Epistemological perspectives on ontology-based theories for conceptual modeling

Applied Ontology

Volumn 3, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 111-130

  Recker, Jan ^a   Niehaves, Björn ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conceptual modeling; Epistemology; Ontology; Representation theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013610301     PISSN: 15705838     EISSN: 18758533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/AO-2008-0045     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Agerfalk, P.J. & Eriksson, O. (2004). Action-oriented conceptual modelling. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(1), 80-92.
2. Angeles, P.A. (1981). Dictionary of Philosophy. New York: Barnes & Noble.
3. Aristotle (1991). The Metaphysics (Translated by John H. McMahon). Great Books in Philosophy. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
4. Avison, D.E. & Fitzgerald, G. (1995). Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools (2nd edn). London: McGraw-Hill.
5. Becker, J. & Niehaves, B. (2007). Epistemological perspectives on is research - a framework for analyzing and systematizing epistemological assumptions. Information Systems Journal, 17(2), 197-214.
6. Becker, J., Niehaves, B. & Algermissen, L. (2005a). Epistemological perspectives on multi-methodological electronic government research. In M. Khosrow-Pour (ed.), 16th IRMA International Conference (pp. 258-261). San Diego, CA: Idea Group.
7. Becker, J., Niehaves, B. & Klose, K. (2005b). A framework for epistemological perspectives on simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 8(4).
8. Benbasat, I. & Weber, R. (1996). Research commentary: Rethinking "diversity" in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 389-399.
9. Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City: Doubleday.
10. Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M. & Weber, R. (2001). Should optional properties be used in conceptual modelling? A theory and three empirical tests. Information Systems Research, 12(4), 384-405.
11. Bowen, P.L., O’Farrell, R.A & Rohde, F. (2006). Analysis of competing data structures: Does ontological clarity produce better end user query performance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(8), 514-544.
12. Bunge, M.A. (1977). Treatise on Basic Philosophy Volume 3: Ontology I - The Furniture of the World. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Bunge, M.A. (1979). Treatise on Basic Philosophy Volume 4: Ontology II - A World of Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Bunge, M.A. (2003). Philosophical Dictionary. New York: Prometheus Books.
15. Burrell, G. &Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Brookfield: Ashgate Publishing.
16. Burton-Jones, A. &Meso, P. (2006). Conceptualizing systems for understanding: An empirical test of decomposition principles in object-oriented analysis. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 38-60.
17. Butler, T. (1998). Towards a hermeneutic method for interpretive research in information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 285-300.
18. Chen, W.S. & Hirschheim, R. (2004). A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Information Systems Journal, 14(3), 197-235.
19. Chisholm, R.M. (1996). A Realistic Theory of Categories: An Essay on Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
20. Collier, A. (1994). Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy. London: Verso.
21. Davies, I., Green, P., Milton, S. & Rosemann, M. (2005). Analysing and comparing ontologies with meta models. In J. Krogstie, T. Halpin & K. Siau (eds), Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies (pp. 1-16). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
22. Dobson, P.J. (2002). Critical realism and information systems research: Why bother with philosophy. Information Research, 7(2).
23. Evermann, J. (2005). Towards a cognitive foundation for knowledge representation. Information Systems Journal, 15(2), 147-178.
24. Falconer, D.J. & Mackay, D.R. (2000). The myth of multiple methods. In H.M. Chung (ed.), 6th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1467-1473), Longbeach, CA. Association for Information Systems.
25. Fettke, P. & Loos, P. (2007). Ontological evaluation of scheer’s reference model for production planning and control systems. Journal of Interoperability in Business Information Systems, 2(1), 9-28.
26. Fitzgerald, B. & Howcroft, D. (1998). Competing dichotomies in is research and possible strategies for resolution. In J.I. De Gross, R. Hirschheim & M. Newman (eds), 19th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 155-164), Helsinki. Association for Information Systems.
27. Gadamer, H.-G. (1976). Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28. Gemino, A. & Wand, Y. (2005). Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55(3), 301-326.
29. Green, P. & Rosemann, M. (2000). Integrated process modeling. an ontological evaluation. Information Systems, 25(2), 73-87.
30. Green, P. & Rosemann, M. (2001). Ontological analysis of integrated process models: Testing hypotheses. The Australian Journal of Information Systems, 9(1), 30-38.
31. Green, P. & Rosemann, M. (2004). Applying ontologies to business and systems modeling techniques and perspectives: Lessons learned. Journal of Database Management, 15(2), 105-117.
32. Greer, S. (1969). The Logic of Social Inquiry. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
33. Gruber, T.R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.
34. Guarino, N. & Guizzardi, G. (2006). In the defense of ontological foundations for conceptual modeling. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), 115-126.
35. Guarino, N. & Welty, C. (2002). Evaluating ontological decisions with ontoclean. Communications of the ACM, 45(2), 61-65.
36. Guizzardi, G. (2005). Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models, Telematica Instituut Fundamental Research Series, Vol. 015. Enschede: Telematica Instituut.
37. Hirschheim, R. (1985). Information systems epistemology: An historical perspective. In E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald & A.T.Wood-Harper (eds), Research Methods in Information Systems (pp. 13-35). Amsterdam: North Holland.
38. Hirschheim, R. & Klein, H.K. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1199-1216.
39. Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K. & Lyytinen, K. (1996). Exploring the intellectual structure of information systems development: A social action theoretic analysis. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 6(1/2), 1-64.
40. Holsapple, C.W. & Joshi, K.D. (2002). A collaborative approach to ontology design. Communications of the ACM, 45(2), 42-47.
41. Hull, R. & King, R. (1987). Semantic database modeling: Survey, applications, and research issues. ACM Computing Surveys, 19(3), 201-260.
42. Iivari, J. (1991). A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of is development. European Journal of Information Systems, 1(4), 249-272.
43. Kant, I. (1929). The Critique of Pure Reason (translated by Norman Kemp Smith). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
44. Karimi, J. (1988). Strategic planning for information systems: Requirements and information engineering methods. Journal of Management Information Systems, 4(4), 5-24.
45. Kautz, K., Wyssusek, B., Lyytinen, K., Milton, S., Kazmierczak, E., Opdahl, A.L., Krogstie, J., Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G., Wand, Y. &Weber, R. (2006). Debate section: "On ontological foundations of conceptual modelling". Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), 61-152.
46. Kirkham, R.L. (1992). Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47. Klaus, H. &Wyssusek, B. (2005). Ontological foundations of information systems analysis and design: Extending the scope of the discussion. In P. Green & M. Rosemann (eds), Business Systems Analysis with Ontologies (pp. 322-344). Hershey, PA: IDEA Group.
48. Klein, H.K. & Lyytinen, K. (1985). The poverty of scientism in information systems. In E.Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald & A.T. Wood-Harper (eds), Research Methods in Information Systems (pp. 123-151). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
49. Kottemann, J.E. & Konsynski, B.R. (1984). Information systems planning and development: Strategic postures and methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1(2), 45-63.
50. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G. & Jørgensen, H.D. (2006). Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(1), 91-102.
51. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
52. Kühne, T. (2006). Matters of (meta-) modeling. Software and Systems Modeling, 5(4), 369-385.
53. Landry, M. & Banville, C. (1992). A disciplined methodological pluralism for mis research. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 2(2), 77-97.
54. Lauesen, S. & Vinter, O. (2001). Preventing requirement defects: An experiment in process improvement. Requirements Engineering, 6(1), 37-50.
55. Lee, A.S. (1991). Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research. Organization Science, 2(4), 342-365.
56. Lee, A.S. (2001). Editor’s comments: Mis quarterly’s editorial policies and practices. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), iii-vii.
57. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G. & Sølvberg, A. (1994). Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software, 11(2), 42-49.
58. Losee, J. (2001). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Loucopoulos, P. & Zicari, R. (1992). Conceptual Modeling, Databases, and Case: An Integrated View of Information Systems Development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
60. Lyytinen, K. (2006). "Ontological foundations of conceptual modeling" by Boris Wyssysek - a critical response. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), 81-84.
61. McGrath, K. (2005). Doing critical research in information systems: a case of theory and practice not informing each other. Information Systems Journal, 15(2), 85-101.
62. Merton, R.K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
63. Milton, S. (2007). Ontological foundations of representational information systems. An Australian perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(1), 109-134.
64. Milton, S. & Kazmierczak, E. (2004). An ontology of data modelling languages: A study using a common-sense realistic ontology. Journal of Database Management, 15(2), 19-38.
65. Milton, S. & Kazmierczak, E. (2006). Ontology as meta-theory: A perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), 85-94.
66. Mingers, J. (2004). Realizing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14(2), 87-103.
67. Mingers, J. & Stowell, F., eds (1997). Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? London: McGraw-Hill.
68. Monod, E. (2002). For a Kantian foundation of is research: Proposals for an epistemological pluralism. In R. Ramsower, J.Windsor & J.I. De Gross (eds), 8th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1751-1759), Dallas, TX. Association for Information Systems.
69. Monod, E. (2003). A Copernican revolution in is: Using Kant’s critique of pure reason for describing epistemological trends in is. In J.W. Ross (ed.), 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 2719-2724), Tampa, FL. Association for Information Systems.
70. Moody, D.L. & Shanks, G. (2003). Improving the quality of data models: Empirical validation of a quality management framework. Information Systems, 28(6), 619-650.
71. Neimeyer, R.A. (1998). Social constructionism in the counselling context. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 11(2), 135-150.
72. Niehaves, B. (2005). Epistemological perspectives on multi-method information systems research. In D. Bartman, F. Rajola, J. Kallinikos, D.E. Avison, R. Winter, P. Ein-Dor, J. Becker, F. Bodendorf & C. Weinhardt (eds), 13th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1584-1595), Regensburg, Germany. Association for Information Systems.
73. Niehaves, B. (2007). Epistemological perspectives on design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 99-110.
74. Nissen, H.-E., Klein, H.K. & Hirschheim, R., eds (1991). Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Tradition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
75. Olivé, A. (1983). Analysis of conceptual and logical models in information systems design methodologies. In T.W. Olle, H.G. Sol & C.J. Tully (eds), Information System Design Methodologies: A Feature Analysis (pp. 63-85). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
76. Opdahl, A.L. & Henderson-Sellers, B. (2002). Ontological evaluation of the UML using the Bunge-Wand-Weber model. Software and Systems Modeling, 1(1), 43-67.
77. Orlikowski, W.J. & Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28.
78. Parsons, J. & Cole, L. (2004). An experimental examination of property precedence in conceptual modelling. In S. Hartmann & J.F. Roddick (eds), 1st Asian-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (Vol. 59, pp. 101-110), Dunedin, New Zealand. Australian Computer Society.
79. Popper, K.R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
80. Recker, J. (2005). Developing ontological theories for conceptual models using qualitative research. In J. Beekhuyzen (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Qualitative Research in IT & IT in Qualitative Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
81. Recker, J. & Indulska, M. (2007). An ontology-based evaluation of process modeling with petri nets. Journal of Interoperability in Business Information Systems, 2(1), 45-64.
82. Rescher, N. (1973). The Primacy of Practice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
83. Rosemann, M., Green, P. & Indulska, M. (2004). A reference methodology for conducting ontological analyses. In H. Lu, W. Chu, P. Atzeni, S. Zhou & T.W. Ling (eds), 23rd International Conference on Conceptual Modeling: Conceptual Modeling - ER 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3288, pp. 110-121). Shanghai: Springer.
84. Siau, K. (2004). Informational and computational equivalence in comparing information modeling methods. Journal of Database Management, 15(1), 73-86.
85. Siau, K. & Rossi, M. (1998). Evaluation of information modeling methods - a review. In D. Dolk (ed.), 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 314-322), Kohala Coast, HI. IEEE Computer Society.
86. Siau, K. & Tan, X. (2005). Improving the quality of conceptual modeling using cognitive mapping techniques. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55(3), 343-365.
87. Siau, K. & Wang, Y. (2007). Cognitive evaluation of information modeling methods. Information and Software Technology, 49(5), 455-474.
88. Staab, S., Studer, R., Schnurr, H.-P. & Sure, Y. (2001). Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(1), 26-34.
89. Tarski, A. (1944). The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4(3), 341-375.
90. Uschold, M. & Grüninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93-136.
91. Veres, C. & Mansson, G. (2005). Cognition and modeling: Foundations for research and practice. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 7(1), 93-104.
92. Vessey, I., Ramesh, V. & Glass, R.L. (2002). Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 129-174.
93. von Glasersfeld, E. (2001). The radical constructivist view of science. Foundations of Science, 6(1-3), 31-43.
94. Wade, M. & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107-142.
95. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in is research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74-81.
96. Wand, Y. (1996). Ontology as a foundation for meta-modelling and method engineering. Information and Software Technology, 38(4), 281-287.
97. Wand, Y., Storey, V.C. & Weber, R. (1999). An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24(4), 494-528.
98. Wand, Y. & Wang, R.Y. (1996). Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM, 39(11), 86-95.
99. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1988). An ontological analysis of some fundamental information systems concepts. In J.I. De Gross & M.H. Olson (eds), 9th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 213-226), Minneapolis, MN. Association for Information Systems.
100. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1989a). A model of systems decomposition. In J.I. De Gross, J.C. Henderson & B.R. Konsynski (eds), 10th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 41-51). Boston, MA: ACM Press.
101. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1989b). An ontological evaluation of systems analysis and design methods. In E.D. Falkenberg & P. Lindgreen (eds), Information System Concepts: An In-depth Analysis. Proceedings of the IFIP TC 8/WG 8.1 Working Conference on Information System Concepts (pp. 79-107). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
102. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1990a). Mario Bunge’s ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts. In P. Weingartner & G.J.W. Dorn (eds), Studies on Mario Bunge’s Treatise (pp. 123-149). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
103. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1990b). An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(11), 1282-1292.
104. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1990c). Towards a theory of the deep structure of information systems. In J.I. De Gross, M. Alavi & H. Oppelland (eds), 11th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 61-71), Copenhagen, Denmark. ACMPress.
105. Wand, Y. &Weber, R. (1993). On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Journal of Information Systems, 3(4), 217-237.
106. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (1995). On the deep structure of information systems. Information Systems Journal, 5(3), 203-223.
107. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (2002). Research commentary: Information systems and conceptual modeling - a research agenda. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 363-376.
108. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (2004). Reflection: Ontology in information systems. Journal of Database Management, 15(2), iii-vi.
109. Wand, Y. & Weber, R. (2006). On ontological foundations of conceptual modeling: A response to Wyssusek. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), 127-138.
110. Weber, R. (1997a). The link between data modeling approaches and philosophical assumptions: A critique. In J.N.D. Gupta (ed.), 3rd Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 306-308), Indianapolis, IN. Association for Information Systems.
111. Weber, R. (1997b). Ontological Foundations of Information Systems. Melbourne, Australia: Coopers & Lybrand and the Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand.
112. Weber, R. (2003). Conceptual modelling and ontology: Possibilities and pitfalls. Journal of Database Management, 14(3), 1-20.
113. Weber, R. (2004). Editor’s comments: The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), iii-xii.
114. Weber, R. & Zhang, Y. (1996). An analytical evaluation of NIAM’s grammar for conceptual schema diagrams. Information Systems Journal, 6(2), 147-170.
115. Wicks, A.C. & Freeman, R.E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9(2), 123-140.
116. Wynekoop, J.L. & Russo, N.L. (1997). Studying systems development methodologies: An examination of research methods. Information Systems Journal, 7(1), 47-66.
117. Wyssusek, B. (2006). On ontological foundations of conceptual modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 18(1), 63-80.
118. Young, J.W. & Kent, H.K. (1958). Abstract formulation of data processing problems. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 9(6), 471-479.