Introduction

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 194-196

  Baker, Eva ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013317979     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1996.9941204     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Baker, E.L., O'Neil, H. F. & Linn, R. L. (1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment American Psychologist, 48(12). 1210-1218
2. California Department of Education (1993). Statew ide performance standards for the California Learning Assessment System. Sacramento. CA: Author
3. Cannell, J. J. (1987). Nationally normed elementary achievement testing in America s public schools: How all fifty states are above the national average. Daniels. WV: Friends for Education
4. Edelman, M. W. (1994, February). Keynote address at The California Education Summit, San Francisco
5. Linn, R. L., Baker, E.L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21
6. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R, L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan
7. National Council on Education Standards and Testing (1992). Raising standards for American education. Washington. DC: Author
8. Resnick, L. B. & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B, R. Gifford & M, C. O'Connor (Eds.), Future assessments: Changing views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction. Boston: Kluwer Academic
9. Wildavsky, A. (1993). Speaking truth to power. The art and craft of policy analysis. New Brunswick. NJ: Transaction