Does the choice of link function matter in response propensity modelling?

Model Assisted Statistics and Applications

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 95-100

  Laaksonen, Seppo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

(Complementary) log log; Adjusted sampling weights; Bias in point estimates; Logit; Probit

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013573777     PISSN: 15741699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/mas-2005-1205     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. J. Bethlehem and J.K. Wolter, Linear Weighting of Sample Survey Data, Journal of Official Statistics 3 (1987), 141-155.
2. R.H. Dehejia and S.Wahba, Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reeavaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs, Journal of the American Statistical Association (1999), 1053-1062.
3. J. Dufour, F. Gagnon, Y. Morin, M. Renaud and C.-E. Sarndal, A Better Understanding of Weight Transformation Through a Measure of Change, Survey Methodology 27 (2001), 97-108.
4. A. Ekholm and S. Laaksonen, Weighting via Response Modelling in the Finnish Household Budget Survey, Journal of Official Statistics (1991), 325-337.
5. J.S. Greenless, W.S. Reece and K.D. Zieschang, Imputation of Missing Values When the Probability of Response Depends on the Variable Being Imputed, Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 378 (1982), 251-261.
6. S. Laaksonen, Weighting and Auxiliary Variables in Sample Surveys, in: Enqûe tes et Sondages. Mé thodes, modé les, applications, nouvelles approches, G. Brossier and A.-M. Dussaix, eds, Dunod, Paris, 1999, pp. 168-180.
7. S. Laaksonen and R. Chambers, Survey estimation under informative non-response with follow-up, Southampton, UK, Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, 2004, (S3RI Methodology Working Papers, M05/02) http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/14072/.
8. R.J.A. Little, Survey Nonresponse Adjustments for Estimates of Means, International Statistical Review 54 (1986), 139-157.
9. P. McCullagh and J.A. Nelder, Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed., Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 37, Chapman & Hall, 1989.
10. P.R. Rosenbaum and D.B. Rubin, The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects, Biometrika 70 (1983), 41-55.
11. S. Vartivarian and R. Little, On the Formation of Weighting Class Adjustment Cells for Unit Nonresponse, University of Michigan Biostatistics Department Working Papers 10, 2003.