Assistive Technology in the Workplace

Assistive Technology in the Workplace

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  de Jonge, Desleigh ^a   Scherer, Marcia ^b,c   Rodger, Sylvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c International Center for Hearing and Speech Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013697780     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-04130-0.X5001-8     Document Type: Book

References (408)

1. Anson DK Alternative computer access: a guide to selection 1997, FA Davis, Philadelphia.
2. Rights of the disabled: towards a new UN convention, 2004 2003, Asia Network Pacific Human Rights, South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre, New Delhi, India.
3. Asia Pacific Human Rights Network: Treating the disabled: rights, not charity, 2002. Retrieved February 17, 2004. http://www.hrdc.net/sahrdc/hrfquarterly/Oct_Dec_2002/Treating.htm.
4. Balandin S, Iacono T The impact of socially valid vocabulary of interactions between employees with severe communication impairments and their non-disabled peers. National Disability Research Agenda No. 1 1997, Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra.
5. Barnes C, Mercer G, Shakespeare T Exploring disability 1999, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Barson R: Reasonable adjustment: rights, technology and the workplace. Paper presented at the Australian Conference on Technology for People with Disabilities, October 9-12, 1995, Adelaide.
7. Bazinet G Assistive technology. Community rehabilitation services for people with disabilities 1995, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston. O.C. Karan, S. Greenspan (Eds.).
8. Beaver KA, Mann WC Provider skills for delivering computer access services: an assistive technology team approach. Technol Disabil 1994, 3(2):109-116.
9. Brooks NA Models for understanding rehabilitation and assistive technology. Designing and using assistive technology: the human perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
10. Bruyére SM, Erickson WA, Van Looy S Comparative study of workplace policy and practices contributing to disability non-discrimination. Rehabil Psychol 2004, 49(1):28-38.
11. Butterworth J, Kiernan WE Access to employment for all individuals: legislative, systems and service delivery issues. People with disabilities who challenge the system 1996, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.H. Lehr, F. Brown (Eds.).
12. Chadsey-Rusch J, DeStephano L, O'Reilly L, et al. Use of non-disabled subjects in AAC research: confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative Alternative Communication 1995, 11:2-5.
13. Cook A, Hussey S Assistive technologies: principles and practice 2002, Mosby, St. Louis. ed 2.
14. Covington GA Cultural and environmental barriers to assistive technology. Designing and using assistive technology: the human perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
15. Cowan DM, Turner-Smith AR The funding agencies' perspective on the provision of electronic Assistive Technology: equipping for life?. Br J Occup Ther 1999, 62:75-79.
16. Cowan DM, Turner-Smith AR The user's perspective on the provision of electronic Assistive Technology: equipped for life?. Br J Occup Ther 1999, 62:2-6.
17. DeRuyter F Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment?. Assistive Technol 1995, 7:3-16.
18. Dowler DL, Hirsh AE, Kittle RD, et al. Outcomes of reasonable accommodations in the workplace. Technol Disabil 1996, 5:345-354.
19. Fresher-Samways K, Roush SE, Choi K, et al. Perceived quality of life of adults with developmental and other significant disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25(19):1097-1105.
20. Galvin JC Assistive technology: federal policy and practice since 1982. Technol Disabil 1997, 6:3-15.
21. Golden M The American Disabilities Act of 1990. Vocational Rehabil 1991, 3:13-20.
22. Gradel K Customer service: what is its place in assistive technology and employment services?. Vocational Rehabil 1991, 3:41-54.
23. Hammel JM, Smith RO The development of technology competencies and training guidelines for occupational therapists. Am J Occup Ther 1993, 47(11):970-979.
24. Hammel JM, Symons J Evaluating for reasonable accommodation: a team approach. J Prevention Assessment Rehabil 1993, 3(4):12-21.
25. Inge KJ, Wehman P, Strobel W, et al. Supported employment and assistive technology for persons with spinal cord injury: three illustrations of successful work supports. J Vocational Rehabil 1998, 10:141-152.
26. Kregel J, Tomiyasu Y Employers' attitudes toward workers with disabilities: effect of the Americans with Disabilities Act. J Vocational Rehabil 1994, 4(3):165-173.
27. Lash M, Licenziato V Career transitions for people with severe physical disabilities: integrating technology and psychosocial skills and accommodations. Work 1995, 5:85-98.
28. Lunt N, Thornton P Employment policies for disabled people 1993, Research Management Branch, Employment Dept., Moorfoot, England.
29. Researching disability employment policies 1997, The Disability Press, Leeds, England. N. Lunt, P. Thornton (Eds.).
30. Study on the financing of assistive technology devices and services for individuals with disabilities 1993, National Council of Disability, National Council on Disability, Washington, DC.
31. Nochajski SM, Oddo CR Technology in the workplace. Assistive technology for people with disabilities 1995, AOTA, Bethesda, MD. ed 2. W.C. Mann, J.P. Lane (Eds.).
32. O'Day BL, Corcoran PJ Assistive technology: problems and policy alternatives. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75:1165-1169.
33. Pell SB, Gillies RM, Carss M Relationship between use of technology and employment rates for people with physical disabilities in Australia: publication for education and training programmes. Disabil Rehabil 1997, 19(8):332-338.
34. Pell SB, Gillies RM, Carss M Use of technology by people with physical disabilities in Australia. Disabil Rehabil 1999, 21(2):56-60.
35. Post KM The promise of assistive technology. Am J Occup Ther 1993, 47(11):965-967.
36. Robinson JE Access to employment for people with disabilities: findings of a consumer-led project. Disabil Rehabil 2000, 22(5):246-253.
37. Rohl JS: Technology directions and their impact on the way we work, 1998. Retrieved September 2000, from. http://www.doplar.wa.gov.au/w&f/wfcr/rohl.html.
38. Rumrill PD, Garnette M Career adjustment via reasonable accommodations: the effects of an employee-empowerment intervention for people with disabilities. J Prevention Assessment Rehabil 1997, 9:57-64.
39. Rumrill PD, Steffen J, Kaleta D, et al. Job placement interventions for people with multiple sclerosis. Work 1996, 6:167-175.
40. Schall CM The American Disabilities Act: are we keeping our promise? An analysis of the effect of the ADA on the employment of persons with disabilities. J Vocational Rehabil 1998, 10:191-203.
41. Scherer MJ Connecting to learn: educational and assistive technology for people with disabilities 2004, American Psychological Association (APA) Books, Washington, DC.
42. Scherer MJ Living in a state of stuck: how assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities 2005, Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA. ed 4.
43. Scherer MJ The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with disabilities. Designing and using assistive technology: the human perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
44. Scherer MJ, McKee B What employees want to know about assistive technology in the workplace. SHHH J 1993, 14(1):23-27.
45. Scherer MJ, Vitaliti LT Functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation. Functional assess ment and outcome measures for the health rehabilitation professional. Gaithersburg 1997, Aspen, MD. S.S. Dittmar, G.E. Gresham (Eds.).
46. Schneider M Achieving greater independence through assistive technology, job accommodation and supported employment. J Vocational Rehabil 1999, 12:159-164.
47. Sidoti C: The DDA and employment of people with a disability, 1998. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from. http://www.hreoc.gov.au//disability_rights/speeches/1998/employment_98.html.
48. Smith G: Computers and the employment of people with a severe physical disability. Paper presented at the Australian Conference on Technology for People with Disabilities, Adelaide, South Australia, October 9-12, 1995.
49. Smith G The impact of speech recognition on people with disabilities (National Disability Research Agenda No. 1) 1997, Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra, Australia.
50. Sowers JA Adaptive environments in the workplace. Assistive technology: a resource for school, work and community 1995, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. K.F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, J.M. Barcus (Eds.).
51. Sowers JA Employment for persons with physical disabilities and related technology. Vocational Rehabil 1991, 3:55-64.
52. Spencer JC Tools or baggage? Alternative meanings of assistive technology. Designing and using assistive technology: the human perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
53. Steinfeld E, Angelo J Adaptive work placement: a "horizontal" model. Technol Disabil 1992, 1(4):1-10.
54. Stephanidis C, Emiliani PL "Connecting" to the information society: a European perspective. Technol Disabil 1999, 10:21-44.
55. Storey K, Ezell H, Lengyel L Communication strategies for increasing the integ ration of persons in supported employment: a review. Am J Speech-Language Pathology 1995, 4:45-54.
56. Van der Loos HFM, Machiel HF, Hammel J Engineering reasonable accommodation: the delivery and use of assistive technology in a vocational training program. Technol Disabil 1996, 5:371-382.
57. Wehman P Work, employment and disability: meeting the challenge. J Vocational Rehabil 1998, 11(1):1-3.
58. Westmorland MG, Zeytinoglu I, Pringle P, et al. The elements of a positive workplace environment: implications for persons with disabilities. J Prevention Assessment Rehabil 1998, 10:109-117.
59. International classification of function, disability and health: ICF 2001, World Health Organization, WHO, Geneva.
60. The international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps (ICIDH) 1980, World Health Organization, WHO, Geneva.
61. Yvislaker M, Urbanczyk B, Feeney TJ Social skills following traumatic brain injury. Sem Speech Language 1992, 13:308-319.
62. Bailey RW Human Performance Engineering 1989, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
63. Bain BK, Leger D Assistive Technology: An Interdisciplinary Approach 1997, Churchill Livingstone, New York.
64. Breaking the Mould? An Introduction to Doing Disability Research 1997, The Disability Press, Leeds, England. C. Barnes, G. Mercer (Eds.).
65. Batavia AI, Hammer GS Toward the Development of Consumer-Based Criteria for the Evaluation of Assistive Devices. J Rehabil Res Development 1990, 27(4):425-436.
66. Baum CM Achieving effectiveness with a client-centered approach: a person-environment interaction. Designing and Using Assistive Technology 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
67. Bazinet G Assistive technology. Community Rehabi litation Services for People with Disabilities 1995, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston. O.C. Karan, S. Greenspan (Eds.).
68. Brooks NA Models for understanding rehabilitation and assistive technology. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
69. Brooks NA Users' responses to assistive devices for physical disability. Social Sci Med 1991, 32(12):1417-1424.
70. Butterworth J, Kiernan WE Access to employment for all individuals: legislative, systems and service delivery issues. People with Disabilities Who Challenge the System 1996, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.H. Lehr, F. Brown (Eds.).
71. Chadwick A Rights on a wrong wheel: the dangers of a medical approach to civil rights. Austral Disabil Rev 1995, 2:40-59.
72. Cook A, Hussey S Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice 2002, Mosby, St. Louis. ed 2.
73. Covington GA Cultural and environmental barriers to assistive technology. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
74. Cushman LA, Scherer MJ Measuring the relationship of assistive technology use, functional status over time, and consumer-therapist perceptions of ATs. Assistive Technol 1996, 8:103-109.
75. Day H, Jutai JW Measuring the psychosocial impact on assistive devices: the PAIDS. Can J Rehabil 1996, 9:159-168.
76. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil 2002, 14:101-105.
77. Dewsbury G, Clarke K, Randall D, et al. The anti-social model of disability. Disabil Soc 2004, 19(2):145-158.
78. Enders A: Technology for life in a new disability paradigm. Keynote Presentation. Paper presented at the Australian Conference on Technology for People with Disabilities, Sydney, September 28-30, 1999.
79. Fearing VG, Clark J Individuals in context: a practical guide to client-centered practice 2000, Slack, Inc., Thorofare, NJ.
80. Garber S, Gregorio T Upper extremity assistive devices: assessment of use by spinal cord injured patients with quadriplegia. Am J Occup Ther 1990, 44(2):126-131.
81. Hocking C Function or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technol Disabil 1999, 11:3-11.
82. Krefting LH The use of conceptual models in clinical practice. Can J Occup Ther 1985, 52(4):173-178.
83. Law M Client-centered occupational therapy 1998, Slack, Inc., Thorofare, NJ.
84. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure 1994, Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Toronto. ed 2.
85. Lenker JA Professional education programs in rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology. Technol Disabil 1998, 9:37-48.
86. Lenker JA, Paquet VL A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technol 2003, 15:1-15.
87. Maguire M Methods to support human-centered design. Int J Human-Computer Studies 2001, 55:587-634.
88. Mann WC, Hurren D, Tomita M Comparison of assistive device use and needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. Am J Occup Ther 1993, 47(11):980-987.
89. Mann WC, Lane JP Assistive Technology for Persons with Disabilities 1995, American Occupational Therapy Association, Bethesda, MD. ed 2.
90. Mann WC, Tomita M Perspectives on assistive devices among elderly persons with disabilities. Technol Disabil 1998, 9:119-148.
91. Martinko MJ, Henry JW, Zmud RW Attributional explanation of individual resis tance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace. Behavior Information Technol 1996, 15:313-330.
92. Nochajski SM, Oddo CR Technology in the workplace. Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities 1995, AOTA, Bethesda, MD. ed 2. W.C. Mann, J.P. Lane (Eds.).
93. Nochajski SM, Oddo C, Beaver K Technology and transition: tools for success. Technol Disabil 1999, 11:93-101.
94. Oliver R The politics of disablement 1990, Macmillan, London.
95. Pedretti LW Occupational performance: a model for practice in physical dysfunction. Occupational Therapy: Practice Skills for Physical Dysfunction 1996, Mosby, St. Louis. ed 4. L.W. Pedretti (Ed.).
96. Phillips B Technology abandonment from the consumer point of view. NARIC Quarterly 1993, 3(2-3):4-91.
97. Phillips B, Zhao H Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technol 1993, 5:36-45.
98. Post KM The promise of assistive technology. Am J Occup Ther 1993, 47(11):965-967.
99. Poulson D, Richardson S USERfit: a framework for user centered design in Assistive Technology. Technol Disabil 1998, 9:163-171.
100. Reed K Theory and frame of reference. Willard and Spackman's Occupational Therapy 1998, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia. M.E. Neistadt, E.B. Crepeau (Eds.).
101. Reed K, Sanderson SN Concepts of Occupational Therapy 1999, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
102. Rogers JC, Holm MB Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review. Am J Occup Ther 1992, 46(2):120-127.
103. Scherer MJ Living in a State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities 2000, Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA. ed 3.
104. Scherer MJ Living in a State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities 2005, Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA. ed 4.
105. Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbeirvliet A, Cushman LA, Scherer JV Predictors of assistive technlogy use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil 2005, 27(21):1321-1331.
106. Scherer MJ The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with disabi lities. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
107. Scherer MJ, Vitaliti LT Functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation. Functional Assessment and Outcome Measures for the Health Rehabilitation Professionals 1997, Aspen, Gaithersburg, MD. S.S. Dittmar, G.E. Gresham (Eds.).
108. Seidel AC Theories derived from rehabilitation perspectives. Willard and Spackman's Occupational Therapy 1998, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia. M.E. Neistadt, E.B. Crepeau (Eds.).
109. Smith RO Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. Assistive Technol 1996, 8:71-81.
110. Spencer JC Tools or baggage? Alternative meanings of assistive technology. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
111. Sprigle S, Abdelhamied A The relationship between ability measures and assistive technology selection, design and use. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
112. Steinfeld E, Angelo J Adaptive work placement: a "horizontal" model. Technol Disabil 1992, 1(4):1-10.
113. Symms J, Ross D: Hierarchy of Assistive Technology. Paper presented at the RESNA Conference, Long Beach, Calif, 1991.
114. Functional Independence Measure, version 5.1 1997, Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDS), Buffalo General Hospital, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, .
115. Verbrugge LM, Rennert C, Madans JH The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. Am J Public Health 1997, 87:384-392.
116. Vincent C, Morin G L'Utilisation ou non des aides techniques: comparaison d'un modeleamericain aux besoins de la realite quebecoise. Can J Occup Ther 1999, 66(2):92-101.
117. Weiner B An attributional theory of achievement-motivation and emotion. Psychological Rev 1985, 92(4):548-573.
118. International Classification of Function, Disability and Health: ICF 2001, World Health Organization, WHO, Geneva.
119. The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) 1980, World Health Organization, WHO, Geneva.
120. Computer and Web Resources for People with Disabilities 2005, Alliance for Technology Access, Hunter House, Berkeley, Calif.
121. Bain BK, Leger D Assistive Technology: An Interdisciplinary Approach 1997, Churchill Livingstone, New York.
122. Baum CM Achieving effectiveness with a client-centered approach: a person-environment interaction. Designing and Using Assistive Technology 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
123. Cook A, Hussey S Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice 2002, Mosby, St. Louis. ed 2.
124. Creswell JW Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
125. Denzin N, Lincoln Y Strategies of qualitative inquiry 1998, Sage, London.
126. Gage M Re-engineering of health care: opportunity or threat for occupational thera pists?. Can J Occup Ther 1995, 62(4):197-207.
127. Galvin JC Assistive technology: federal policy and practice since 1982. Technol Disabil 1997, 6:3-15.
128. Gradel K Customer service: what is its place in assistive technology and employment services?. Vocational Rehabil 1991, April:41-54.
129. Huberman AM, Miles MB Data management and analysis methods. Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials 1998, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
130. Kelker K, Holt R Family guide to assistive technology 2000, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass.
131. Krefting L Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther 1991, 45:214-222.
132. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure 1994, Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Toronto. ed 2.
133. Lincoln YS, Guba EG Naturalistic Inquiry 1985, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif.
134. Malec JF Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabil 1999, 9(3-4):253-275.
135. Nochajski SM, Oddo CR Technology in the workplace. Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities 1995, AOTA, Bethesda, Md. ed 2. W.C. Mann, J.P. Lane (Eds.).
136. Patton MQ Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 1990, Sage Publications, Newberry Park, Calif. ed 2.
137. Phillips B, Zhao H Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technol 1993, 5:36-45.
138. Pope C, Mays N Research the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative research methods in health and health services research. Br Med J 1995, 311:42-45.
139. Rice P, Ezzy D Qualitative Research Methods: A Health Focus 1999, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia.
140. Scherer MJ Living in a State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities 1993, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass. ed 2.
141. Scherer MJ Living in a State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities 2000, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass. ed 3.
142. Scherer MJ The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with dis abilities. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
143. Scherer MJ, Galvin JC An outcomes perspective to quality pathways to the most appropriate technology. Evaluating, Selecting, and Using Appropriate Assistive Technology 1996, Aspen, Gaithersburg, MD. J.C. Galvin, M. Scherer (Eds.).
144. Sprigle S, Abdelhamied A The relationship between ability measures and assistive technology selection, design and use. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
145. Wielandt PM, McKenna K, Tooth LR, et al. Post discharge use of bathing equipment prescribed by occupational therapists: what lessons to be learned?. Phys Occup Ther Geriatrics 2001, 19(3):49-65.
146. Computer and Web Resources for People with Disabilities 2000, Alliance for Technology Access, Hunter House, Berkeley, Calif.
147. Andrich R, Besio S Being informed, demanding and responsible consumers of assistive technology: an educational issue. Disabil Rehabil 2002, 24(1-3):152-159.
148. Angelo J, Buning ME, Schmeler M, et al. Identifying best practice in occupational therapy assistive technology evaluation: an analysis of three focus groups. Am J Occup Ther 1997, 51(10):916-920.
149. Anson DK Alternative Computer Access: A Guide to Selection 1997, FA Davis, Philadelphia.
150. Bain BK, Leger D Assistive Technology: An Interdisciplinary Approach 1997, Churchill Livingstone, New York.
151. Bazinet G Assistive technology. Community Rehabilitation Services for People with Disabilities 1995, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston. O.C. Karan, S. Greenspan (Eds.).
152. Behrman MM Assistive technology training. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School, Work and Community 1995, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. K.F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, J.M. Barcus (Eds.).
153. Brooks NA Models for understanding rehabilitation and assistive technology. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
154. Brooks NA Users' responses to assistive devices for physical disability. Social Sci Med 1991, 32(12):1417-1424.
155. Cook A, Hussey S Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice 2002, Mosby, St. Louis. ed 2.
156. Covington GA Cultural and environmental barriers to assistive technology. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
157. Cowan D, Turner-Smith A The user's perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: equipped for life?. Br J Occup Ther 1999, 62(1):2-6.
158. Dailey P, Scherer MJ Mobilizing my resources. Computer Resources for People with Disabilities: A Guide to Assistive Technologies, Tools and Resources for People of All Ages 2004, Hunter House Inc., Alameda, Calif., in Alliance for Technology Access. ed 4.
159. Dowler DL, Hirsh AE, Kittle RD, et al. Outcomes of reasonable accommodations in the workplace. Technol Disabil 1996, 5:345-354.
160. Ehrlich NJ, Carlson D, Bailey N Sources of information about how to obtain assistive technology: findings from a national survey of persons with disabilities. Assistive Technol 2003, 15:28-38.
161. Galvin JC Assistive technology: federal policy and practice since 1982. Technol Disabil 1997, 6:3-15.
162. Gradel K Customer service: what is its place in assistive technology and employment services?. Vocational Rehabil 1991, April:41-54.
163. Hammel JM, Symons J Evaluating for reasonable accommodation: a team approach. J Prevention Assessment Rehabil 1993, 3(4):12-21.
164. Hawley MS, O'Neill P, Webb LH, et al. A provision framework and data logging tool to aid the prescription of electronic assistive technology. Technol Disabil 2002, 14:43-52.
165. Inge KJ, Wehman P, Strobel W, et al. Supported employment and assistive tech no logy for persons with spinal cord injury: three illustrations of successful work sup ports. J Vocational Rehabil 1998, 10:141-152.
166. Kay H Computer and Internet Use among People with Disabilities 2000, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington, DC.
167. Kelker K, Holt R Family Guide to Assistive Technology 2000, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass.
168. Langton AJ, Ramseur H Enhancing employment outcomes through job accommo dation and assistive technology resources and services. J Vocational Rehabil 2001, 16:27-37.
169. Lash M, Licenziato V Career transitions for people with severe physical disabilities: integrating technology and psychosocial skills and accommodations. Work 1995, 5:85-98.
170. Law M Client-Centered Occupational Therapy 1998, SLACK Inc., Thorofare, NJ.
171. Mann WC, Tomita M, Packard S, et al. The need for information on assistive devices by older persons. Assistive Technol 1994, 6:134-139.
172. McKinley W, Tewksbury MA, Sitter P, et al. Assistive technology and computer adap ta tions for individuals with spinal cord injury. Neuro Rehabil 2004, 19:141-146.
173. Nochajski SM, Oddo CR Technology in the workplace. Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities 1995, AOTA, Bethesda, MD. ed 2. W.C. Mann, J.P. Lane (Eds.).
174. Phillips B, Zhao H Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technol 1993, 5:36-45.
175. Roelands M, Van Oost P, Buysse A, et al. Awareness among community-dwelling elderly of assistive devices for mobility and self-care and attitudes towards their use. Social Sci Med 2002, 54:1141-1451.
176. Rogers JC, Holm MB Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review. Am J Occup Ther 1992, 46(2):120-127.
177. Rumrill PD, Garnette M Career adjustment via reasonable accommodations: the effects of an employee-empowerment intervention for people with disabilities. J Prevention Assessment Rehabil 1997, 9:57-64.
178. Scherer MJ Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabil Psychol 2005, 50(2):132-141.
179. Scherer MJ Living in a State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities 1993, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass. ed 2.
180. Scherer MJ Living in a State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities 2000, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass. ed 3.
181. Scherer MJ The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with disabilities. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
182. Scherer MJ The Matching Person & Technology (MPT) Model Manual and Assessment 2005, The Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc., Webster, NY, [CD-ROM]. ed 5.
183. Scherer MJ, Craddock G Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technol Disabil 2002, 14:125-131.
184. Scherer MJ, Galvin JC An outcomes perspective to quality pathways to the most appropriate technology. Evaluating, Selecting, and Using Appropriate Assistive Technology 1996, Aspen, Gaithersburg, Mass. J.C. Galvin, M. Scherer (Eds.).
185. Scherer MJ, Vitaliti LT Functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation. Functional Assessment and Outcome Measures for the Health Rehabilitation Professional 1997, Aspen, Gaithersburg, MD. S.S. Dittmar, G.E. Gresham (Eds.).
186. Sidoti C: The DDA and Employment of People with a Disability, 1998. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from. http://www.hreoc.gov.au//disability_rights/speeches/1998/employment_98.html.
187. Smith RO Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. Assistive Technol 1996, 8:71-81.
188. Sowers JA Employment for persons with physical disabilities and related techno logy. Vocational Rehabil 1991, 3:55-64.
189. Sprigle S, Abdelhamied A The relationship between ability measures and assistive technology selection, design and use. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
190. Struck M Technology solutions for ADA compliance. Occup Ther Health Care 1999, 11(4):23-28.
191. Assistive Technology 1997, Slack, Thorofare, NJ. E. Trefler (Ed.).
192. Turner E, Barrett C, Cutshall A, et al. The user's perspective of assistive technology. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School, Work and Community 1995, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. K.F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, J.M. Barcus (Eds.).
193. Turner E, Wehman P, Wallace JF, et al. Overcoming obstacles to community re-entry for persons with spinal cord injury: assistive technology, ADA and self advocacy. J Prevention Assessment Rehabil 1997, 9:171-186.
194. Wallace JF, Gilson BB Disabled and non-disabled: allied together to change the system. J Prevention Assessment Rehabil 1997, 9:73-80.
195. Computer and Web Resources for People with Disabilities 2000, Alliance for Technology Access, Hunter House, Berkeley, Calif.
196. Bain BK, Block L, Strehlow A Survey report on the assessment of individuals with spinal cord injuries for assistive technology. Technol Disabil 1996, 5:289-294.
197. Booth M: Access and Compatibility Issues: A Survey of Consumers. Paper presented at the Australian conference on technology for people with disabilities, Adelaide, South Australia, October 9-12, 1995.
198. Butterworth J, Kiernan WE Access to employment for all individuals: legislative, systems and service delivery issues. People with Disabilities Who Challenge the System 1996, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore,. D.H. Lehr, F. Brown (Eds.).
199. Cook A: Assistive Technology Trends in North America. Paper presented at the Third Australian Conference on Technology for People with Disabilities, Adelaide, November 25-28, 1997.
200. Cook A, Hussey S Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice 2002, Mosby, St. Louis. ed 2.
201. Cowan D, Turner-Smith A The user's perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: equipped for life?. Br J Occup Ther 1999, 62(1):2-6.
202. Curtis J Employment and disability in the United Kingdom: an outline of recent legislative and policy changes. Work 2003, 20:45-51.
203. Dowler DL, Hirsh AE, Kittle RD, et al. Outcomes of reasonable accommodations in the workplace. Technol Disabil 1996, 5:345-354.
204. Enders A: Technology for Life in a New Disability Paradigm. Keynote presentation at the Fourth Australian Conference on Technology for People with Disabilities, Sydney, September 28-30, 1999.
205. Galvin JC Assistive technology: federal policy and practice since 1982. Technol Disabil 1997, 6:3-15.
206. Goggin G, Newall C Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media 2003, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md.
207. Gradel K Customer service: what is its place in assistive technology and employment services?. Vocational Rehabil 1991, April:41-54.
208. Hagner D, Cooney B Building employer capacity to support employees with severe disabilities in the workplace. Work 2003, 21:77-82.
209. Hammel JM, Symons J Evaluating for reasonable accommodation: a team approach. J Prevention Assessment Rehabil 1993, 3(4):12-21.
210. Kay H Computer and Internet Use among People with Disabilities 2000, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington, DC.
211. Langton AJ, Ramseur H Enhancing employment outcomes through job accommo dation and assistive technology resources and services. J Vocational Rehabil 2001, 16:27-37.
212. Lash M, Licenziato V Career transitions for people with severe physical disabilities: integrating technology and psychosocial skills and accommodations. Work 1995, 5:85-98.
213. Lunt N, Thornton P Country policy reports: Australia. Employment Policies for Disabled People: A Review of Legislation and Services in Fifteen Countries 1993, University of York, York, Social Policy Research Unit.
214. Lupton D, Seymour W Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50:1851-1862.
215. Mc Kinley W, Tewksbury MA, Sitter P, et al. Assistive technology and computer adaptations for individuals with spinal cord injury. Neuro Rehabil 2004, 19:141-146.
216. O'Day BL, Corcoran PJ Assistive technology: problems and policy alternatives. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75:1165-1169.
217. Phillips B, Zhao H Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technol 1993, 5:36-45.
218. Rohl JS: Technology Directions and Their Impact on the Way We Work, 1998. Retrieved September, 2000, from. http://www.doplar.wa.gov.au/w&f/wfcr/rohl.html.
219. Scherer MJ Living in a State of Stuck: How Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities 2005, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass. ed 4.
220. Sowers JA Employment for persons with physical disabilities and related techno logy. Vocational Rehabil 1991, 3:55-64.
221. Steinfeld E, Angelo J Adaptive work placement: a "horizontal" model. Technol Disabil 1992, 1(4):1-10.
222. Turner E, Barrett C, Cutshall A, et al. The user's perspective of assistive technology. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School, Work and Community 1995, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. K.F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, J.M. Barcus (Eds.).
223. Wallace JF Creative financing of assistive technology. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School, Work and Community 1995, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. K.F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, J.M. Barcus (Eds.).
224. Wallace JF, Hayes M, Bailey MN Assistive technology loan financing: a status of program impact and consumer satisfaction. Technol Disabil 2000, 13:17-22.
225. Computer and Web Resources for People with Disabilities 2005, Alliance for Technology Access, Hunter House, Berkeley, Calif.
226. Beaver KA, Mann WC Provider skills for delivering computer access services: an assistive technology team approach. Technol Disabil 1994, 3(2):109-116.
227. Booth M: Access and compatibility issues: a survey of consumers. Paper presented at the Australian conference on technology for people with disabilities, Adelaide, South Australia, October 9-12, 1995.
228. Cook A, Hussey S Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice 2002, Mosby, St. Louis,. ed 2.
229. Inge KJ, Wehman P, Strobel W, et al. Supported employment and assistive techno logy for persons with spinal cord injury: three illustrations of successful work supports. J Vocational Rehabil 1998, 10:141-152.
230. Kelker K, Holt R Family Guide to Assistive Technology 2000, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass.
231. Nochajski SM, Oddo CR Technology in the workplace. Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities 1995, AOTA, Bethesda, MD. ed 2. W.C. Mann, J.P. Lane (Eds.).
232. Pell SB, Gillies RM, Carss M Relationship between use of technology and employ ment rates for people with physical disabilities in Australia: publication for education and training programmes. Disabil Rehabil 1997, 19(8):332-338.
233. Schall CM The American Disabilities Act: are we keeping our promise? An analysis of the effect of the ADA on the employment of persons with disabilities. J Vocational Rehabil 1998, 10:191-203.
234. Scherer MJ Living in a state of stuck: how technology impacts the lives of people with disabili ties 2005, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass. ed 4.
235. Scherer MJ The Matching Person & Technology (MPT) model manual and assessment [CD-ROM] 2005, The Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc., Webster, NY. ed 5.
236. Scherer MJ, Vitaliti LT Functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation. Functional Assessment and Outcome Measures for the Health Rehabilitation Professional 1997, Aspen, Gaithersburg, MD. S.S. Dittmar, G.E. Gresham (Eds.).
237. Sprigle S, Abdelhamied A The relationship between ability measures and assistive technology selection, design and use. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
238. Wallace JF, Gilson BB Disabled and non-disabled: allied together to change the system. J Prevention Assessment Rehabil 1997, 9:73-80.
239. International Classification of Function, Disability and Health: ICF 2001, World Health Organization, WHO, Geneva.
240. Computer and Web Resources for People with Disabilities 2005, Alliance for Technology Access, Hunter House, Berkeley, Calif.
241. Andrich R, Besio S Critical Factors Involved in End-Users' Education in Relation to Assistive Technology 1999, European Commission, Deliverable 6 of the EUSTAT study, Milano, Italy.
242. Anson D, George S, Galup R, et al. Efficiency of the Chubon versus the QWERTY keyboard. Assistive Technol 2001, 13:40-45.
243. Anson D, Lawler G, Kissinger A, et al. Efficacy of three head-pointing devices for a mouse emulation task. Assistive Technol 2002, 14:140-150.
244. Bain BK, Leger D Assistive Technology: An Interdisciplinary Approach 1997, Churchill Livingstone, New York.
245. Bazinet G Assistive technology. Community Rehabi litation Services for People with Disabilities 1995, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston. O.C. Karan, S. Greenspan (Eds.).
246. Beaver KA, Mann WC Provider skills for delivering computer access services: an assistive technology team approach. Technol Disabil 1994, 3(2):109-116.
247. Behrman MM Assistive technology training. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School, Work and Community 1995, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. K.F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, J.M. Barcus (Eds.).
248. Burwell CM Ergonomics. Assistive Technology: An Inter dis ciplinary Approach 1997, Churchill Livingstone, New York. B.K. Bain, D. Leger (Eds.).
249. Cook A, Hussey S Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice 2002, Mosby, St. Louis,. ed 2.
250. Cowan D, Turner-Smith A The user's perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: Equipped for life?. Br J Occup Ther 1999, 62(1):2-6.
251. Decker CA Technical education transfer: perceptions of employee computer techno logy self-efficacy. Computers Human Behav 1999, 15:161-172.
252. Dowler DL, Hirsh AE, Kittle RD, et al. Outcomes of reasonable accommodations in the workplace. Technol Disabil 1996, 5:345-354.
253. Galvin JC Assistive technology: federal policy and practice since 1982. Technol Disabil 1997, 6:3-15.
254. Galvin JC, Donnell CM Educating the consumer and caretaker on assistive technology. Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation 2002, American Psychological Association, Washington DC. M.J. Scherer (Ed.).
255. Goosens G, Crain S Augmentative Communication Assessment Resource 1986, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
256. Gradel K Customer service: what is its place in assistive technology and employment services?. Vocational Rehabil 1991, April:41-54.
257. Hermenau DC Seating. Ergonomics for Therapists 1999, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston. K. Jacobs (Ed.).
258. Hunt HA, Berkowitz M The background and setting. New Technologies and the Employment of Disabled Persons 1992, International Labour Office, Geneva. H.A. Hunt, M. Berkowitz (Eds.).
259. Jones ML Human factors and environmental access. Clinician's Guide to Assistive Technology 2001, Mosby, St. Louis. D.A. Olson, F. DeRuyter (Eds.).
260. Kelker K, Holt R Family Guide to Assistive Technology 2000, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass.
261. King TW Assistive Technology: Essential Human Factors 1999, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, Mass.
262. Lash M, Licenziato V Career transitions for people with severe physical disabilities: integrating technology and psychosocial skills and accommodations. Work 1995, 5:85-98.
263. Lazzaro JJ Adaptive Technologies for Learning and Work Environments 2001, American Library Association, Chicago. ed 2.
264. Cumulative Trauma Disorders 1997, Churchill Livingston Inc., New York. D. Leger, M. Halpern (Eds.).
265. Lupton D, Seymour W Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50:1851-1862.
266. Martinko MJ, Henry JW, Zmud RW Attributional explanation of individual resis tance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace. Behavior Information Technol 1996, 15:313-330.
267. McNeal DR, Somerville NJ, Wilson DJ Work problems and accommodations reported by persons who are postpolio or have a spinal cord injury. Assistive Technol 1999, 11:137-157.
268. Nochajski SM, Oddo CR Technology in the workplace. Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities 1995, AOTA, Bethesda, MD. ed 2. W.C. Mann, J.P. Lane (Eds.).
269. Patterson DR, Jensen M, Engel-Knowles J Pain and its influence on assistive technology use. Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation 2002, American Psychological Association, Washington DC. M.J. Scherer (Ed.).
270. Pell SB, Gillies RM, Carss M Relationship between use of technology and employ ment rates for people with physical disabilities in Australia: publication for education and training programmes. Disabil Rehabil 1997, 19(8):332-338.
271. Phillips B, Zhao H Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technol 1993, 5:36-45.
272. Scherer MJ Living in a State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities 2005, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass. ed 4.
273. Scherer MJ The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with disabi li ties. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
274. Scherer MJ, Galvin JC An outcomes perspective to quality pathways to the most appropriate technology. Evaluating, Selecting, and Using Appropriate Assistive Technology 1999, Aspen, Gaithersburg, Md. J.C. Galvin, M. Scherer (Eds.).
275. Scherer MJ, Vitaliti LT Functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation. Functional Assessment and Outcome Measures for the Health Rehabilitation Professional 1997, Aspen, Gaithersburg, Md. S.S. Dittmar, G.E. Gresham (Eds.).
276. Sowers JA Adaptive environments in the workplace. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School, Work and Community 1995, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. K.F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, J.M. Barcus (Eds.).
277. Sprigle S, Abdelhamied A The relationship between ability measures and assistive technology selection, design and use. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
278. Straker L, Jones KJ, Miller J A comparison of postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers. Appl Ergon 1997, 28(4):263-268.
279. Tate DG, Riley B, Forchheimer M Enhancing the appropriate use of assistive tech no logy among consumers and caretakers. Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation 2002, American Psychological Association, Washington DC. M. Scherer (Ed.).
280. Treviranus J, Petty L Computer access. Clinician's Guide to Assistive Technology 2001, Mosby, St. Louis. D.A. Olson, F. DeRuyter (Eds.).
281. Turner E, Barrett C, Cutshall A, et al. The user's perspective of assistive technology. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School, Work and Community 1995, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. K.F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, J.M. Barcus (Eds.).
282. Weiss T, Chan C Computers and assistive technology. Ergonomics for Therapists 1999, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston. K. Jacobs (Ed.).
283. Wessels RD, Dijcks B, Soede M, et al. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices: a literature overview. Technol Disabil 2003, 15:231-238.
284. Wielandt PM, McKenna K, Tooth LR, et al. Post discharge use of bathing equipment prescribed by occupational therapists: what lessons to be learned?. Phys Occup Ther Geriatrics 2001, 19(3):49-65.
285. Amick B, Habeck RV, Hunt HA, et al. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehabil 2000, 10(1):21-38.
286. Bazinet G Assistive technology. Community Rehabi litation Services for People with Disabilities 1995, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston. O.C. Karan, S. Greenspan (Eds.).
287. Behrman MM Assistive technology training. Assistive Technology: A Resource for School, Work and Community 1995, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. K.F. Flippo, K.J. Inge, J.M. Barcus (Eds.).
288. Butterworth J, Kiernan WE Access to employment for all individuals: legislative, systems and service delivery issues. People with Disabilities Who Challenge the System 1996, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore,. D.H. Lehr, F. Brown (Eds.).
289. Dowler DL, Hirsh AE, Kittle RD, et al. Outcomes of reasonable accommodations in the workplace. Technol Disabil 1996, 5:345-354.
290. Eakin JM Leaving it up to the workers: sociological perspectives on the management of health and safety in small workplaces. Int J Health Services 1992, 22:689-704.
291. Hirsh A, Duckworth K, Hendricks D, et al. Accommodating workers with traumatic brain injury: issues related to TBI and ADA. J Vocational Rehabil 1996, 7:217-226.
292. Lunt N, Thorton P Employment Policies for Disabled People 1993, Research Management Branch, Employment Dept., Moorfoot, England.
293. Rumrill PD Employment and multiple sclerosis: policy, programming, and research recommendations. J Preven Assess Rehabil 1996, 6:205-209.
294. Rumrill PD, Garnette MR Career adjustment via reasonable accommodations: the effects of an employee-empowerment intervention for people with disabilities. J Prevent Assess Rehabil 1997, 9:57-64.
295. Schall CM The American Disabilities Act: are we keeping our promise? An analysis of the effect of the ADA on the employment of persons with disabilities. J Vocational Rehabil 1998, 10:191-203.
296. Scherer MJ, Vitaliti LT Functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation. Functional Assessment and Outcome Measures for the Health Rehabilitation Professional 1997, Aspen, Gaithersburg, Md. S.S. Dittmar, G.E. Gresham (Eds.).
297. Steinfeld E, Angelo J Adaptive work placement: a "horizontal" model. Technol Disabil 1992, 1(4):1-10.
298. Trach PD, Koch LC, Harris J Employers' and service providers' perspectives regarding natural supports in the workplace. Rehabil Counseling Bull 1998, 41(4):293-312.
299. Turner E, Wehman P, Wallace JF, et al. Overcoming obstacles to community re-entry for persons with spinal cord injury: assistive technology, ADA and self advocacy. J Prevent Assess Rehabil 1997, 9:171-186.
300. Westmorland MG, Williams RM, Strong S, et al. Perspective on work re-entry for persons with disabilities: implications for clinicians. Work 2002, 18:29-40.
301. Westmorland MG, Zeytinoglu I, Pringle P, et al. The elements of a positive workplace environment: implications for persons with disabilities. J Prevent Assess Rehabil 1998, 10:109-117.
302. Williams RM, Westmorland MG Perspective on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work 2002, 19:87-93.
303. Andrich R The SCAI instrument: measuring costs of individual assistive techno logy programs. Technol Disabil 2002, 14:95-99.
304. Andrich R, Besio S Being informed, demanding and responsible consumers of assistive technology: an educational issue. Disabil Rehabil 2002, 24(1-3):152-159.
305. Andrich R, Ferrario M, Moi M A model of cost-outcome analysis for assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil 1998, 20:1-24.
306. Batavia AI, Hammer GS Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. J Rehabil Res Development 1990, 27(4):425-436.
307. Benedict RE, Lee JP, Marrujo SK, et al. Assistive devices as an early childhood intervention: evaluating outcomes. Technol Disabil 1999, 11:79-90.
308. Bottos M, Bocati C, Sciuto L, et al. Powered wheelchairs and independence in young children with tetraplegia. Developmental Med Child Neurol 2001, 43:769-777.
309. Brooks NA Models for understanding rehabilitation and assistive technology. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
310. Brown M, Dijkers M, Gordon WA, et al. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004, 19(6):459-481.
311. Buning ME, Angelo JA, Schmeler MR Occupational performance and the transition to powered mobility: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther 2001, 55(3):339-344.
312. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jonge BA, et al. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004, 82:210-216.
313. Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther 2004, 71(4):210-222.
314. Clemmer J Pathways to performance: a guide to transforming yourself, your team, and your organization 1995, Macmillan Canada, Toronto.
315. Cook A, Hussey S Assistive technologies: principles and practice 2002, Mosby, St. Louis. ed 2.
316. Cowan D, Turner-Smith A The user's perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: equipped for life?. Br J Occup Ther 1999, 62(1):2-6.
317. Cushman LA, Scherer MJ Measuring the relationship of assistive technology use, functional status over time, and consumer-therapist perceptions of ATs. Assistive Technol 1996, 8:103-109.
318. Day H, Jutai JW Measuring the psychosocial impact on assistive devices: the PAIDS. Can J Rehabil 1996, 9:159-168.
319. Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen IC, et al. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a client-centered outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil 2004, 18(6):660-667.
320. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assistive Technol 1996, 8:3-13.
321. Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil 2002, 14:101-105.
322. DeRuyter F Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment?. Assistive Technol 1995, 7:3-16.
323. DeRuyter F Outcomes and performance monitoring. Clinician's Guide to Assistive Technology 2001, Mosby, St. Louis. D.A. Olson, F. DeRuyter (Eds.).
324. DeRuyter F The importance of outcome measures for assistive technology service delivery systems. Technol Disabil 1997, 6:89-104.
325. Desrosiers J, Malouin F, Bourbonnais D, et al. Arm and leg impairments and dis abilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap. Clin Rehabil 2003, 17(6):666-673.
326. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A Social participation of older adults in Quebec. Aging Clin Experimental Res 2004, 16(5):406-412.
327. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, et al. Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002, 24(15):774-785.
328. Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Noreau L, et al. Comparison of two functional indepen dence scales with a participation measure in post-stroke rehabilitation. Arch Gerontol Geriatrics 2003, 37(2):157-172.
329. Donnelly C, Carswell A Individualized outcome measures: a review of the literature. Can J Occup Ther 2002, 69(2):84-94.
330. Donnelly C, Eng JJ, Hall J, et al. Client-centered assessment and the identification of meaningful treatment goals for individuals with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2004, 42(5):302-307.
331. Douglas H, Swanson C, Gee T, et al. Outcome measurement in Australian rehabi litation environments. J Rehabil Med 2005, 37(5):325-329.
332. Dowler DL, Hirsh AE, Kittle RD, et al. Outcomes of reasonable accommodations in the workplace. Technol Disabil 1996, 5:345-354.
333. Enders A: Technology for Life in a New Disability Paradigm. Keynote Presentation. Paper presented at the Australian Conference on Technology for People with Disabilities, Sydney, September 28-30, 1999.
334. Fraser BA, Bryan D, Morano CK Development of a physical characteristics assessment (PCA): a checklist for determining appropriate computer access for individuals with cerebral palsy. Assistive Technol 1995, 7:26-35.
335. Fuhrer MJ Assistive technology outcomes research: challenges met and yet unmet. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001, 80(7):528-535.
336. Fuhrer MJ, Demers L, Scherer MJ, et al. Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 84(4):294-302.
337. Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, et al. A framework for the conceptual modeling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25(22):1243-1251.
338. Galvin JC, Donnell CM Educating the consumer and caretaker on assistive techno logy. Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Success ful, Rehabilitation 2002, American Psychological Association, Washington DC. M.J. Scherer (Ed.).
339. Garber S, Gregorio T Upper extremity assistive devices: assessment of use by spinal cord injured patients with quadriplegia. Am J Occup Ther 1990, 44(2):126-131.
340. Gelderblom GJ, De Witte L The assessment of assistive technology outcomes, effects and cost. Technol and Disabil 2002, 14:91-94.
341. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorenson F, et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J Rehabil Med 2001, 33(6):273-278.
342. Harris F, Sprigle S Cost analyses in assistive technology research. Assistive Technol 2003, 15(1):16-27.
343. Heinemann AW Measuring rehabilitation outcomes. Technol Disabil 2000, 12:129-143.
344. Hocking C Function or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technol Disabil 1999, 11:3-11.
345. Jutai JW Quality of life impact of assistive technology. Rehabil Engineering 1999, 14:2-7.
346. Jutai JW, Day H Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technol Disabil 2002, 14:107-111.
347. Jutai J, Day H, Woolrich W, et al. The predictability of retention and discontinuation of contact lenses. Optometry 2003, 74(5):299-308.
348. Jutai JW, Rigby P, Ryan S, et al. Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living. Assistive Technol 2000, 12(2):123-131.
349. Keith RA Patient satisfaction and rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998, 79:1122-1128.
350. Kittel A, Di Marco A, Stewart H Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2002, 24(1-3):106-114.
351. Koester HH, LoPresti E, Ashlock G, et al: Compass: software for computer skills assess ment. March 17-22, 2003. Retrieved November12, 2005, from. http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2003/proceedings/165.htm.
352. Law M Client-Centered Occupational Therapy 1998, SLACK Inc., Thorofare, NJ.
353. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure 1994, Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Toronto. ed 2.
354. Lenker JA, Paquet VL A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technol 2003, 15:1-15.
355. Lenker JA, Paquet VL A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technol 2004, 16:1-10.
356. Lenker JA, Scherer MJ, Fuhrer MJ, et al. Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. Assistive Technol 2005, 17(1):7-22.
357. Lepage C, Noreau L, Bernard PM, et al. Profile of handicap situations in children with cerebral palsy. Scandinavian J Rehabil Med 1998, 30(4):263-272.
358. Lund ML, Nordlund A, Nygard L, et al. Perceptions of participation and predictors of perceived problems with participation in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2005, 37(1):3-8.
359. Malec JF Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1999, 9(3-4):253-275.
360. Mann WC, Hurren D, Tomita M Comparison of assistive device use and needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. Am J Occup Ther 1993, 47(11):980-987.
361. Mann WC, Tomita M Perspectives on assistive devices among elderly persons with disabilities. Technol Disabil 1998, 9:119-148.
362. Morris C, Kurinczuk JJ, Fitzpatrick R Child- or family-assessed measures of activity performance and participation for children with cerebral palsy: a structured review. Child Care Health Development 2005, 31(4):397-407.
363. Murphy GC, Young AE Employment participation following spinal cord injury: relation to selected participant demographic, injury and psychological charac te ris tics. Disabil Rehabil 2005, 27(21):1297-1306.
364. Noreau L, Desrosiers J, Robichaud L, et al. Measuring social participation: reliabi lity of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2004, 26(6):346-352.
365. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Vincent C The LIFE-H: Assessment of the quality of social participation. Technol Disabil 2002, 14:113-118.
366. Norton K, Fougeyrollas P Profile of social consequences of long-standing spinal injury: the occurrence of handicap situations. Disabil Rehabil 2000, 22(4):170-180.
367. Pape TLB, Kim J, Weiner B The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil 2002, 24(1-3):5-20.
368. Patterson DR, Jensen M, Engel-Knowles J Pain and its influence on assistive technology use. Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation 2002, American Psychological Association, Washington DC. M.J. Scherer (Ed.).
369. Petty IS, Treviranus J: Outcome Measures for High Technology Vision Aids: An Application of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 2003. Retrieved December 22, 2005, from. http://www.utoronto.ca/atrc/reference/atoutcomes/visionquest.html.
370. Phillips B Technology abandonment from the consumer point of view. NARIC Quarterly 1993, 3(2-3):4-91.
371. Phillips B, Zhao H Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technol 1993, 5:36-45.
372. Pilling DS Early employment careers of people with disabilities in the National Child Development Study. Work 2002, 18:75-87.
373. Post KM The promise of assistive technology. Am J Occup Ther 1993, 47(11):965-967.
374. Poulson D, Richardson S USERfit: a framework for user centered design in Assistive Technology. Technol Disabil 1998, 9:163-171.
375. Reimer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR Factors associated with assistive technology discon tinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000, 66(3):44-50.
376. Ripat J, Booth A Characteristics of assistive technology service delivery models: stakeholder perspectives and preferences. Disabil Rehabil 2005, 27(24):1461-1470.
377. Rochette A, Desrosiers J Coping with the consequences of a stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 2002, 25(1):17-24.
378. Rodger S, de Jonge D, Fitzgibbon H: Identifying Factors for Successful Integration of Persons with Disabilities Using Technology in the Workplace. Canberra, Australia, Report to Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, 1999.
379. Rogers EM Diffusion of Innovations 1995, Simon & Schuster, New York.
380. Rushton PW, Miller WC Goal attainment scaling in the rehabilitation of patients with lower-extremity amputations: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83(6):771-775.
381. Rust KL, Smith RO Assistive technology in the measurement of rehabilitation and health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 84(10):780-793.
382. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF body functions. Disabil Rehabil 2005, 27(4):191-207.
383. Saunders GH, Jutai JW Hearing specific and generic measures of the psychosocial impact of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2004, 15(3):238-248.
384. Scherer MJ Assessing technology use, avoidance and abandonment: What we know so far. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities 1991, 815-826. California State University, Northridge.
385. Scherer MJ Living in a State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities 2005, Brookline Books, Cambridge, Mass,. ed 4.
386. Scherer MJ The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with disabi li ties. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
387. Scherer MJ The Matching Person & Technology (MPT) Model Manual and Assessment 2005, The Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc., Webster, NY, [CD-ROM]. ed 5.
388. Scherer MJ, Glueckauf R Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabil Psychol 2005, 50(2):132-141.
389. Scherer MJ, Sax CL, Vanbiervliet A, et al. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil 2005, 27(21):1321-1331.
390. Schlosser RW Goal Attainment Scaling as a clinical measurement technique in communication disorders: a critical review. J Commun Disord 2004, 37(3):217-239.
391. Schwanke TD, Smith RO Assistive technology outcomes in work settings. Work 2005, 24:195-204.
392. Siggeirsdottir K, Alfredsdottir U, Einarsdottir G, et al. A new approach in voca tional rehabilitation in Iceland: preliminary report. Work 2004, 22(1):3-8.
393. Smith RO: IMPACT 2 Model, 2005. Retrieved December 12, 2005, from. http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/archive/impact2model.html.
394. Smith RO Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. Assist Technol 1996, 8:71-81.
395. Smith RO OTFACT: multi-level performance-oriented software assistive techno logy outcomes protocol. Technol Disabil 2002, 14:133-139.
396. Sprigle S, Abdelhamied A The relationship between ability measures and assistive technology selection, design and use. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
397. Stineman MG The spheres of self-fulfillment: a multidimensional approach to the assessment of assistive technology outcomes. Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective 1998, Paul H Brookes, Baltimore. D.B. Gray, L.A. Quatrano, M.L. Lieberman (Eds.).
398. Strong G, Jutai JW, Bevers P, et al. The psychosocial impact of closed-circuit television (CCTV) low vision aids. Visual Impairment Res 2004, 5(3).
399. Tam C, Reid D, Naumann S, O'Keefe B Perceived benefits of word prediction inter vention on written productivity in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Occup Ther Int 2002, 9:237-255.
400. Functional Independence Measure, Version 5.1 1997, Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDS), Buffalo General Hospital, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
401. Vanbiervliet A, Parette HP Development and evaluation of the families, cultures and Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ACC) multimedia program. Disabil Rehabil 2002, 24(1-3):131-143.
402. Weiss-Lambrou R Satisfaction and comfort. Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation 2002, American Psychological Association, Washington DC. M.J. Scherer (Ed.).
403. Wessels RD, De Witte LP, Jedeloo S, et al. Effectiveness of provision of outdoor mobility services and devices in the Netherlands. Clin Rehabil 2004, 18:371-378.
404. Wessels R, Persson J, Lorentsen O, et al. IPPA: Individually Prioritised Problem Assessment. Technol Disabil 2002, 14:141-145.
405. Wessels RD, Willems CG, de Witte LP How to select a method to evaluate usability of assistive devices. J Rehabil Sci 1996, 9(2):53-57.
406. Wielandt PM, McKenna K, Tooth LR, et al. Post discharge use of bathing equip ment prescribed by occupational therapists: what lessons to be learned?. Phys Occup Ther Geriatrics 2001, 19(3):49-65.
407. World Health Organization: ICF Checklist, 2005. Retrieved January 20 2005, from. http://www3.who.int/icf/checklist/icf-checklist.pdf.
408. International Classification of Function, Disability and Health: ICF 2001, World Health Organization, WHO, Geneva.