Visual restitution training after lesion of the optic nerve

Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Psychologie

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 131-141

  Wust S ^a   Kasten, E ^b   Sabel, B A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MAGDEBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Optic nerve; Partial blindness; Visual acuity; Visual field; Visual training

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013617788     PISSN: 09405569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Balliett, R., Blood, K.M. & Bach-y-Rita, P. (1985). Visuel field rehabilitation in the cortically blind? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 48, 1113-1124.
2. Bashinski, H.S. & Bacharach, V.R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the re sult of selectively attending to spatial locations. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 241-248.
3. Chino, Y.M., Kaas, J.H., Smith III, E.L., Langston, A.L. & Cheng, H. (1992). Rapid reorganization of cortical maps in adult cats following restricted deafferentation in retina. Vision Research, 32, 789-796.
4. Chino, Y.M. (1999). The role of visual experience in the cortical topographic map reorganization following retinal lesions. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 15, 165-176.
5. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F.M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G.L. & Petersen, S.E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed, Functional anatomy by Positron Emission Tomography. The Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2383-2402.
6. Duvdevani, R., Rosner, M., Belkin, M., Sautter, J., Sabel, B.A. & Schwartz, M. (1990). Graded crush of the rat optic nerve as a brain injury model, combining electrophysicological and behavioral outcome. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 2, 31-38.
7. Eysel, U.T. (1994). Receptive field plasticity at the border of ibotenic acid lesions in adult cat visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 192.
8. Eysel, U.T., Gonzalez-Aguilar, F. & Mayer, U. (1980). A functional sign of reorganization in the visual system of adult cats, lateral geniculate neurons with displaced receptive fields after lesions of the nasal retina. Brain Research, 181, 285-300.
9. Eysel, U., Schweigart, G., Mittmann, T., Eyding, D. & Qu, Y. (1999). Reorganization in the visual cortex after retinal and cortical damage. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 15, 153-165.
10. Feinstein, A., Brown, R. & Ron, M. (1994). Effects of practice of serial tests of attention in healthy subjects. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 436-447.
11. Galambros, R.T., Norton, T.T. & Frommer, G.P. (1967). Optic tract lesions sparing pattern vision in cats. Experimental Neurology, 18, 8-25.
12. Gilbert, C.D. & Wiesel, T.N. (1983). Clustered intrinsic connections in cat visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 3, 1116-1133.
13. Gilbert, C.D. & Wiesel, T.N. (1992). Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex. Nature, 356, 150-152.
14. Hanke, J. (2002). Anatomical correlations of intrinsic axon repair after partial optic nerve crush in rats. Annual Anatomy, 184(2), 113-123.
15. Heinze, H.J., Mangun, G.R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Münte, T.F., Gös, A., Scherg, M., Johannes, S., Hundeshagen, H., Gazzaniga, M.S. & Hillyard, S.A. (1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attantion in humans. Nature, 372, 543-546.
16. Julkunen, L., Tenovuo, O., Jääskeläinen, S. & Hämäläinen, H. (2003). Rehabilitation of chronic post-stroke visual field defect with computer-assisted training-A clinical and neuropsychological study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 21, 19-28.
17. Kaas, J.H. & Florence, S.L. (1997). Mechanism of reorganization in sensory systems of primates after peripheral nerve injury. In H.-J.
18. Freund, B.A. Sabel & O.W. Witte (Eds.), Brain plasticity, Advances in Neurology. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia.
19. Kaas, J.H., Krubitzer, L.A., Chino, Y.M., Langston, A.L., Polley, E.H. & Blair, N. (1990). Reorganization of retinotopic cortical maps in adult mammals after lesions of the retina. Science, 248, 229-231.
20. Kasten, E. & Sabel, B.A. (1995). Visual fields enlargement after computer training in brain demaged patients with homonymous deficits, an open pilot trial. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 8, 113-127.
21. Kasten, E., Strasburger, H. & Sabel, B.A. (1997). Programs for diagnosis and therapy of visual deficits in vision rehabilitation. Spatial Vision, 10, 499-503.
22. Kasten, E., Wuest, S. Behrens-Baumann, W.& Sabel, B.A. (1998). Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness. Nature Medicine, 4, 1083-1087.
23. Kasten, E., Gothe, J., Bunzenthal, U. & Sabel, B.A. (1999a). Kampimetrische Untersuchung visueller Funktionen am Computermonitor. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 207, 97-118.
24. Kasten, E. (1999b). Diagnose und Behandlung zerebraler Sehstörungen. Aachen: Shaker-Verlag.
25. Kasten, E. & Sabel, B.A. (2001). Stability of visual field enlargement following computerbased restitution training in patients with cerebral damage--Results of a follow-up study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 297-305.
26. Kerkhoff, G., Schaub, & Zihl, J. (1990). Die Anamnese zerebral bedingter Sehstörungen. Nervenarzt, 61, 711-718.
27. Mangun, G.R. (1995). Neural mechanism of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32, 4-18.
28. Müller, I., Kasten, E. & Sabel, B.A. (2003). Identifying training potential in patients with visual field defects. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (JINS), 9 (4), 10.
29. Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
30. Robertson, I. (1990). Does computerized rehabilitation work ? A review. Aphasiology, 4, 381-405.
31. Sautter, J. & Sabel, B.A. (1993). Recovery of brightness discrimination in adult rats despite progressive loss of retrogradely labelled retinal ganglion cells after controlled optiv nerve crush. European Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 680-690.
32. Sautter, J., Schwartz, M., Duvdevani, R. & Sabel, B.A. (1991). GM1 ganglioside treatment reduces visual deficits after graded crush of the rat optic nerve. Brain Research, 565, 23-33.
33. Schmielau, F. (1988). Psychologische Aspekte zerebrovaskulärer Insuffizienz. In R.M.
34. Schütz & F.W. Schildberg (Eds.), Supraaortale Arterien (Pathophysiologie-Diagnostik-Therapie), 41-49.
35. Schmielau, F. (1989). Restitution visueller Funktionen bei hirnverletzten Patienten, Effizienz lokalisationsspezifischer sensorischer und sensomotorischer Rehabilitationsmaßnahmen. In P. Jacobi (Eds.), Jahrbuch der Medizinischen Psycholologie 2-Psychologie in der Neurologie (115-126). Berlin: Springer.
36. Schmielau, F. & Potthoff, R.D. (1990). Erholung von Sehfunktionen als Folge spezifischer Rehabilitationsverfahren bei hirngeschädigten Patienten. Bericht 37. Kongreß der DGfP, Kiel, 123-124.
37. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C.A. & Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. Neuropsychologia, 25, 55-71.
38. Wert, R. & Moehrenschlager, M. (1999). The development of visual functions in cerebrally blind children during a systematic visual field training. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 15, 229-242.
39. Zihl, J. (1980). Untersuchung von Sehfunktionen bei Patienten mit einer Schädigung der zentralen visuellen Systems unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Restitution dieser Funktionen- Habilitationsschrift. München.
40. Zihl, J. & Cramon, D. v. (1985). Visual field recovery from skotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage. A review of 55 cases. Brain, 108, 335-365.