Rupture imaging for the 2016 august 24, Mw=6.0 central Italy earthquake, from back­projection of strong­motion array data

Annals of Geophysics

Volumn 59, Issue FASTTRACK5, 2016, Pages

  Saccorotti, Gilberto ^a   Piccinini, Davide ^a   Giunchi, Carlo ^a  

^a SEZIONE DI PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSEISMIC PROCESS; DATA INVERSION; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FAULT PLANE; STRONG MOTION;

ITALY;

EID: 85013301493     PISSN: 15935213     EISSN: 2037416X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4401/AG-7294     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Abrahamson, N.A., and B.A. Bolt, (1987). Array Analysis and Synthesis Mapping of Strong Seismic Motion. In Seismic Strong Motion Synthetics, Bruce A. Bolt (Editor). Academic Press, Orlando, Florida. 55­90.
2. Capon, J., (1969). High­resolution frequency­wavenumber spectrum analysis, Proc. IEEE, 57(8), 1408–1418.
3. Carannante, S., G. Monachesi, M. Cattaneo, A. Amato, and C. Chiarabba, (2013). Deep structure and tectonics of the northern­central Apennines as seen by regional­scale tomography and 3­D located earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res, 118, 5391–5403, doi:10.1002/jgrb.50371.
4. Gal, M., A. M. Reading, S. P. Ellingsen, K. D. Koper, S. J. Gibbons and S.P. Näsholm, (2014). Improved implementation of the fk and Capon methods for array analysis of seismic noise. Geophys. J. Int. 198, 1045–1054, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu183
5. Goldstein, P., and R.J. Archuleta (1987). Array analysis of seismic signals. Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 13­16.
6. Goldstein, P., and R. J. Archuleta (1991a), Deterministic frequency­wavenumber methods and direct measurements of rupture propagation during earthquakes using a dense array: Theory and methods, J. Geophys. Res., 96(B4), 6173–6185, doi:10.1029/90JB02123.
7. Goldstein, P., and R. J. Archuleta (1991b), Deterministic fre­ quency­wavenumber methods and direct measurements of rupture propagation during earthquakes using a dense array: Data Analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 96(B4), 6187–6198.
8. Gruppo di Lavoro INGV (2016). Secondo rapporto di sintesi sul Terremoto di Amatrice Ml 6.0 del 24 Agosto 2016 (Italia Centrale). doi: 10.5281/zenodo.154400
9. Gruppo di Lavoro IREA­CNR & INGV, (2016). Sequenza sismica di Amatrice: aggiornamento delle analisi interferometriche satellitari e modelli di sorgente, doi: 292 10.5281/zenodo.61682.
10. Kiser, E., and M. Ishii, (2012). Combining seismic arrays to image the high­frequency characteristics of large earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int. 188, 1117–1128. doi: 10.1111/j.1365­246X.2011.05299.x
11. Meng, L., J.­P. Ampuero, A. Sladen, and H. Rendon (2012), High­resolution backprojection at regional distance: Application to the Haiti M7.0 earthquake and comparisons with finite source studies, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B04313, doi:10.1029/2011JB008702.
12. Rost, S. and Thomas, C. (2002). Array seismology: methods and applications. Rev. Geophys., 40, doi:10.1029/ 2000RG000100.
13. Tinti, E., L. Scognamiglio, A. Michelini and M. Cocco (2016). Slip heterogeneity and directivity of the M L 6.0, 2016, Amatrice earthquake estimated with rapid fi-nite­fault inversion. Submitted to Geophys. Res. Lett.