Publisher Correction: Feasibility and coexistence of large ecological communities (Nature Communications (2017) 8 (14389) DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14389);Feasibility and coexistence of large ecological communities

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Grilli, Jacopo ^a   Adorisio, Matteo ^b   Suweis, Samir ^c   Barabás, György ^a   Banavar, Jayanth R ^d   Allesina, Stefano ^a,e   Maritan, Amos ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b SISSA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^d Bldg 142   (United States)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; COMPLEXITY; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; ECOLOGICAL ZONATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY;

FEASIBILITY STUDY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISPERSAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOTA; CARNIVORY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; HERBIVORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT DISPERSAL; PREDATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYMBIOSIS;

ANIMAL DISTRIBUTION; ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOTA; CARNIVORY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; HERBIVORY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANTS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 85013759099     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16228     Document Type: Erratum

References (48)

1. Gillooly, J. F., Brown, J. H., West, G. B., Savage, V. M. & Charnov, E. L. Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science 293, 2248-2251 (2001).
2. Walther, G.-R. et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389-395 (2002).
3. Tylianakis, J. M., Didham, R. K., Bascompte, J. & Wardle, D. A. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1351-1363 (2008).
4. Harmon, J. P., Moran, N. A. & Ives, A. R. Species response to environmental change: impacts of food web interactions and evolution. Science 323, 1347-1350 (2009).
5. Tylianakis, J. M., Laliberté, E., Nielsen, A. & Bascompte, J. Conservation of species interaction networks. Biol. Conserv. 143, 2270-2279 (2010).
6. Meszéna, G., Gyllenberg, M., Pásztor, L. & Metz, J. A. J. Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: a unified theory. Theor. Popul. Biol. 69, 68-87 (2006).
7. Barabás, G., Pásztor, L., Meszéna, G. & Ostling, A. Sensitivity analysis of coexistence in ecological communities: theory and application. Ecol. Lett. 17, 1479-1494 (2014).
8. Barabás, G., Pigolotti, S., Gyllenberg, M., Dieckmann, U. & Meszéna, G. Continuous coexistence or discrete species? A new review of an old question. Evol. Ecol. Res. 14, 523-554 (2012).
9. Rohr, R. P., Saavedra, S. & Bascompte, J. On the structural stability of mutualistic systems. Science 345, 1253497-1253497 (2014).
10. May, R. M. & Leonard, W. J. Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29, 243-253 (1975).
11. May, R. M. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238, 413-414 (1972).
12. Allesina, S. & Tang, S. Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature 483, 205-208 (2012).
13. Suweis, S., Grilli, J. & Maritan, A. Disentangling the effect of hybrid interactions and of the constant effort hypothesis on ecological community stability. Oikos 123, 525-532 (2014).
14. Allesina, S. et al. Predicting the stability of large structured food webs. Nat. Commun. 6, 7842 (2015).
15. MacArthur, R. H. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36, 533-536 (1955).
16. Gilpin, M. E. Stability of feasible predator-prey systems. Nature 254, 137-139 (1975).
17. Roberts, A. The stability of a feasible random ecosystem. Nature 251, 607-608 (1974).
18. Goh, B. & Jennings, L. Feasibility and stability in randomly assembled Lotka- Volterra models. Ecol. Model. 3, 63-71 (1977).
19. Saavedra, S., Rohr, R. P., Olesen, J. M. & Bascompte, J. Nested species interactions promote feasibility over stability during the assembly of a pollinator community. Ecol. Evol. 6, 997-1007 (2016).
20. Volterra, V. Leçons sur la Théorie Mathématique de la Lutte Pour la vie. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 42, 304-305 (1936).
21. Goh, B. S. Global stability in many-species systems. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2459985?seq=1#page-scan-tab-contents (1977).
22. Logofet, D. O. Stronger-than-Lyapunov notions of matrix stability, or how flowers help solve problems in mathematical ecology. Linear Algebra Appl. 398, 75-100 (2005).
23. Johnson, C. R. Positive definite matrices. Am. Math. Monthly 77, 259 (1970).
24. Tang, S. & Allesina, S. Reactivity and stability of large ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2, 2-21 (2014).
25. Svirezhev, Y. M. & Logofet, D. O. The Stability of Biological Communities (Nauka, 1978).
26. Allesina, S. & Tang, S. The stability-complexity relationship at age 40: a random matrix perspective. Popul. Ecol. 57, 63-75 (2015).
27. Cohen, J. E., Briand, F. & Newman, C. M. Community Food Webs: Data and Theory (Springer, 1990).
28. Williams, R. J. & Martinez, N. D. Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404, 180-183 (2000).
29. Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J. & Olesen, J. M. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9383-9387 (2003).
30. Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Olesen, J. M. Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312, 431-433 (2006).
31. Bastolla, U. et al. The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature 458, 1018-1020 (2009).
32. Thébault, E. & Fontaine, C. Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science 329, 853-856 (2010).
33. Armstrong, R. & McGehee, R. Coexistence of species competing for shared resources. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9, 317-328 (1976).
34. Abrams, P. A. The theory of limiting similarity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14, 359-376 (1983).
35. Armstrong, R. & McGehee, R. Competitive exclusion. Am. Natural. 15, 151-170 (1980).
36. Yodzis, P. The indeterminacy of ecological interactions as perceived through perturbation experiments. Ecology 69, 508-515 (1988).
37. Dambacher, J. M., Li, H. W. & Rossignol, P. A. Relevance of community structure in assessing indeterminacy of ecological predictions. Ecology 83, 1372-1385 (2002).
38. Aufderheide, H., Rudolf, L., Gross, T. & Lafferty, K. D. How to predict community responses to perturbations in the face of imperfect knowledge and network complexity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 280, 20132355 (2013).
39. James, A., Pitchford, J. W. & Plank, M. J. Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity. Nature 487, 227-230 (2012).
40. Barabás, G. & Allesina, S. Predicting global community properties from uncertain estimates of interaction strengths. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20150218 (2015).
41. Allesina, S. & Pascual, M. Food web models: a plea for groups. Ecol. Lett. 12, 652-662 (2009).
42. Suweis, S., Grilli, J., Banavar, J. R., Allesina, S. & Maritan, A. Effect of localization on the stability of mutualistic ecological networks. Nat. Commun. 6, 10179 (2015).
43. Suweis, S., Simini, F., Banavar, J. R. & Maritan, A. Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks. Nature 500, 449-452 (2013).
44. Lever, J. J., van Nes, E. H., Scheffer, M. & Bascompte, J. The sudden collapse of pollinator communities. Ecol. Lett. 17, 350-359 (2014).
45. Staniczenko, P. P. A., Kopp, J. C. & Allesina, S. The ghost of nested-ness in ecological networks. Nat. Commun. 4, 1391 (2013).
46. Redheffer, R. Volterra multipliers II. SIAM J. Algebr. Discrete Methods 6, 612-623 (1985).
47. Ribando, J. M. Measuring solid angles beyond dimension three. Discrete Comput. Geom. 36, 479-487 (2006).
48. Gourion, D. & Seeger, A. Deterministic and stochastic methods for computing volumetric moduli of convex cones. Comput. Appl. Math. 29, 215-246 (2010).