Hierarchies in object oriented conceptual modeling

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2426 LNCS, Issue , 2002, Pages 24-33

  Marcos, Esperanza ^a   Cavero, Jose María ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Multiple Inheritance; Object Orient; State Taxonomy; Taxonomic Hierarchy; Teacher Student

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; TAXONOMIES; TEACHING;

CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CONCEPTUAL MODELLING; MULTIPLE INHERITANCE; OBJECT ORIENTED; OBJECT ORIENTS; SPECIALISATION; TAXONOMIC HIERARCHY;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 85013607861     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46105-1_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Al-Ahmad, W. and Steegmans, E. (1999), Modeling and Reuse Perspectives of Inheritance Can be Reconciled. In Proc. of the Technology of Object Oriented Languages and Systems (TOOLS’99) Ed. Chen, Lu and Meyer, IEEE, pag. 31-41.
2. Atkinson, M.P., Bancilhon, F., Dittrich, K.R., Maier, D. and Zdonik, S. (1989), The object-oriented database system manifesto, in: Proc. of the International Conference on Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases (DOOD’89).
3. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J. and Jacobson, I. (1999), The Unified Modelling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley.
4. Firesmith, D. (1995), The Inheritance of State Models. Report on Object Analysis and Design, March-April, pag.13-15.
5. Maier, D. and Zdonik, S. (1989), Fundamentals of object-oriented databases, in: Readings in Object Oriented Database Management Systems. Maier and Zdonik, Morgan Kauffman.
6. Marcos, E. (2001). Defining taxonomic hierarchies: their implications for multiple inheritance. In Proceedings of the 13th. International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering (SEKE’2001). Knowledge Systems Institute, Sokokie, IL (USA), pag. 336-340.
7. Maughan, G. and Durnota, B. (1994), MON: An Object Relationship Model Incorporating Roles, Classification, Publicity and Assertions, in: Proc. of the International Conference on Object Oriented Information Systems (OOIS’94). Ed. by Patel, Sun and Patel, Spring Verlag, pag. 166-180.
8. Meseguer, J. (1993), Solving the Inheritance Anomaly in Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming, in: Proc. of the European Conference on Object Oriented Programming (ECOOP’93), Springer Verlag.
9. Pirotte, A., Zimányi, E., Massart, D. and Yakusheva, T. (1994), Materialization: a powerful and ubiquitous abstraction pattern, in: Proc. of the International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB’94). Ed. by Bocca, Jarke and Zaniolo. Morgan Kaufmann, pag. 630-641.
10. Sloman, S.A. (1998), Categorical Inference Is Not a Tree: The Myth of Inheritance Hierarchies, Cognitive Psychology 35, No. 1, pag. 1-33.
11. Snoeck, M. and Dedene, G. (1996), Generalization/ speciali-zation and role in object oriented conceptual modeling. Data & Knowledge Engineering 19, pag. 171-195.
12. Taivalsaari, A. (1996), On the Notion of Inheritance. ACM Computing Surveys, Vol.28, No.3, Pag. 438-479.
13. Wang, Y., Storey, V.C., and Weber, R. (1999), An Ontological Analysis of the Relationship Constructor in Conceptual Modeling. ACM TODS 24(4), pag. 494-528.
14. Wieringa, R., De Jonge, W. and Spruit, P. (1995), Using Dynamic Classes and Role Classes to Model Object Migration. Theory and Practice of Software Systems, Vol.1(1), pag. 61-83.