-final.pdf (Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
9. Duhring, J. (2013). Massive MOOC Grading Problem-Stanford HCI Group Tackles Peer Assessment. Available online at: http://moocnewsandreviews.com/massive-mooc-grading-problem-stanford-hci-group-tackles-peer-assessment/(Accessed Nov14, 2016).
10. EdX (2014). Harvard and MIT Release Working Papers on Open Online Courses. Available online at: https://www.edx.org/blog/harvard-mit-release-working-papers-open#.VARrL0u9bwI (Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
11. Fiedor, L. (2007). Increasing Student Success with Large Course Redesign Strategies: An Overview and Recommendations for NC State, Available online at: https://delta.ncsu.edu/assets/lcr_paper.pdf (Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
12. Gibson, A., Kitto, K., and Willis, J. J. (2014). "A cognitive processing framework for learning analytics," in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '14) (Indianapolis, IN), 212-216.
13. Hampson, K. (2014). Understanding Analytics. Acrobatiq Insights. Available online at: http://acrobatiq.com/analytics-in-online-higher-education-three-categories/(Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
14. Kolowich, S. (2014). Completion Rates Aren't the Best Way to Judge MOOCs, Researchers Say, Available online at: http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/completion-rates-arent-the-best-way-to-judge-moocs-researchers-say/49721 (Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
15. Kuder, G. F., and Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability, Psychometrika 2, 151-160.
16. Leeman-Munk, S. P., Wiebe, E. N., and Lester, J. C. (2014). "Assessing elementary students' science competency with text analytics," in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '14) (Indianapolis, IN), 143-147.
17. Luo, H., and Robinson, H. C. (2014). "Is peer grading a valid assessment method for massively open online courses?," in Proceedings of the SLOAN-C 7th Annual International Symposium: Emerging Technologies for Online Learning. (Dallas, TX).
18. Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. Am. J. Distance Edu. 3, 106.
19. NC State University (2014). "Computer Science," in Gehringer's Research Advances Peer Review Systems. Available online at: http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/news/1664 (Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
20. Piety, P. J., Hickey, D. T., and Bishop, M. J. (2014). "Educational data sciences-framing emergent practices for analytics of learning, organizations, and systems," in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '14) (Indianapolis, IN), 193-202.
21. Piech, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., Do, C., Ng, A., and Koller, D. (2013). Tuned Models of Peer Assessment in MOOCs. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
22. Radcliffe, S. (2007). Teaching machines and programmed instruction: an annotated bibliography. NSPI J. 2, 9-12. doi: 10.1002/pfi.4210020706
23. Rees, J. (2013). Peer Grading Won't Work, Inside Higher Ed., Available online at: https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/03/05/essays-flaws-peer-grading-moocs (Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
24. Rogers, T., Colvin, C., and Chiera, B. B. (2014). "Modest analytics: Using the index method to identify students at risk of failure," in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '14) (Indianapolis, IN), 118-122.
25. Scriven, M. (1967). "The methodology of evaluation" in Curriculum Evaluation. American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Evaluation, No. 1, (Chicago, IL: Rand McNally).
26. Shah, N. B., Bradley, J. K., Parekh, A., Wainwright, M., and Ramchandran, K. (2013). A Case for Ordinal Peer-Evaluation in MOOCs. NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education, Available online at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jkbradle/papers/shahetal.pdf (Accessed Nov 14, 2016).
27. Wise, A. F. (2014). "Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics," in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '14) (Indianapolis, IN), 203-211.