An Algorithm for the Use of Embolic Protection During Atherectomy for Femoral Popliteal Lesions

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 403-410

  Krishnan, Prakash ^a   Tarricone, Arthur ^a   Purushothaman, K Raman ^a   Purushothaman, Meerarani ^a   Vasquez, Miguel ^a   Kovacic, Jason ^a   Baber, Usman ^a   Kapur, Vishal ^a   Gujja, Karthik ^a   Kini, Annapoorna ^a   Sharma, Samin ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

atherectomy; embolic protection; peripheral artery disease

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ATHERECTOMY; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; CALCIFIED LESION; CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION; DIRECTIONAL ATHERECTOMY; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE; FEMALE; FEMOROPOPLITEAL LESION; HUMAN; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; LASER ATHERECTOMY; LESIONS AND DEFECTS; LIPOPROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; LOWER EXTREMITY PERIPHERAL ARTERY DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATIONAL ATHERECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SILVERHAWK; THROMBUS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ALGORITHM; ANGIOGRAPHY; BIOPSY; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EMBOLISM; FEMORAL ARTERY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; THROMBOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR CALCIFICATION; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ANGIOGRAPHY; ATHERECTOMY; BIOPSY; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES; EMBOLISM; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; PLAQUE, ATHEROSCLEROTIC; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECURRENCE; RISK FACTORS; THROMBOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR CALCIFICATION;

EID: 85013249471     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: 18767605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 1 McKinsey, J.F., Zeller, T., Rocha-Singh, K.J., Jaff, M.R., Garcia, L.A., DEFINITIVE LE Investigators. Lower extremity revascularization using directional atherectomy: 12-month prospective results of the DEFINITIVE LE study. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 7 (2014), 923–933.
2. 2 Franzone, A., Ferrone, M., Carotenuto, G., et al. The role of atherectomy in the treatment of lower extremity peripheral artery disease. BMC Surg, 12(Suppl 1), 2012, S13.
3. 3 Lam, R.C., Shah, S., Faries, P.L., McKinsey, J.F., Kent, K.C., Morrissey, N.J., Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during percutaneous interventions involving the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg 46 (2007), 1155–1159.
4. 4 Davies, M.G., Bismuth, J., Saad, W.E., et al. Implications of in situ thrombosis and distal embolization during superficial femoral artery endoluminal intervention. Ann Vasc Surg 24 (2010), 14–22.
5. 5 Shammas, N.W., Shammas, G.A., Dippel, E.J., Jerin, M., Shammas, W.J., Predictors of distal embolization in peripheral percutaneous interventions: a report from a large peripheral vascular registry. J Invasive Cardiol 21 (2009), 628–631.
6. 6 Arthurs, Z.M., Bishop, P.D., Feiten, L.E., Eagleton, M.J., Clair, D.G., Kashyap, V.S., Evaluation of peripheral atherosclerosis: a comparative analysis of angiography and intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Vasc Surg 51 (2010), 933–938 discussion 939.
7. 7 Expert Panel on Detection E, Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in A. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 285 (2001), 2486–2497.
8. 8 Roberts, D., Niazi, K., Miller, W., et al. Effective endovascular treatment of calcified femoropopliteal disease with directional atherectomy and distal embolic protection: final results of the DEFINITIVE Ca(+)(+) trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 84 (2014), 236–244.
9. 9 Wholey, M., The role of embolic protection in peripheral arterial atherectomy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 14 (2011), 65–74.
10. 10 Muller-Hulsbeck, S., Schafer, P.J., Humme, T.H., et al. Embolic protection devices for peripheral application: wasteful or useful?. J Endovasc Ther 16:Suppl 1 (2009), I163–I169.
11. 11 Casserly, I.P., Abou-Chebl, A., Fathi, R.B., et al. Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005), 1466–1472.
12. 12 Ge, J., Chirillo, F., Schwedtmann, J., et al. Screening of ruptured plaques in patients with coronary artery disease by intravascular ultrasound. Heart 81 (1999), 621–627.
13. 13 Sata, M., Fukuda, D., Tanaka, K., Kaneda, Y., Yashiro, H., Shirakawa, I., The role of circulating precursors in vascular repair and lesion formation. J Cell Mol Med 9 (2005), 557–568.
14. 14 Napodano, M., Ramondo, A., Tarantini, G., et al. Predictors and time-related impact of distal embolization during primary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 30 (2009), 305–313.
15. 15 Jordan, W.D. Jr., Voellinger, D.C., Doblar, D.D., Plyushcheva, N.P., Fisher, W.S., McDowell, H.A., Microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler monitoring in patients during carotid angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy. Cardiovasc Surg 7 (1999), 33–38.
16. 16 Gray, W.A., Hopkins, L.N., Yadav, S., et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 44 (2006), 258–268.