An image-based approach for the Co-registration of multi-temporal UAV image datasets

Remote Sensing

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2016, Pages

  Aicardi, Irene ^a   Nex, Francesco ^b   Gerke, Markus ^b   Lingua, Andrea Maria ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

High resolution image; Image blocks registration; Image based approach; Multi temporal datasets; Photogrammetry; UAVs

Indexed keywords

PHOTOGRAMMETRY; ROCK MECHANICS;

BUNDLE BLOCK ADJUSTMENTS; EXTERIOR ORIENTATION PARAMETERS; GROUND CONTROL POINTS; HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGE; IMAGE BLOCKS; IMAGE GEO-REFERENCING; IMAGE-BASED; MULTI-TEMPORAL;

UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

EID: 85013660430     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs8090779     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. El-Omari, S.; Moselhi, O. Integrating automated data acquisition technologies for progress reporting of construction projects. Autom. Constr. 2011, 20, 699-705
2. Matikainen, L.; Hyyppa, J.; Kaartinen, H. Automatic detection of changes from laser scanner and aerial image data for updating building maps. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2004, 35, 434-439
3. Champion, N. 2D building change detection from high resolution aerial images and correlation digital surface models. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2007, 36, 197-202
4. Adams, B.J. Improved disaster management through post-earthquake building damage assessment using multi-temporal satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the ISPRS XXth Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, 12-23 July 2004; Volume 35, pp. 12-23. Available online: http://cartesia.es/geodoc/isprs2004/comm7/papers/121.pdf (accessed on 23 June 2016)
5. Masini, N.; Lasaponara, R. On the use of Multisensor and multitemporal data for monitoring risk degradation and looting in archaeological site. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference, Vienna, Austria, 12-17 April 2015; Volume 17
6. Rutzinger, M.; Rüf, B.; Vetter, M.; Höfle, B. Change detection of building footprints from airborne laser scanning acquired in short time intervals. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Commission VII Mid-Term Symposium-'100 Years ISPRS-Advancing Remote Sensing Science', Vienna, Austria, 5-7 July 2010; Volume XXXVIII
7. Durieux, L.; Lagabrielle, E.; Nelson, A. A method for monitoring building construction in urban sprawl areas using object-based analysis of Spot 5 images and existing GIS data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2008, 63, 399-408
8. Memon, Z.A.; Abd Majid, M.Z.; Mustaffar, M. Utilization of photogrammetry techniques to digitalize the construction site progress. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Construction Information Technology, Langkawi, Malaysia, 18-21 February 2004; pp. 18-21
9. Gerke, M.; Kerle, N. Automatic structural seismic damage assessment with airborne oblique Pictometry imagery. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2011, 77, 885-898
10. Murtiyoso, A.; Remondino, F.; Rupnik, E.; Nex, F.; Grussenmeyer, P. Oblique aerial photography tool for building inspection and damage assessment. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2014, 40, 309-313
11. Chiabrando, F.; Nex, F.; Piatti, D.; Rinaudo, F. UAV and RPV systems for photogrammetric surveys in archaelogical areas: Two tests in the Piedmont region (Italy). J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011, 38, 697-710
12. Balletti, C.; Guerra, F.; Scocca, V.; Gottardi, C. 3D integrated methodologies for the documentation and the virtual reconstruction of an archaeological site. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015, 40, 215-222
13. Aicardi, I.; Garbarino, M.; Lingua, A.; Lingua, E.; Marzano, R.; Piras, M. Monitoring post-fire forest recovery using multi-temporal Digital Surface Models generated from different platforms. EARSeL eProc. 2016, 15, 1-8
14. Everaerts, J. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for remote sensing and mapping. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2008, 37, 1187-1192
15. Colomina, I.; Molina, P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 92, 79-97
16. Eisenbeiß, H. UAV Photogrammetry. Ph.D. Thesis, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, 2009
17. Cook, G. Remote Sensing via UAVS. In Mobile Robots: Navigation, Control and Remote Sensing; JohnWiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 295-300
18. Chiabrando, F.; Lingua, A.M.; Piras, M. Direct photogrammetry using UAV: Tests and first results. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, 1, 81-86
19. Dellaert, F.; Seitz, S.M.; Thorpe, C.E.; Thrun, S. Structure from motion without correspondence. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hilton Head Island, SC, USA, 13-15 June 2000; Volume 2, pp. 557-564
20. Unger, J.; Reich, M.; Heipke, C. UAV-based photogrammetry: Monitoring of a building zone. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2014, 40, 601-606
21. Gülch, E. Photogrammetric evaluation of multi-temporal fixed wing UAV imagery. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2011, 38, 265-270
22. Rosnell, T.; Honkavaara, E.; Nurminen, K. On geometric processing of multi-temporal image data collected by light UAV systems. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2011, 38, 63-68
23. Vallet, J.; Panissod, F.; Strecha, C.; Tracol, M. Photogrammetric performance of an ultra-light weight swinglet UAV. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2012, 38, 253-258
24. Nex, F.; Remondino, F. UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review. Appl. Geomat. 2014, 6, 1-15
25. Kraft, T.; Geßner, M.; Meißner, H.; Cramerb, M.; Gerke, M.; Przybilla, H.J. Evaluation of a Metric Camera System Tailored for High Precision Uav Applications. ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, 41, 901-907
26. Gerke, M.; Przybilla, H.-J. Accuracy analysis of photogrammetric UAV image blocks: Influence of onboard RTK-GNSS and cross flight patterns. Photogramm. Fernerkund. Geoinf. 2016, 1, 17-30
27. Rehak, M.; Mabillard, R.; Skaloud, J. A micro-UAV with the capability of direct georeferencing. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, 40, 317-323
28. Zitová, B.; Flusser, J. Image registration methods: A survey. Image Vis. Comput. 2003, 21, 977-1000
29. Sheng, Y.; Shah, C.A.; Smith, L.C. Automated image registration for hydrologic change detection in the lake-rich arctic. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2008, 5, 414-418
30. Behling, R.; Roessner, S.; Segl, K.; Kleinschmit, B.; Kaufmann, H. Robust automated image co-registration of optical multi-sensor time series data: Database generation for multi-temporal landslide detection. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 2572-2600
31. Zhao, C.; Goshtasby, A.A. Registration of multitemporal aerial optical images using line features. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2016, 117, 149-160
32. Wong, A.; Clausi, D.A. ARRSI: Automatic registration of remote-sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45, 1483-1493
33. Vakalopoulou, M.; Karantzalos, K.; Komodakis, N.; Paragios, N. Simultaneous registration and change detection in multitemporal, very high resolution remote sensing data. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Boston, MA, USA, 7-12 June 2015; pp. 61-69
34. Song, Y.; Yuan, X.; Xu, H. A multi-temporal image registration method based on edge matching and maximum likelihood estimation sample consensus. Int. Arch. PRSSI Sci. 2008, 37, 61-66
35. Aicardi, I.; Nyapwere, N.; Nex, F.; Gerke, M.; Lingua, A.M.; Koeva, M.N. Co-registration of multitemporal UAV image datasets for monitoring applications: A new approach. In Proceedings of the ISPRS XXIII Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 12-19 July 2016
36. Gerke, M.; Nex, F.; Remondino, F.; Jacobsen, K.; Kremer, J.; Karel,W.; Ostrowski,W. Orientation of oblique airborne image sets-experiences from the ISPRS/EUROSDR benchmark on multi-platform photogrammetry. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, 41, 185-191
37. Aicardi, I.; Chiabrando, F.; Grasso, N.; Lingua, A.M.; Noardo, F. UAV photogrammetry with oblique images: First analysis on data acquisition and processing. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, 41, 835-842
38. Wallis, R. An approach to the space variant restoration and enhancement of images. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Current Mathematical Problems in Image Science, Monterey, CA, USA, 10-12 November 1976; pp. 329-340
39. Lowe, D.G. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2004, 60, 91-110
40. Akkiraju, N.; Edelsbrunner, H.; Facello, M.; Fu, P.; Mücke, E.P.; Varela, C. Alpha shapes: Definition and software. In Proceedings of the 1st International Computational Geometry SoftwareWorkshop, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 20 January 1995; Volume 63, pp. 63-66
41. Pix4D. version 2.2. UAV mapping software. Pix4D SA: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2016. Available online: https://pix4d.com/(accessed on 21 March 2016)
42. Lingua, A.; Marenchino, D.; Nex, F. Performance analysis of the SIFT operator for automatic feature extraction and matching in photogrammetric applications. Sensors 2009, 9, 3745-3766