Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory

Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Menke, William ^a  

^a Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013754166     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/C2011-0-69765-0     Document Type: Book

References (103)

1. de Lastours V., Guillemain R., Mainardi J.-L., Aubert A., Chevalier P., Lefort A., Podglajen I. Early diagnosis of disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14(2):346.
2. Hansen J., Ruedy R., Sato M., Lo K. Global surface temperature change. Rev. Geophys. 2010, 48:RG4004. doi:10.1029/2010RG000345.
3. Menke W., Menke J. Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab 2011, Academic Press, Elsevier Inc., Oxford, UK, 263pp.
4. Menke W., Menke J. Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab 2011, Academic Press, Elsevier Inc, Oxford, UK, 263pp.
5. Franklin J.N. Well-posed stochastic extensions of ill-posed linear problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1970, 31:682-716.
6. Jackson D.D. Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient and inconsistent data. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 1972, 28:97-110.
7. Jackson D.D. The use of a priori data to resolve non-uniqueness in linear inversion. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 1979, 57:137-157.
8. Jordan T.H., Franklin J.N. Optimal solutions to a linear inverse problem in geophysics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1971, 68:291-293.
9. Lanczos C. Linear Differential Operators 1961, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, Princeton, NJ.
10. Menke W., Menke J. Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab 2011, Academic Press, Elsevier Inc, Oxford, UK, 263pp.
11. Backus G.E., Gilbert J.F. Numerical application of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1967, 13:247-276.
12. Backus G.E., Gilbert J.F. The resolving power of gross earth data. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1968, 16:169-205.
13. Backus G.E., Gilbert J.F. Uniqueness in the inversion of gross Earth data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 1970, 266:123-192.
14. Minster J.F., Jordan T.J., Molnar P., Haines E. Numerical modelling of instantaneous plate tectonics. Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1974, 36:541-576.
15. Wiggins R.A. The general linear inverse problem: Implication of surface waves and free oscillations for Earth structure. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 1972, 10:251-285.
16. Kapur J.N. Maximum Entropy Models in Science and Engineering 1989, Wiley, New York, 636pp.
17. Tarantola A., Valette B. Generalized non-linear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 1982, 20:219-232.
18. Tarantola A., Valette B. Inverse problems=quest for information. J. Geophys. 1982, 50:159-170.
19. Woodbury A.D. Minimum relative entropy, Bayes and Kapur. Geophys. J. Int. 2011, 185:181-189.
20. Oldenburg D.W. Funnel functions in linear and nonlinear appraisal. J. Geophys. Res. 1983, 88:7387-7398.
21. Wunsch C., Minster J.F. Methods for box models and ocean circulation tracers: mathematical programming and non-linear inverse theory. J. Geophys. Res. 1982, 87:5647-5662.
22. Lanczos C. Linear Differential Operators 1961, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, Princeton, New Jersey.
23. Lawson C.L., Hanson D.J. Solving Least Squares Problems 1974, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
24. Menke W., Menke J. Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab 2011, Academic Press, Elsevier Inc., Oxford, UK, 263pp.
25. Penrose R.A. A generalized inverse for matrices. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 1955, 51:406-413.
26. Wiggins R.A. The general linear inverse problem: implication of surface waves and free oscillations for Earth structure. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 1972, 10:251-285.
27. Wunsch C., Minster J.F. Methods for box models and ocean circulation tracers: mathematical programming and non-linear inverse theory. J. Geophys. Res. 1982, 87:5647-5662.
28. Claerbout J.F., Muir F. Robust modelling with erratic data. Geophysics 1973, 38:826-844.
29. Cuer M., Bayer R. FORTRAN routines for linear inverse problems. Geophysics 1980, 45:1706-1719.
30. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C.D., Vecchi M.P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220(4598):671-680.
31. Tarantola A., Valette B. Generalized non-linear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 1982, 20:219-232.
32. Kaiser H.F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1958, 23:187-200.
33. Menke W., Menke J. Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab 2011, Academic Press, Elsevier Inc, Oxford, UK, 263pp.
34. Backus G.E., Gilbert J.F. The resolving power of gross earth data, Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1968, 16:169-205.
35. Dahlen F.A., Hung S.-H., Nolet G. Fréchet kernels for finite frequency traveltimes-I. Theory, Geophys. J. Int. 2000, 141:157-174.
36. Hall M.C.G., Cacuci D.G. Physical interpretation of the adjoint functions for sensitivity analysis of atmospheric models. J. Atmos. Sci. 1983, 40:2537-2546.
37. Lanczos C. Linear Differential Operators 1961, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, Princeton, NJ.
38. Moore A.M., Arango H.G., Di Lorenzo E., Cornuelle B.D., Miller A.J., Neilson D.J. A comprehensive ocean prediction and analysis system based on the tangent linear and adjoint of a regional ocean model. Ocean Modelling 2004, 7:227-258.
39. Tromp J., Tape C., Liu Q. Seismic tomography, adjoint methods, time reversal and banana-doughnut kernels, Geophys. J. Int. 2005, 160:195-216.
40. Crosson R.S. Crustal structure modeling of earthquake data: 1. Simultaneous least squares estimation of hypocenter and velocity parameters. J. Geophys. Res. 1976, 81:3036-3046.
41. Fisher R.A. Dispersion on a sphere. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A 1953, 217:295-305.
42. Geiger L. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicenters from the arrival time only (translated from Geiger's 1910 German article). Bull. St. Louis University 1912, 8(1):56-71.
43. Kaula W.M. Theory of Satellite Geodesy 1966, Ginn (Blaisdel), Boston, Massachusetts.
44. Menke W., Abbott D. Geophysical Theory 1990, Columbia University Press, New York, 457pp.
45. Smith S.G. Measurement of airgun waveforms. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 1975, 42:273-280.
46. Aki K., Richards P.G. Quantitative Seismology 2002, University Science Books, Sausalito, California, 700pp. second ed.
47. Aki K., Christoffersson A., Husebye E. Three-dimensional seismic structure under the Montana LASA. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 1976, 66:501-524.
48. Baba K., Chave A. Correction of seafloor magnetotelluric data for topographic effects during inversion. J. Geophys. Res. 2005, 110(B12105):16. doi:10.1029/2004JB003463.
49. Bloxam J. Simultaneous inversion for geomagnetic main field and secular variation, 1. A large scale inversion problem. J. Geophys. Res. 1987, 92:11597-11608.
50. Bloxam J. The steady part of the secular variation of the earth's magnetic field. J. Geophys. Res. 1992, 97:19565-19579.
51. Boschi J., Ekström G. New images of the Earth's upper mantle from measurements of surface wave phase velocity anomalies. J. Geophys. Res. 2002, 107:2059.
52. Cerveny V. Seismic Ray Theory 2001, Cambridge University Press, New York, 607pp.
53. Chase E.P., Stuart G.S. The N plate problem of plate tectonics. Geophys. J. R. Astronom. Soc. 1972, 29:117-122.
54. Chave A., Jones A., Mackie R., Rodi W. The Magnetotelluric Method, Theory and Practice 2012, Cambridge University Press, New York, 590pp.
55. Crosson R.S. Crustal structure modeling of earthquake data: 1. Simultaneous least squares estimation of hypocenter and velocity parameters. J. Geophys. Res. 1976, 81:3036-3046.
56. Dahlen F.A., Hung S.-H., Nolet G. Fréchet kernels for finite frequency traveltimes-i. Theory. Geophys. J. Int. 2000, 141:157-174.
57. Dalton C.A., Ekström G. Global models of surface wave attenuation. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111:B05317.
58. DeMets C., Gordon R.G., Argus D.F. Geologically current plate motions. Geophys. J. Int. 2010, 181:1-80.
59. Dziewonski A.M., Anderson D.L. Preliminary reference earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 1981, 25:297-358.
60. Dziewonski A.M., Woodhouse J.H. An experiment in systematic study of global seismicity: centroid-moment tensor solutions for 201 moderate and large earthquakes of 1981. J. Geophys. Res. 1983, 88:3247-3271.
61. Dziewonski A.M., Chou T.-A., Woodhouse J.H. Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J. Geophys. Res. 1981, 86:2825-2852.
62. Geiger L. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicenters from the arrival time only (translated from Geiger's 1910 German article). Bull. St. Louis Univ. 1912, 8:56-71.
63. Grossling B.F. Seamount Magnetism. The Sea 1970, vol. 4:129-156. Wiley, New York. A.E. Maxwell (Ed.).
64. Jacobson R.S., Shor G.G., Dorman L.M. Linear inversion of body wave data-part 2: attenuation vs. depth using spectral ratios. Geophysics 1981, 46:152-162.
65. Kim Y., Liu Q., Tromp J. Adjoint centroid-moment tensor inversions. Geophys. J. Int. 2011, 186:264-278.
66. Klein F.W. User's guide to HYPOINVERSE, a program for VAX and PC350 computers to solve for earthquake locations 1985, U.S. Geologic Survey Open File Report 85-515, 24pp.
67. Marquering H., Dahlen F.A., Nolet G. Three-dimensional sensitivity kernels for finite frequency traveltimes: the banana-doughnut paradox. Geophys. J. Int. 1999, 137:805-815.
68. Martinson D.G., Menke W., Stoffa P. An inverse approach to signal correlation. J. Geophys. Res. 1982, 87:4807-4818.
69. Masters G., Gilbert F. Attenuation in the earth at low frequencies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1983, 388:479-522.
70. Menke W. Case studies of seismic tomography and earthquake location in a regional context. Geophysical Monograph Series 2005, 157:7-36. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. A. Levander, G. Nolet (Eds.).
71. Menke W., Abbott D. Geophysical Theory (Textbook) 1989, Columbia University Press, New York, 458pp.
72. Menke W., Schaff D. Absolute earthquake location with differential data. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 2004, 94:2254-2264.
73. Menke W., Holmes R.C., Xie J. On the nonuniqueness of the coupled origin time-velocity tomography problem. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 2006, 96:1131-1139.
74. Minster J.B., Jordan T.H., Molnar P., Haines E. Numerical modeling of instantaneous plate tectonics. Geophys. J. R. Astronom. Soc. 1974, 36:541-576.
75. Oldenburg D.W. Funnel functions in linear and nonlinear appraisal. J. Geophys. Res. 1983, 88:7387-7398.
76. Parker R.L. The inverse problem of the electrical conductivity of the mantle. Geophys. J. R. Astronom. Soc. 1970, 22:121-138.
77. Parker R.L. The Fréchet derivative for the one dimensional electromagnetic induction problem. Geophys. J. R. Astronom. Soc. 1977, 39:543-547.
78. Parker R.L. A statistical theory of seamount magnetism. J. Geophys. Res. 1988, 93:3105-3115.
79. Parker R.L., Shure L., Hildebrand J. An application of inverse theory to seamount magnetism. Rev. Geophys. 1987, 25:17-40.
80. Pavlis G.L., Booker J.R. The mixed discrete-continuous inverse problem: application to the simultaneous determination of earthquake hypocenters and velocity structure. J. Geophys. Res. 1980, 85:4801-4809.
81. Romanowicz B. Attenuation tomography of the earth's mantle: a review of current status. Pure Appl. Geophys. 1998, 153:257-272.
82. Sandwell D.T. Biharmonic spline interpolation of GEOS-3 and SEASAT altimeter data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1987, 14:139-142.
83. Shure L., Chave A.D. Comments on "An inverse approach to signal correlation". J. Geophys. Res. 1984, 89:2497-2500.
84. Shure L., Parker R.L., Backus G.E. Harmonic splines for geomagnetic modeling. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 1982, 28:215-229.
85. Shure L., Parker R.L., Langel R.A. A preliminary harmonic spline model for MAGSAT data. J. Geophys. Res. 1985, 90:11505-11512.
86. Sieminski A., Liu Q., Trampert J., Tromp J. Finite-frequency sensitivity of surface waves to anisotropy based upon adjoint methods. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 168:1153-1174.
87. Slunga R., Rognvaldsson S.T., Bodvarsson B. Absolute and relative locations of similar events with application to microearthquakes in southern Iceland. Geophys. J. Int. 1995, 123:409-419.
88. Spence W., Alexander S. A method of determining the relative location of seismic events. Earthquake Notes 1968, 39:13.
89. Takeuchi H., Saito M. Seismic surface waves. Methods of Computational Physics 1972, 11:217-295. Academic Press, New York. B.A. Bolt (Ed.).
90. Tromp J., Tape C., Liu Q. Seismic tomography, adjoint methods, time reversal and banana-doughnut kernels. Geophys. J. Int. 2005, 160:195-216.
91. Vasco D.W. Extremal inversion of travel time residuals. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1986, 76:1323-1345.
92. Vidale J. Finite difference calculation of travel times in 3-D. Geophysics 1990, 55:521-526.
93. Waldhauser F., Ellsworth W. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm; method and application to the northern Hayward Fault, California. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 2000, 90:1353-1368.
94. Wang Z., Dahlen F.A. Validity of surface-wave ray theory on a laterally heterogeneous earth. Geophys. J. Int. 1995, 123:757-773.
95. Wessel P., Becker J. Gridding of spherical data using a Green's function for splines in tension. Geophys. J. Int. 2008, 174:21-28.
96. Zelt C.A. FAST: 3-D First Arrival Seismic Tomography programs http://terra.rice.edu/department/faculty/zelt/fast.html.
97. Zelt C.A., Barton P.J. 3D seismic refraction tomography: a comparison of two methods applied to data from the Faeroe Basin. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103:7187-7210.
98. Zhang H., Thurber C.H. Double-difference tomography; the method and its application to the Hayward Fault, California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2003, 93:1875-1889.
99. Hansen J., Ruedy R., Sato Mki., Lo K. Global surface temperature change. Rev. Geophys. 2010, 48:RG4004.
100. Menke W., Menke J. Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab 2011, Academic Press, Elsevier Inc, Oxford, UK, 263pp.
101. Part-Enander E., Sjoberg A., Melin B., Isaksson P. The Matlab Handbook 1996, Addison-Wesley, New York, 436pp.
102. Pratap R. Getting Started with MATLAB: A Quick Introduction for Scientists and Engineers 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 256pp.
103. Menke W., Menke J. Environmental Data Analysis with MatLab 2011, Academic Press, Elsevier Inc, Oxford UK, 263pp.