Weather Analysis and Forecasting

Weather Analysis and Forecasting

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Santurette, Patrick ^a   Georgiev, Christo G ^b  

^a MÉTÉO FRANCE   (France)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013761998     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-619262-9.X5000-X     Document Type: Book

References (19)

1. Images in weather forecasting. A practical guide for interpreting satellite and radar imagery 1995, University Press. M.J. Bader, G.S. Forbes, J.R. Grant, R.B.E. Lilley, A.J. Waters (Eds.).
2. Browning K.A. The dry intrusion perspective of extra-tropical cyclone development. Meteorol. Appl. 1997, 4:317-324.
3. Carroll E.B. Poorly forecast trough disruption shown in water vapour images. Meteorol. Appl. 1997, 4:229-234. © UK Crown copyright, published by Met Office.
4. Demirtas M., Thorpe A.J. Sensitivity of short-range weather forecasts to local potential vorticity modifications. Mon. Wea. Rev. 1999, 127:922-939.
5. Eyre J. Meteosat water vapour imagery. Meteorol. Mag. 1981, 110:345-351. © UK Crown copyright, published by Met Office.
6. Fischer H., Eigenwillig N., Müller H. Information content of METEOSAT and Nimbus/THIR water vapor channel data: altitude association of observed phenomena. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1981, 20:1344-1352.
7. Georgiev C.G. Quantitative relationship between Meteosat WV data and positive potential vorticity anomalies: a case study over the Mediterranean. Meteorol. Appl. 1999, 6:97-109.
8. Georgiev C.G., Martín F. Use of potential vorticity fields, Meteosat water vapour imagery and pseudo water vapour images for evaluating numerical model behaviour. Meteorol. Appl. 2001, 8:57-69.
9. Heymsfield G., Blackmer R.H. Satellite-observed characteristics of Midwest severe thunderstorm anvils. Mon. Wea. Rev. 1988, 116:2200-2224.
10. Hoskins B.J., McIntyre M.E., Robertson A.W. On the use and significance of isentropic potential vorticity maps. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1985, 111:877-946.
11. Hoskins B. A potential vorticity view of synoptic development. Meteorol. Appl. 1997, 4:325-334.
12. Mansfield D.A. The use of potential vorticity as an operational forecast tool. Meteorol. Appl. 1996, 3:195-210. © UK Crown copyright, published by Met Office.
13. Martín F., Riosalido R., de Esteban L. The Sigüenza tornado: a case study based on convective ingradients concept and conceptual models. Meteorol. Appl. 1997, 4:191-206.
14. Pankiewicz G.S., Swarbrick S.J., Watkin S.C. Automatic estimation of potential vorticity from Meteosat water vapour imagery to adjust initial fields in NWP. The 1999 Meteorological Satellite Data Users' Conference 1999, 387-394. EUM P 26, EUMETSAT, Lighthouse Multimedia Darmstadt.
15. Pedder M.A. The omega equation: Q-G interpretations of simple circulation features. Meteorol. Appl. 1997, 4:335-344.
16. Santurette P., Joly A. ANASYG/PRESYG, Météo-France's new graphical summary of the synoptic situation. Meteorol. Appl. 2002, 9:129-154.
17. Schmetz J., Turpeinen O.M. Estimation of the upper tropospheric relative humidity field from METEOSAT water vapor image data. J. Appl. Meteor. 1988, 27:889-899.
18. Swarbrick S.J. Applying the relationship between potential vorticity fields and water vapour imagery to adjust initial conditions in NWP. Meteorol. Appl. 2001, 8:221-228.
19. Weldon R.B., Holmes S.J. Water vapor imagery: interpretation and applications to weather analysis and forecasting. NOAA Technical Report 1991, NESDIS 57, 213 pp., NOAA, US Department of Commerce, Cambridge.