The journal of bone and joint surgery, the bone & joint journal, and clinical orthopaedics and related research require prospective registration of randomised clinical trials

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 98-B, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 1571-1572

  Leopold, S S ^a   Swiontkowski, M ^b   Haddad, F S ^c,d  

^a Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research   (United States)

^b Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery   (United States)

^c Edit in Chief the Bone and Joint Journal ^*  (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DATA REPOSITORY; EDITOR; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; JOINT SURGERY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGISTRATION; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; ORTHOPEDICS; PUBLISHING; REGISTER; STANDARDS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; ORTHOPEDICS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REGISTRIES;

EID: 85012843717     PISSN: 20494394     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.38081     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, et al. The 2011 Oxford CEBM levels of evidence: introductory document. http://www.cebm.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ CEBM-Levels-of-Evidence-Introduction-2.1.pdf (date last accessed 03 October 2016).
2. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomeDical research: a systematic review. JAMA 2003;289:454-465.
3. Emerson GB, Warme WJ, Wolf FM, et al. Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1934-1939.
4. Lièvre M, Ménard J, Bruckert E, et al. Premature Discontinuation of clinical trial for reasons not related to efficacy, safety, or feasibility. BMJ 2001;322:603-605.
5. Rosenthal R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 1979;86:638-641.
6. No authors listed. Cochrane Methods Bias. Reporting biases. http://methods. cochrane.org/bias/reporting-biases (date last accessed 03 October 2016).
7. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0: incluDing unpublished stuDies in systematic reviews. http://handbook. cochrane.org/chapter-10/ 10-3-2-incluDing-unpublished-stuDies-in-systematic-reviews.htm (date last accessed 03 October 2016).
8. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M, Egger M. Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:MR000010.
9. No authors listed. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov (date last accessed 03 October 2016).
10. No authors listed. World Health Organization. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP): primary registries. http://www.who.int/ictrp/network/primary/en/ (date last accessed 03 October 2016).
11. No authors listed. BioMed Central. ISRCTN registry. http://www.isrctn.com (date last accessed 03 October 2016).
12. Rifai N, Bossuyt PM, IoanniDis JP, et al. Registering Diagnostic and prognostic trials of tests: is it the right thing to do? Clin Chem 2014;60:1146-1152.
13. No authors listed. International Committee of MeDical Journal EDitors. Clinical trial registration. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-eDitorial-issues/clinical-trial-registration.html (date last accessed 03 October 2016).
14. De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of MeDical Journal EDitors. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1250-1251.