Ontological realism: Methodology or misdirection?

Applied Ontology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 79-108

  Merrill, Gary H ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Empiricism; Metaphysics; Ontological methodology; Ontology; Realism

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013586322     PISSN: 15705838     EISSN: 18758533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/AO-2010-0076     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Armstrong, D.M. (1978). A Theory of Universals: Universals and Scientific Realism Volume II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Armstrong, D.M. (1989). Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
3. Armstrong, D.M. (2008). Universals as attributes. In M.J. Loux (Ed.), Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge.
4. Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20-40. Reprinted in the Supplement to Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, Enlarged edn, University of Chicago Press, 1956.
5. Carnap, R. (1988). Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Ceusters, W. (2000). Language, medical terminologies and structured electronic patient records: How to escape the Bermuda triangle. In G. De Moor & E. De Clercq (Eds), Proceedings of the Medisch Informatica Congress (MIC-2000), November 2000, Brugge.
7. Ceusters, W. (2006). Towards a realism-based metric for quality assurance in ontology matching. In B. Bennett & C. Fellbaum (Eds), Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Proceedings of FOIS-2006, November 9-11, Baltimore, MD (pp. 321-332). New York: IOS Press.
8. Ceusters, W. (2008). Applying evolutionary terminology auditing to the gene ontology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42, 518-529.
9. Ceusters, W. (2009a). Providing a realist perspective on the eyeGENE database system. Nature Precedings (Online). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3467.1.
10. Ceusters, W. (2009b). Referent tracking literature. Available on the web site of the Referent Tracking Unit of the Ontology Research Group at the New York State Center for Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, http://www.referenttracking.com/RTU/?page=papers.phtml.
11. Ceusters, W. & Anonymous (2008). Reviewers’ comments and responses to (Ceusters, 2008). Available at: http://www.referenttracking.com/RTU/sendfile/?file=ReviewsAndResponses.pdf.
12. Ceusters, W. & Smith, B. (2005). Referent tracking in electronic healthcare records. In R. Englebrecht, A. Geissbuhler & C. Lovis (Eds), Connecting Medical Informatics and Bio-Informatics (pp. 71-76). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
13. Ceusters, W. & Smith, B. (2006a). A realism-based approach to the evolution of biomedical ontologies. In Proceedings of the Annual AMIA Symposium (pp. 121-125). Washington, DC: American Medical Informatics Association.
14. Ceusters, W. & Smith, B. (2006b). Referent tracking for treatment optimisation in schizophrenic patients: A case study in applying philosophical ontology to diagnostic algorithms. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web (Online), 4(3), 229-236.
15. Ceusters, W. & Smith, B. (2006c). Strategies for referent tracking in electronic health records. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39, 362-378.
16. Ceusters, W. & Smith, B. (2007). Referent tracking for digital rights management. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 2(1) 45-53.
17. Ceusters, W., Elkin, P. & Smith, B. (2007a). Negative findings in electronic health records and biomedical ontologies: A realist approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(Suppl.), s326-s333.
18. Ceusters, W., Smith, B. & Flanagan, J. (2003). Ontology and medical terminology: Why description logics are not enough. In Proceedings of the Conference Towards an Electronic Patient Record. Electronic Publication, 10-14 May 2003, San Antonio. Boston, MA: Medical Records Institute.
19. Ceusters, W.M., Spackman, K.A. & Smith, B. (2007b).Would SNOMED CT benefit from realism-based ontology evolution? In Proceedings of the Annual AMIA Symposium (pp. 105-109). Washington, DC: American Medical Informatics Association.
20. Cimino, J.J. (1998). Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods of Information in Medicine, 37, 394-403.
21. Cimino, J.J. (2006). In defense of the desiderata. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39, 299-306.
22. Eberle, R.A. (1970). Nominalistic Systems. Amsterdam: D. Reidel.
23. Fine, A. (1996). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Frege, G. (1997a). Concept and object. In M. Beaney (Ed.), The Frege Reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
25. Frege, G. (1997b). Function and concept. In M. Beaney (Ed.), The Frege Reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26. Frege, G. (1997c). On Sinnand Bedeutung. In M. Beaney (Ed.), The Frege Reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
27. Goodman, N. (1983). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Grenon, P. (2003a). BFO in a nutshell: A bi-categorial axiomatization of BFO and comparison with DOLCE. Technical report, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, December 2003a. INFOMIS Reports, ISSN 1611-4019.
29. Grenon, P. (2003b). Nuts in BFO’s nutshell: Revisions to the bi-categorial axiomatization of BFO and comparison with DOLCE. Technical report, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, December 2003. INFOMIS Reports, ISSN 1611-4019.
30. Grenon, P. & Smith, B. (2004). SNAP and SPAN: Towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 87, 69-103.
31. Guarino, N. & Musen, M. (2005). Applied ontology: Focusing on content. Applied Ontology, 1, 1-5.
32. Guha, R.V. & Lenat, D.B. (1990). Cyc: A midterm report. AI Magazine, 11(3), 32-59.
33. Lehman, F. & Foxvog, D. (1998). Putting flesh on the bones: Issues that arise in creating anatomical knowledge bases with rich relational structure. In G. Merrill & D. Pathak (Eds), Knowledge Sharing Across Biological and Medical Knowledge-Based Systems, July 1998, Madison, WI. American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Papers from the 1998 Workshop: Technical Report WS-98-04, Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
34. Lenat, D.B. & Guha, R.V. (1990). Building Large Knowledge Based Systems. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
35. Lewis, D. (1999). New work for a theory of universals. In Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology (pp. 8-55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Loux, M.J. (2002). Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.
37. Loux, M.J. (Ed.) (2008). Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.
38. Lowe, E.J. (Ed.) (2002). A Survey of Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. McGowan, M.K. (2002). The neglected controversy over metaphysical realism. Philosophy, 77, 5-21.
40. Merrill, G.H. (2006). Engineering a development platform for ontology-enhanced knowledge applications. In R. Sharman, R. Kishore & R. Ramesh (Eds), Ontologies: A Handbook of Principles, Concepts and Applications in Information Systems (Chapter 28). New York: Springer.
41. Merrill, G.H. (2008). The MedDRA paradox. In Proceedings of the Annual AMIA Symposium (pp. 470-474).Washington, DC: American Medical Information Association.
42. Merrill, G.H. (2009). Concepts and synonymy in the UMLS Metathesaurus. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration (Online), 4, 1-37.
43. Murphy, M.L. (2003). Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy, and Other Paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Neuhaus, F., Grenon, P. & Smith, B. (2004). A formal theory of substances, qualities, and universals. In A. Varzi & L. Vieu (Eds), Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the Third International Conference (FOIS 2004). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
45. NISO (2005). Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. National Information Standards Organization (NISO), Bethesda, MD, 2005. ANSI/NISO Z39.19-1993(R1998), available at: http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/pdf/free/455225/Z39-19-2005.pdf.
46. Quine, W.V.O. (1980). From a Logical Point of View, 2nd edn. Boston: Harvard University Press.
47. Quine, W.V.O. (1981). Mathematical Logic, Revised edn. Boston: Harvard University Press.
48. Russell, B. (1967). A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
49. Russell, B. (1985). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Peru, IL: Open Court.
50. Rust, G. & Bide, M. (2000). The (indecs) metadata framework. Technical Report WP1a-006-2.0, Indecs Framework Ltd., June 2000.
51. SIG (2010). Web site for the Foundational Model of Anatomy. Structural Informatics Group of the University of Washington School of Medicine. Available at: http://sig.biostr.washington.edu/projects/fm/AboutFM.html.
52. Smith, B. (2003). Towards industrial-strength philosophy: How analytical ontology can help medical informatics. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 28, 106-111.
53. Smith, B. (2004). Beyond concepts: Ontology as reality representation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2004) (pp. 73-84). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
54. Smith, B. (2005). Against fantology. In M.E. Reicher & J.C. Marek (Eds), Experience and Analysis: Papers of the 27th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Vienna: The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
55. Smith, B. (2006). From concepts to clinical reality: An essay on the benchmarking of biomedical terminologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39, 288-298.
56. Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Köhler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A.L. & Rosse, C. (2005). Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biology, 6(R46).
57. Suppes, P. (1999). Introduction to Logic. New York: Dover.
58. van Fraassen, B.C. (1980). The Scientific Image. London: Oxford University Press.
59. van Fraassen, B.C. (2002). The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
60. van Fraassen, B.C. (2009). Can empiricism leave its realism behind? Toward a dialogue with transcendentalists. In M. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg & J. Petitot (Eds), Constituting Objectivity: Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics. New York: Springer.
61. Zalta, E. (2000). A Leibnizian theory of concepts. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 3, 137-183.
62. Zanstra, P., Rector, A., Ceusters, W. & de Vries Robbé, P. (1998). Coding systems and classifications in healthcare: The link to the record. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 48, 103-109.