Pharmaceutical industry influences on physician prescribing: Gifts, quasi-gifts, and patient-directed gifts

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 56-57

  Berger, Jeffrey T ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012555858     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/15265160360706615     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bell, R. A., R. L. Kravitz, and M. S. Wilkes. 1999. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising and the public. Journal of General Internal Medicine 14:651–57.
2. Growth seen in ads for direct-to-consumer drugs. 1998. American Medical News, 27 April, p. 16.
3. IMS Health. 1999. Available from: www.imshealth.com/ims/portal/ front/articleC/0,2777,6599_41551570_41718516,00.html
4. Katz, D., J. Merz, and A. Caplan. 2003. All gifts large and small: Toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(3):39–46.
5. Morris, L. A., D. Brinberg, R. Klimberg, L. Millstein, and C. Rivera. 1986. Consumer attitudes about advertisements for medicinal drugs. Social Science and Medicine 22:629–38.
6. Schommer, J. C., W. R. Doucette, and B. H. Mehta. 1998. Rote learning after exposure to direct-to-consumer television advertisement for a prescription drug. Clinical Therapeutics 20:617–32