After said, after ayodhya: New challenges for the study of Indian religions

Religion

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 365-372

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012534627     PISSN: 0048721X     EISSN: 10961151     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/reli.1996.0030     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Edward Said, Orientalism, New York: Pantheon Books, 1979.
2. Ronald Inden, Imagining India, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.
3. Gyanendra Pandey, The Construction of Communalism in Colonial North India, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990.
4. Partha Chatterjee, Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.
5. Said, Orientalism, p. 272.
6. The phrase is derived from Romila Thapar’s ‘Syndicated Moksha?’, Seminar 313 (1985), 14–22.
7. See Ashis Nandy, ‘An anti-secularist manifesto’, Seminar 314 (Oct. 1985), 14–24
8. Ashis Nandy., ‘The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Religious Tolerance’, pp. 69–93
9. Veena Das (ed), Mirrors of Violence, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1990
10. Veena Das (ed)., ‘Hinduism versus Hindutva: The Inevitability of a Confrontation’, Times of India, 18 February, 1991
11. T. N. Madan, ‘Secularism in its Place’, Journal of Asian Studies 46, 4 (Nov. 1987), 747–58
12. T. N. Madan, ‘Whither Indian Secularism?’ Modern Asian Studies 27, (1993), 667–97.