Comparing Increments in Utility of Health: An Individual-based Approach

Value in Health

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 224-229

  Taylor, Matthew ^a   Chilton, Susan ^b   Ronaldson, Sarah ^c   Metcalf, Hugh ^b   Nielsen, Jytte Seested ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

QALY; quality of life; stated preference; utility

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; EMPIRICISM; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INTERVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED KINGDOM;

HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85013662744     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. [1] Drummond, M., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G.W., et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
2. [2] Nord, E., Enge, A.U., Gundersen, V., Is the value of treatment proportional to the size of the health gain?. Health Econ 19 (2010), 596–607.
3. [3] Dolan, P., Shaw, R., Tsuchiya, A., Williams, A., QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature. Health Econ 14 (2005), 197–208.
4. [4] Gyrd-Hansen, D., Investigating the social value of health changes. J Health Econ 23 (2004), 1101–1116.
5. [5] Lancsar, E., Wildman, J., Donaldson, C., et al. Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments. J Health Econ 30 (2011), 466–478.
6. [6] Exel, J.V., Baker, R., Mason, H., et al. Public views on principles for health care priority setting: Findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology. Soc Sci Med 126 (2015), 128–137.
7. [7] Torrance, G.W., Utility measurement in healthcare. The things I never got to. Pharmacoeconomics 24 (2006), 1069–1078.
8. [8] Horsman, K., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G., The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 1, 2003, 54.
9. [9] Bleichrodt, H., A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities. Health Econ 11 (2002), 447–456.
10. [10] Nord, E., The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programs. Med Decis Making 15 (1995), 201–208.
11. [11] Ubel, P.A., How stable are people's preferences for giving priority to severely ill patients?. Soc Sci Med 49 (1999), 1049–1055.
12. [12] Johannesson, M., Jonsson, B., Karlsson, G., Outcome measurement in economic evaluation. Health Econ 5 (1996), 279–296.
13. [13] Parkin, D., Devlin, N., Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis?. Health Econ 15 (2006), 653–664.