The Precautionary Principle and the Tolerability of Blood Transfusion Risks

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 32-43

  Kramer, Koen ^a,b   Zaaijer, Hans L ^a   Verweij, Marcel F ^b  

^a CENTRAL LABORATORY   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

donor blood safety; MSM and blood donation; opportunity costs; precautionary principle; risk; risk based decision making; transfusion transmissible infections

Indexed keywords

BLOOD SAFETY; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BLOOD TRANSFUSION REACTION; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HUMAN; PATIENT SAFETY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS;

BLOOD SAFETY; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PATIENT SAFETY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSFUSION REACTION;

EID: 85013029094     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1276643     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Ahteensuu, M., 2007. Rationale for taking precautions:Normative choices and commitments in the implementation of the precautionary principle. Risk & Rationalities (Conference Proceedings), Queens' College, Cambridge, UK. Available at:http://www.kent.ac.uk/scarr/events/ahteensuu.pdf (accessed December18, 2014).
2. Ahteensuu, M., and P., Sandin. 2012. The precautionary principle. In Handbook of risk theory, ed. S., Roeser, R., Hillerbrand, P., Sandin, et al., 961–78. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Springer. Available at:http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_38
3. Alliance of Blood Operators. 2015. Risk-based decision-making framework for blood safety. Available at:https://allianceofbloodoperators.org/media/115522/rbdm-framework-2-april-2015-v11-for-website.pdf
4. Alter, H. J., 2008. Pathogen reduction:A precautionary principle paradigm. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 22 (2):97–102.
5. Alter, H. J., R. H., Purcell, P. V., Holland, et al. 1981. Donor transaminase and recipient hepatitis:Impact on blood transfusion services. Journal of the American Medical Association 246 (6):630–34.
6. AuBuchon, J. P., and L. D., Petz. 2001. Making decisions to improve transfusion safety. In Policy alternatives in transfusion medicine, ed. J. P., AuBuchon, L. D., Petz, and A., Fink, 193–226. Bethesda, MD:American Association of Blood Banks.
7. Blood Products Advisory Committee. 2009. Transcript of 94th meeting. Available at:http://www.fda.gov/advisorycommittees/committeesmeetingmaterials/bloodvaccinesandotherbiologics/bloodproductsadvisorycommittee/default.htm (accessed March29, 2016).
8. Borkent-Raven, B. A., M. P., Janssen, C. L., van der Poel, et al. 2012. Cost-effectiveness of additional blood screening tests in the Netherlands. Transfusion 52:478–88.
9. Commission of the European Communities. 2000. Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle. Available at:http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52000DC0001 (accessed March29, 2016).
10. Cranor, C. F., 2004. Toward understanding aspects of the precautionary principle. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29:259–79.
11. Custer, B., and J. S., Hoch. 2009. Cost-effectiveness analysis:What it really means for transfusion medicine decision making. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 23 (1):1–12.
12. Custer, B., and M. P., Janssen. 2015. Health economics and outcomes methods in risk-based decision-making for blood safety. Transfusion 55:2039–47.
13. Dodd, R. Y., 2010. Prions and precautions:Be careful for what you ask. Transfusion 50:956–8.
14. Epstein, J. S., H. W., Jaffe, H. J., Alter, et al. 2013. Blood system changes since recognition of transfusion-associated AIDS:Blood system changes since AIDS. Transfusion 53:2365–74.
15. European Environment Agency. 2001. Late lessons from early warnings:The precautionary principle, 1896–2000, ed. P., Harremoës et al. Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
16. European Environment Agency. 2013. Late lessons from early warnings:Science, precaution, innovation, ed. D., Gee, et al. Luxembourg:Publications Office of the European Union.
17. Farrell A-M., 2012. The politics of blood:Ethics, innovation and the regulation of risk [eBook]. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
18. Farrugia, A., 2002. The regulatory pendulum in transfusion medicine. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 16 (4):273–82.
19. Federal Drug Administration. 2015. Revised recommendations for reducing the risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission by blood and blood products. Available at:http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Blood/UCM446580.pdf (accessed March29, 2016).
20. Feinberg, J., 1984. The moral limits of the criminal law volume I:Harm to others. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
21. Feldman, E. A., and R., Bayer (eds.). 1999. Blood feuds:AIDS, blood, and the politics of medical disaster. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
22. Forland F., H., De Carvalho Gomes, H., Nokleby, et al. 2012. Applicability of evidence-based practice in public health:Risk assessment on Q fever under an ongoing outbreak. Euro Surveillance 17 (3):1–6.
23. Galarneau C., 2010. Blood donation, deferral, and discrimination:FDA donor deferral policy for men who have sex with men. American Journal of Bioethics 10:29–39.
24. Goklany, I. M., 2001. The precautionary principle:A critical appraisal of environmental risk assessment. Washington, DC:Cato Institute.
25. Hansen, S. F., and J. A., Tickner. 2013. The precautionary principle and false alarms—Lessons learned. In Late lessons from early warnings:Science, precaution, innovation, ed. D., Gee, P., Grandjean, S. F., Hansen, et al., 17–45. Copenhagen, Denmark:European Environment Agency.
26. Hansen S. F., M. K., von Krauss, and J. A., Tickner. 2008. The precautionary principle and risk–risk tradeoffs. Journal of Risk Research 11 (4):423–64.
27. Hansson, S. O., 1999. Adjusting scientific practices to the precautionary principle. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 5 (5):909–21.
28. Hartzell-Nichols, L., 2013. From “the” precautionary principle to precautionary principles. Ethics, Policy & Environment 16 (3):308–20.
29. Hayenhjelm, M., and J., Wolff. 2012. The moral problem of risk impositions:A survey of the literature. European Journal of Philosophy 20:E26–51.
30. Hergon, E., G., Moutel, N., Duchange, et al. 2005. Risk management in transfusion after the HIV blood contamination crisis in France:The impact of the precautionary principle. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 19 (4):273–80.
31. Holm, S., and J., Harris. 1999. Precautionary principle stifles discovery. Nature 400:396.
32. Holtug, N., 2002. The harm principle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357–89.
33. Hourdequin, M., 2007. Doing, allowing, and precaution. Environmental Ethics 29 (4):339–58.
34. Institute of Medicine. 1995. HIV and the blood supply:An analysis of crisis decisionmaking. Washington, DC:Institute of Medicine National Academy Press.
35. Jensen, K. K., 2002. The moral foundation of the precautionary principle. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15:39–55.
36. John, S. D., 2011. Risk and precaution. In Public health ethics, ed. A., Dawson, 67–84. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
37. Krever, H., 1997. Final report:Commission of inquiry on the blood system in Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada:Canadian Government Publishing.
38. Leiss W., M., Tyshenko, and D., Krewski. 2008. Men having sex with men donor deferral risk assessment:An analysis using risk management principles. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 22:35–57.
39. Manson, N. A., 2002. Formulating the precautionary principle. Environmental Ethics 24 (3):263–74.
40. Menitove, J. E., J. L., Bennett, P., Tomasulo, et al. 2014. How safe is safe enough, who decides and how? From a zero-risk paradigm to risk-based decision making. Transfusion 54 (3pt2):753–57.
41. Munthe, C., 2011. The price of precaution and the ethics of risk (eBook). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Springer.
42. Moreno, J. D., 2003. “Creeping precautionism” and the blood supply. Transfusion 43:840–42.
43. Nollkaemper, A., 1996. ‘What you risk reveals what you value,’ and other dilemmas encountered in the legal assaults on risks. In The precautionary principle and international law, ed. D., Freestone and E., Hey, 73–94. The Hague, The Netherlands:Kluwer Law International.
44. Pereira, A., 2008. Risk management. In Transfusion microbiology, ed. J. A. J., Barbara, F. A. M., Regan, and M. C., Contreras, 341–61. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
45. Resnik, D. B., 2003. Is the precautionary principle unscientific? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):329–44.
46. Sandin, P., 1999. Dimensions of the precautionary principle. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment:An International Journal 5 (5):889–907.
47. Sandin, P., 2004. The precautionary principle and the concept of precaution. Environmental Values 13 (4):461–75.
48. Sandin, P., M., Peterson, S. O., Hansson, et al. 2002. Five charges against the precautionary principle. Journal of Risk Research 5 (4):287–99.
49. Saner, M. A., 2002. An ethical analysis of the precautionary principle. International Journal of Biotechnology 4 (1):81–95.
50. Schippers, E. I., 2014. Ministerieel plan bloedvoorziening 2015–2017. Available at:http://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/detail?id=2014D32795 (accessed March29, 2016).
51. Science and Environmental Health Network. 1998. Wingspread statement on the precautionary principle. Available at:http://www.sehn.org/wing.html (accessed March29, 2016).
52. Steel, D., 2015. Philosophy and the precautionary principle:Science, evidence, and environmental policy. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
53. Stoto, M. A., 2006. The precautionary principle and emerging biologic risks:Lessons from human immunodeficiency virus in blood products. Seminars in Hematology 43:S10–2.
54. Sunstein, C. R., 2005. Laws of fear:Beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
55. Tickner, J. A., 2002. The precautionary principle and public health trade-offs:Case study of West Nile virus. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 584:69–79.
56. Trouwborst, A., 2006. Precautionary right and duties of states. Boston, MA:Martinus Nijhof.
57. Turner, M. L., 2006. Transfusion safety with regards to prions:Ethical, legal and societal considerations. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique 13 (5):317–19.
58. United Nations Environment Programme. 1992. Rio declaration on environment and development. Available at:http://www.unep.org/documents.multilingual/default.asp?documentid=78&articleid=1163 (accessed March29, 2016).
59. Vamvakas, E. C., S., Kleinman, H., Hume, et al. 2006. The development of West Nile virus safety policies by Canadian Blood Services:Guiding principles and a comparison between Canada and the United States. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 20 (2):97–109.
60. Vamvakas, E. C., 2011a. Relative risk of reducing the lifetime blood donation deferral for men who have had sex with men versus currently tolerated transfusion risks. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 25:47–60.
61. Vamvakas, E. C., 2011b. Decision making in transfusion medicine. Bethesda, MD:American Association of Blood Banks.
62. Verweij, M. F., and K., Kramer, 2016. Donor blood screening and moral responsibility:How safe should blood be? Journal of Medical Ethics. Published Online First:February 11, 2016. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103338
63. Von Schomberg, R., 2012. The precautionary principle:Its use within hard and soft law. European Journal of Risk Regulation 2:147–56.
64. Wilson, K., 2011. A framework for applying the precautionary principle to transfusion safety. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 25 (3):177–83.
65. Wilson, K., K., Atkinson, and J., Keelan. 2014. Three decades of MSM donor deferral policies:What have we learned? International Journal of Infectious Diseases 18:1–3.
66. Wilson, K., I., Graham, M., Ricketts, et al. 2007. Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease and the Canadian blood system after the tainted blood tragedy. Social Science & Medicine 64 (1):174–85.
67. Wilson, K., M., Wilson, P. C., Hébert, et al. 2003. The application of the precautionary principle to the blood system:The Canadian blood system's vCJD donor deferral policy. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 17 (2):89–94.