Federal housing subsidies: Who benefits and why?

A Right to Housing: Foundation for a New Social Agenda

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 105-138

  Dreier, Peter ^a  

^a OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013387909     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (170)

1. Aaron, Henry. 1972. Shelter and subsidies: Who benefits from federal housing policies? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
2. Aaron, Henry, and Harvey Galper. 1985. Assessing tax reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3. Adm'nWins FirstRound of HUD Fight. 1995. Housing Affairs Letter, January 30.
4. Analytic perspectives: Budget of the United States government: Fiscal year 2000. 2000. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5. Anderson Marian, and Peter Dreier. 1993. How the Pentagon redlines America's cities. Planners Network Newsletter, May.
6. Andreassi, Michael, and C. Duncan MacRae. 1981. Homeowner income tax provisions and metropolitan housing markets: A simulation study. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
7. Bier, Thomas, and Ivan Meric. 1994. IRS homeseller provision and urban decline. Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 16, No. 2, 141-154.
8. Birnbaum, Jeffrey, and Alan S. Murray. 1987. Showdown at Gucci Gulch. New York: Random House.
9. Boyer, BrianD. 1973.Cities destroyed for cash. Chicago: Follet Books.
10. Bratt, Rachel G., and W. Dennis Keating. 1993. Federal housing policy and HUD: Past problems and future prospects of a beleaguered bureaucracy. Urban Affairs Revew, Vol. 29, No. 1, 3-27.
11. Brinner, Roger E., David Wyss and Mark Lasky. 1995. Residential real estate impacts of flat tax legislation. Prepared for the National Association of Realtors by DRI/McGraw-Hill, May.
12. Brownstein, Ron. 1995. Republicans wary of land mines surrounding proposal for flat tax. Los Angeles Times, December 18.
13. Brownstein, Ron. 2000. Slow to define his candidacy, Gore attacked from right and left alike. Los Angeles Times, October 30.
14. Burns, Scott. 1998. Home mortgage tax break helps wealthy borrowers most. Houston Chronicle, March 23.
15. Carliner, Michael S. 1998. Development of federal homeownership "policy." Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 9, Issue 2, 299-321.
16. Casey, Connie. 1992. Characteristics of HUD-assisted renters and their units in 1989. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, March.
17. Church, George J. 1993. A call to arms. Time, February 22.
18. Clinton, Bill. 1996. Transcript of remarks by President Clinton to the National Association of Realtors. Washington, DC, April 29.
19. Collins, J. Michael, Eric Belsky and Nicolas Retsinas. 1999. Towards a targeted homeownership tax credit. Cambridge, MA, and Washington, DC: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University and Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, January.
20. Congressional BudgetOffice. 1994.The challenges facing federal rental assistance programs.Washington, DC, December.
21. Congressional BudgetOffice. 1997. Reducing the deficit: Spending and revenue options.Washington, DC, C30.
22. Cooper, Kenneth J. 1994. Gingrich pledges a major package of spending cuts early next year. Washington Post, December 13, A1.
23. Cummings, Jean L., and Denise DiPasquale. 1998. Building affordable rental housing: An analysis of the low-income housing tax credit. Boston: City Research.
24. Davies, Richard O. 1966. Housing reform during the Truman Administration. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
25. DeParle, Jason. 1994.Report toClinton sees vast extent of homelessness. New York Times, February 17.
26. DeParle, Jason. 1996. Slamming the door. New York Times Magazine. October 20, 52ff.
27. Dolbeare, Cushing. 1983. The low-income housing crisis. InAmerica's housing crisis:Whatis to be done?, ed. Chester Hartman. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28. Dolbeare, Cushing. 1996. Housing at a snail's pace. Washington, DC: National Low Income Housing Coalition, August.
29. Dole, Robert. 1996. Remarks by Senate Majority Leader Robert Dole at National Association of Realtors Conference.Washington, DC, April 29.
30. Downey, Kirstin. 1989. New Rockefeller mortgage no garden-variety loan. Washington Post, February 25.
31. Downs, Anthony. 1990.AStrategy for designing a fully comprehensive national homing policy for the federal government to the United States. In Building foundations, eds. Denise DiPasquale and Langley Keyes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32. Dreier, Peter. 1982. The status of tenants in the United States. Social Problems, Vol. 30, No. 2, December.
33. Dreier, Peter. 1984. The tenants movement in the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 8:2. Reprinted in Critical perspectives on housing, eds. Rachel Bratt, Chester Hartman and Ann Meyerson. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986.
34. Dreier, Peter. 1996. Community empowerment strategies: The limits and potential of community organizing in urban neighborhoods. Cityscape Vol. 2, No. 2, 121-159.
35. Dreier, Peter. 2000. Labor's love lost: Rebuilding unions' involvement in federal housing policy. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 11, No. 2, 327-392.
36. Dreier, Peter, and John Atlas. 1992. How to expand homeownership for Americans," Challenge: The Magazine of Economic Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 2, 42-47.
37. Dreier, Peter, and John Atlas. 1997. The mansion subsidy. The New Democrat, Vol. 9, No. 1, January/February.
38. Dreier, Peter, and David Moberg. 1996. Moving from the hood: The mixed success of integrating suburbia. American Prospect, 75-79, Winter.
39. Dreier, Peter, John Mollenkopf and Todd Swanstrom. 2005. Place matters: Metropolitics for the 21st century. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
40. E & Y Kenneth Leventhal Real Estate Group. 1997. The low income housing tax credit: The first decade. Prepared for theNationalCouncil of StateHousing Agencies, Boston, May.
41. Edin, Kathryn, and Laura Lein. 1997. Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and lowwage work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
42. Edsall, Thomas, and Mary Edsall. 1991. Chain reaction. New York: W. W. Norton. "Elimination of mortgage deduction would raise homeownership costs, studies show," 1989. Press release, National Association of Home Builders, March 22.
43. England, Robert. 1992. A crack in the foundation. Mortgage Banking, March.
44. Enterprise Foundation. 1996. Partnerships that perform: The low-income housing tax credit, www.enterprisefoundation/policy/pubpoll.htm
45. Entman, Robert, and AndrewRojecki. 2000. The black image in thewhite mind:Media and race in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Fannie Mae. 1995. Fannie Mae national housing survey: 1995.Washington, DC: Fannie Mae. Fischer, Paul B. n.d., A racial perspective on subsidized housing in the Chicago suburb. Homewood, IL: South Suburban Housing Center.
47. Follain, James, and David C. Ling. 1991. The federal tax subsidy to housing and the reduced value of the mortgage interest deduction. National Tax Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2.
48. Freedman, Leonard. 1969. Public housing: The politics of poverty. New York:
49. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Fried, Joseph P. 1972. Housing crisis U.S. A. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
50. Friedman, Lawrence M. 1968. Government and slum housing: A century of frustration. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
51. Gans, Herbert. 1962. The urban villagers. New York: Free Press.
52. Garner, Michael. 1991.Tax breaks forbrains, not beach houses. USA Today, December 26.
53. Garvey, Megan. 2000. Nader's different, he says, and he's happy to explain just how. Los Angeles Times, November 3. Gephardt, Rep.
54. Richard A. 1995. A Democratic plan forAmerica's economy: Toward a fairer, simpler tax code.Washington, DC: Center for National Policy, July 6.
55. Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Gilliam Jr., Franklin D., Santo Iyengar, Adam Simon and OliverWright. 1995. Crime in black and white: The violent, scaryworld of local news. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for American Politics and Public Policy, Occasional Paper No. 95-1, September.
57. Goering, John, and JudithD. Feins, eds. 2003. Choosing a better life: Evaluating the moving to opportunity experiment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
58. Goering, John, AliKamely and Todd Richardson. 1994. The location and racial occupancy of public housing in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
59. Goodgame, Dan. 1993. Welfare for the well off. Time, February 22.
60. Gravelle, Jane G. 1996. Effects of flat taxes and other proposals on housing: An overview (Report 96-552). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, June 17.
61. Green, Richard, and Kerry Vandell. 1996. Giving households credit: How changes in the tax code could promote homeownership. Madison, WI: Center for Urban Land Economics Research, August 6.
62. Green, Richard, and Andrew Reschovsky. 1997. The design of a mortgage interest tax credit: Final report submitted to theNationalHousing Institute.Orange, NJ: National Housing Institute, eds. 2001. Using tax policy to increase homeownership among low and moderate income households: Final report submitted to the Ford Foundation. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty, November.
63. Gugliotta, Guy. 1995. Saving HUD. Washington Post, February 6, A4.
64. Gugliotta, Guy. 1996. Dole urges abolition of public housing. Washington Post, April 30, A5.
65. Gyourko, Joseph, and Richard Voith. 1997. Does the U.S. tax treatment of housing promote suburbanization and central city decline? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Real Estate and Finance Departments, September.
66. Gyourko, Joseph, and Todd Sinai. 2001. The spatial distribution of housing-related tax benefits in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, July.
67. Hage, David, David Fischer, and Robert Black. 1995. America's other welfare state. U.S. News & World Report, April 10.
68. Haggerty, Maryann. 1996. A battle over mortgage interest deduction; realty agents, builders and lenders rise to defense of tax break for homeowners. Washington Post, February 17, p. E1.
69. Harkness, Joseph M., Sandra J. New man and Barbara J. Lipman. 2002. Housing America's working families: A further exploration. Washington, DC: Center for Housing Policy, March.
70. Harney, Kenneth. Housing subsidies poor excuse for grumbling:Home owners aided most by programs. Boston Herald, February 16, 1990.
71. Harney, Kenneth. Taxes favor higher income groups. Boston Herald, May 15, 1992.
72. Hartman, Chester. 1992. Debating the low-income housing tax credit: Feeding the sparrows by feeding the horses. Shelterforce, January/February.
73. Hays, R. Allen. 1995. The federal government and urban housing, 2nd edition. Albany: SUNY Press.
74. Heskin, AllanDavid. 1981.The historyof tenants inthe United States: Struggle and ideology. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 5, 178-203. "Housing subsidies for the well-off." 1992. Boston Globe, April 27 [editorial].
75. Howard, Christopher. 1997. The hidden welfare state: Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76. Howlett, Debbie. 1993. Reagan-era scandal revisits courtroom today. USA Today, September 7, 3A.
77. Hughes, Mark Alan. 1997. The administrative geography of devolving social welfare programs. Joint Occasional Paper 97-1. Washington, DC: Center for Public Management and Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution. www.brook.edu/ES/Urban/admgeo.htm.
78. Inman, Bradley. 1994. Report claims tax breaks uneven. Los Angeles Times, May 22.
79. Irvine, Jim. 1995. Save the interest deduction. The Builder, July, 48.
80. Is the Mortgage Interest Deduction Sacred? 1989. Forbes, March 20.
81. Isaac, William M., and James A. Marigon (The Secura Group). 1996. The flat tax: implications for homeowners.Washington, DC: Mortgage Bankers Association of America, April 9.
82. Jackson, Kenneth. 1985. Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
83. Jacobson, Louis. 1995. Hitting taxpayers where they live? National Journal, April 15.
84. Jargowsky, Paul. 1997. Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
85. Jefferson, Thomas. 1956. A Jefferson profile as revealed in his letters (selected and arrangedbySaul Padova). New York: John Day Co., 37.
86. Jencks, Christopher. 1997.The hidden paradox of welfare reform: Why single mothers may earn more but do worse. American Prospect, May/June.
87. Johnson, Andrew. 1850. The homestead. Congressional Globe (Appendix, July 25), 31st Cong., lst Sess., Vol. 22, Part 2, 950-952.
88. Johnston, David Cay. 1996.How a flat tax would work, for you and for them, New York Times, January 21. 1999. Mortgage tax break: who gets what? New York Times, January 10.
89. Joint Center forHousing Studies. 1995. The state of the nation's housing: 1995. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
90. Joint Center forHousing Studies. 2001. The state of the nation's housing: 2001. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
91. Keith, Nathaniel. 1973. Politics and the housing crisis since 1930. New York: Universe.
92. Keyes, Langley. 1992. Strategiesandsaints.Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
93. Kingsley, G. Thomas. 1997. Federal housing assistance and welfare reform: Uncharted territory. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
94. Klott, Gary. 1992. Clinton could tighten mortgage writeoff limit. Boston Globe, December 3.
95. Koretz, Gene. 1998. The rewards of homeownership. Business Week, June 15.
96. Lehman, H. Jane. 1991. Low-income housing group asks tax shift. Washington Post, May 25.
97. Lehman, H. Jane. 1994. House makes progress in realty issues: Debate still ahead on mortgage loan deduction. Washington Post, April 15.
98. Lipman, Barbara J. 2001. Paycheck to paycheck: Working families and the cost of housing in America. Washington, DC: Center for Housing Policy, June.
99. Liston, Robert. 1974. The ugly palaces. New York: FranklinWatts, Inc.
100. Lubove, Roy. 1962. The progressives and the slums: Tenement house reform in New York City, 1890-1917. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
101. McGough, Duane T. 1997. Characteristics of HUD-assisted renters and their units in 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment, Office of PolicyDevelopment and Research, May.
102. McLure Jr., Charles E. 1986. Tax treatment of owneroccupied housing: The Achilles' heel of tax reform? In Tax Reformand Real Estate, ed. James R. Follain. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
103. Manvel, Allen D. 1991. Upside-down housing "Aid"? Tax Notes, Vol. 53, No. 6, November 11.
104. Marcuse, Peter. 1975. Residential alienation: Home ownership and the limits of shelter policy. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, Vol. 3, 182-203.
105. Marcuse, Peter. 1980. Ideology of ownership and property rights. In Housing Form and Public Policy in the United States, ed. Richard Plunz, 39-50. New York: Praeger.
106. Mariano, Ann. 1988. Is it a mortgage deduction, or a housing subsidy for the wealthy? Washington Post National Weekly Edition, October 24-30.
107. Mariano, Ann. 1994.Hill panel halts plan to move poor families. Washington Post, September 3.
108. Mariano, Ann. 1995. Lawmakers take aim at tax deduction for mortgage loans; some lawmakers target tax deduction for mortgage loans. Washington Post, March 4.
109. Markusen, Ann, Peter Hall, Scott Campbell and Sabina Deitrick. 1991. The rise of the gunbelt: The military remapping of industrial America. New York: Oxford University Press.
110. Massey, Douglas S., and Nancy M. Denton. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass.Cambridge, MA:HarvardUniversity Press.
111. Millennial Housing Commission. 2002. Meeting our nation's housing challenges: Report of the bipartisan millennial housing commission appointed by the Congress of theUnited States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, May 30.
112. Mitchell, J. Paul, ed. 1985. Federal housing policy & programs. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research.
113. Mollenkopf, John. 1983. The contested city. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press "Mortgage interest deduction may be target." 1994. Housing Affairs Letter, February 25.
114. Nardulli, Peter, Jon Dalager and Donald Greco. 1996. Voter turnout inU.S. presidential elections: An historical view and some speculation. Political Science 29(3):480-490.
115. National Association of Home Builders. 1989. "Elimination of the mortgage deduction would raise homeownership costs, studies show," March 22 [press release].
116. Nelson, Lars-Erik. 2000. Bush's words tax his credibility. New York Daily News, October 25.
117. Newman, Sandra. 1999. The home front: Implications of welfare reform for housing policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
118. Newman, Sandra, and Ann Schnare. 1994. Back to the future:Housing assistance policy for the next century. Paper prepared for the Center for Housing Policy, Washington, DC.
119. Newman, Sandra, and Ann Schnare. 1997. ". And a suitable living environment": The failure of housing programs to deliver on neighborhood quality. Housing Policy Debate 8(4):703, B41.
120. Oberlander, H. Peter, and Eva Newbrun. 1999.Houser: The life and work of Catherine Bauer. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
121. Paget, Karen. 1998.Cancities escapepolitical isolation? American Prospect, January/February, 54-62.
122. Passell, Peter. 1993. Economic scene: To raise federal revenue, reduce those sacred tax preferences. New York Times, February 11.
123. Pedone, Carla. 1991. Estimating mortgage prepayments and defaults in older federally assisted rental housing and possible costs of preventing them. Housing Policy Debate, Vol. 2, No. 2.
124. Peirce, Neal. 1994. Opening the door to homeownership. National Journal, March 12.
125. Poterba, James. 1992. Taxation and housing:Old questions, new answers. AEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 82, No. 2, May.
126. Radford, Gail. 1996.Modernhousing forAmerica:Policy struggles in the New Deal era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
127. Raspberry, William. 1995. At HUD, reinvention by necessity. Washington Post, January 4.
128. Rockwell, Jr., Llewellyn. 1994. The ghost of Gautreaux. National Review, March 7.
129. Rosin, Hanna. 1997. Shades of gray. New Republic, April 14, 21-23.
130. Rubinowitz, Leonard, and James Rosenbaum. 2000. Crossing the class and color lines: Frompublic housing to white suburbia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
131. Salmon, Jacqueline. 1992. Mortgage tax break: Time to pare it down? Washington Post, May 17.
132. Samuelson, Robert. 1993. Gutting tax reform. Washington Post NationalWeekly Edition, February 22-28.
133. Sauerzopf, Richard, and Todd Swanstrom. 1999. The urban electorate in presidential elections, 1920-1992. Urban Affairs Review, 35(1):72-91.
134. Schill, Michael H., and Susan M. Wachter. 1995a. Housing market constraints and spatial stratification by income and race. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1):141-167.
135. Schill, Michael H., and Susan M. Wachter. 1995b. The spatial bias of federal housing law and policy: Concentrated poverty in urban America. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143(5):1285-1349.
136. Scruggs, Yvonne. 1995. HUD's stewardship of national urban policy:Aretrospective view.Cityscape, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 33-68.
137. Seiders, David. 1995. Budget ax falls. The Builder, February, 38.
138. Seldon, Barry J., and Roy G. Boyd. 1996. The economic effects of a flat tax.Dallas: National Center forPolicy Analysis, May.
139. Shear, Jeff. 1995. From the K Street corridor. National Journal, October 28.
140. Sichelman, Lew. 1996. Flat tax could cause value dip. National Mortgage News, April 22. Stanfield, Rochelle. 1994. Big money in low rents. National Journal, May 7.
141. Sichelman, Lew. 1997. Give HUD a hand. National Journal, February 22.
142. Starobin, Paul. 1994. There's no deduction like home. National Journal, February 5.
143. Stegman, Michael. 1990. The excessive costs of creative finance:Growing inefficiencies in the production of low-incomehousing. Housing PolicyDebate, 2(2):357-373.
144. Stegman, Michael. 2000. Housing America's working families. Washington, DC: The Center for Housing Policy, June.
145. Sternlieb, George, and James Hughes. 1991. Private market provision of low-income housing: Historical perspective and future prospects. Housing Policy Debate, 2(2):123-156.
146. Stone, Michael. 1993. Shelter poverty. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
147. Surrey, Stanley. 1973. Pathways to tax reform: The concept of tax expenditures, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
148. Surrey, Stanley, and Paul McDaniel, 1985. Tax expenditures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
149. The impact of potential policy changes affecting the mortgage interest deduction on the housing and financial sectors. 1995. Washington, DC: America's Community Bankers, American Banking Association, Mortgage Bankers Association, National Association of Home Builders, National Association of Realtors, March.
150. The Economy: Painand candor. 1993. New York Times, February 14 [editorial].
151. The rural housing program in fiscal year 1997. Washington, DC: Housing Assistance Council.
152. The rural housing program in fiscal year 1998. Washington, DC: Housing Assistance Council.
153. Turner, Margery Austin. 1998.Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenantbased housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 9(2):373-394.
154. Twentieth Century Fund. 1991. More housing, more fairly: Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on affordable housing. New York: The Fund.
155. Twenty Ways to Deflate a Deficit. 1993. Los Angeles Times, February 14 [editorial].
156. U.S. Department of Defense. 1998. Department of Defense budget estimates for FY 1997 (TheGreen Book). Washington, DC.
157. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 1996. Rental housing assistance at a crossroads: A report to Congress on worst case housing needs. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, March.
158. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 1998. Rental housing assistance-The crisis continues. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research.
159. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2001. A report on worst case housing needs in 1999: New opportunity amid continuing challenges. Washington, DC:OfficeofPolicyDevelopmentand Research.
160. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1995. Rural housing programs. Washington, DC.
161. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1996. Military family housing. Washington, DC.
162. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1997. Tax credits: Opportunities to improve oversight of the low-income housing program.Washington, DC, March 28.
163. U.S. General Accounting Office. 2001. Military personnel: Higher allowances should increase use of civilian housing, but not retention. Washington, DC, May.
164. Upside Down Housing Policy. 1994. Washington Post, January 10 [editorial].
165. Vale, Lawrence J. 1993. Beyond the problem projects paradigm: Defining and revitalizing "severely distressed" public housing. Housing Policy Debate, 4(2):147-174.
166. von Hoffman, Alexander. 1996. Vision limited: The political movement for a U.S. Public Housing Program, 1919-1950. Working Paper Series. Harvard University, Joint Center for Housing Studies.
167. Wallace, James. 1994. The dilemma of disposition of troubledPHA-insuredmultifamily rental property. Housing Policy Debate, 1(5):1-34.
168. Warner, Sam Bass. 1962. Streetcar suburbs. New York: Athenaeum Press.
169. Warner, Sam Bass. 1972. The urban wilderness: A history of the American city. New York: Harper and Row. Wolman, Harold, and Lisa Marckini. 1998. Changes in central city representation and influence in Congress since the 1960s. Urban Affairs Review, 34(2):291-312.
170. Wright, Gwendolyn. 1981. Building the dream: A social history of housing inAmerica, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.