RE: Which estimates comprise optimal reporting in systematic reviews?

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 81, Issue , 2017, Pages 140-141

  Alonso Coello, P ^a,b   Vernooij, R W M ^a   Carrasco Labra, A ^b,c   Vandvik, P ^d   Guyatt, G H ^b  

^a CIBER EPIDEMIOLOGÍA Y SALUD PÚBLICA CIBERESP   (Spain)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^d NORWEGIAN KNOWLEDGE CENTRE FOR THE HEALTH SERVICES   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PUBLISHING;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 85013215020     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.001     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. [1] Alonso-Coello, P., Carrasco-Labra, A., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Neumann, I., Akl, E.A., Vernooij, R.W., et al. Systematic reviews experience major limitations in reporting absolute effects. J Clin Epidemiol 72 (2016), 16–26.
2. [2] Carrasco-Labra, A., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Santesso, N., Neumann, I., Mustafa, R.A., Mbuagbaw, L., et al. Improving GRADE evidence tables part I: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format. J Clin Epidemiol 74 (2016), 7–18.
3. [3] Vandvik, P.O., Santesso, N., Akl, E.A., You, J., Mulla, S., Spencer, F.A., et al. Formatting modifications in GRADE evidence profiles improved a guideline panelists comprehension and accesibility to information. A randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol 65 (2012), 748–755.
4. [4] iSoF: The key information you need to understand the benefits and harms of treatments. Available at http://isof.epistemonikos.org/ - /. Accessed April 25, 2016.