The changing face of public adoption practice

Adoption Quarterly

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 43-61

  Simmons, Brian ^a   Allphin, Sally ^b   Barth, Richard P ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adoption; Juvenile court; Permanency planning; Qualitative research; Workload study

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013114293     PISSN: 10926755     EISSN: 1544452X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J145v03n04_04     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Allphin, S., Simmons, B., & Barth, R.P. (1997). The adoption workload study: Final report. Berkeley: The Child Welfare Research Center.
2. American Bar Association (n.d.). Court improvement fact sheet. http://www.abanet. org/child/factsheet.html
3. Berrick, J.D., Needell, B., Barth, R.P., & Jonson-Reid, M. (1998). The tender years: Toward developmentally sensitive child welfare services. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Klain, E.J. (1998). Implementation ofjuvenile dependency court reforms: Improving the system for abused and neglected children. Protecting Children, 14(1), 4-6.
5. Lee, R.E. & Hull, R.K. (1983). Legal, casework, and ethical issues in "risk adoption." Child Welfare, 62, 450-454.
6. Maluccio, A.N. & Fein, E. (1983). Permanency planning: A redefinition. Child Welfare, 62, 195-201.
7. National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. (1995). Resource guidelines: Improving court practice in child abuse and neglect cases. Reno, NV: author.
8. West's California juvenile laws and court rules (1997). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
9. W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (1994). Families for kids who wait: Promising directions in community-based adoption reform. Battle Creek, MI: author.