Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance

Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 89-104

  Connaway, Lynn Silipigni ^a   Sievert, MaryEllen C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013777820     PISSN: 01639374     EISSN: 15444554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J104v23n02_07     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rao Aluri, D. Alasdair Kemp, and John J. Boll, Subject Analysis in Online Catalogs (Englewood, Colo, : Libraries Unlimited, 1991), p. 165.
2. Lois Mai Chan, Cataloging and Classification: An Introduction, 2nd ed., (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994), p. 327.
3. Chan, Cataloging and Classification, p, 327.
4. Arlene G. Taylor, Introduction to Cataloging and Classification, 8th ed., (Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited, 1992), p. 388.
5. James T. Deffenbaugh “Three Classification Schemes for Use in a Ju-daeo-Christian Theological Library: A Comparative Study, ” ERIC (1975), ED 157 524.
6. Ruth Polan, “A Dewey-Eyed Look at Children’s Book Classification: A Comparison of Four Classification Schemes Used in Children's Literature, ” ERIC (1975), ED 122 782.
7. Christopher E. Merrett, Map Classification: A Comparison of Schemes with Special Reference to the Continefit of Africa (Urbana-Champaign: Illinois University Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1982).
8. Susan Bury, “National Library of Medicine Classification Compared with Bliss Class H, ” Health Libraries Review 1, no, 4 (1984): 179-190.
9. Bert R. Boyce et al., “Measurement of Subject Scatter in the Superintendent of Documents Classification, " Government Publications Review, 17 (1990):333-339.
10. James W. Markham “LCC, DDC, and Algae, ” Library Resources & Technical Services 34, no. 1 (January 1990):54-61.
11. Raj Padmini, “Position and Organisation of Subject Content of Anaesthesiology in Different Library Classification Systems, ” in Tools for Knowledge Organization and the Human Interface, Proceedings of the 1st International 1SK.0 Conference, Darmstadt, 14-17 August 1990, (Part I), p. 133-143.
12. Boyce et al., “Measurement of Subject Scatter, ” p. 333-339.
13. Markham “LCC, DDC, and Algae, ” p. 54-61.
14. Bury, “National Library of Medicine Classification, ” p. 179-190.
15. Deffenbaugh “Three Classification Schemes, ” p. 21-22.
16. F. W. Lancaster, Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice (Champaign, 111, ; University of Illinois, 1991), p. 121.
17. Chan, Cataloging and Classification, p. 269.
18. Aluri, Kemp, and Boll, Subject Analysis, p. 187.
19. Taylor, Introduction to Cataloging and Classification, 8th ed, p. 350-351.
20. Chan, Cataloging and Classification, p. 369-370.