The impact of the fuel price policy on the demand for diesel passenger cars in korean cities

International Review of Public Administration

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 61-73

  Kim, Jae Hong ^a   Lee, Seungil ^b   Preston, John ^c  

^a University of Ulsan   (South Korea)

^b University of Seoul   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Diesel passenger car; Fuel price policy; Price elasticity; Stated preference

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012534074     PISSN: 12294659     EISSN: 2331795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2006.10805069     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bates, J. 1988. Econometric Issues in SP Analysis. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22 (1): 59-69.
2. Bates, J. & Terzis, G. 2000. Stated Preference and the Ecological Fallacy. in Ortuzar, J. de D. (Ed.) Stated Preference Modelling Techniques PTRC.
3. Ben-Akiva, M. & S. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge. MA.: MIT Press.
4. Berkovec, J. 1985. Forecasting Automobile Demand Using Disaggregate Choice Models. Transportation Research B: Methodological 19 (4): 315-329.
5. Bose, R. K. 1996. Energy Demand and Environmental Implications in Urban Transport-Case of Delhi, Atmosphere Environment 30 (3): 403-412.
6. Bradley, M. & Gunn, H. 1993. The Strengths and Weakness of Travel Demand Model Systems for Assessing Emission Reduction Policies. The Science of The Total Environment 134 (1-3): 361-370.
7. Cirillo, C., di Torino, P., Daily, A. & Lindveld, K. 2000. Eliminating Bias Due to the Repeated Measurements Problem in SP Data, in Ortuzar, J. de D. (Ed.) Stated Preference Modeling Techniques. London: PTRC.
8. DeShanzo, J. R. & Fermo, G. 2002. Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 123-143.
9. Department of Environment. 2004. Environment White Paper. Department of Environment, Korea.
10. Earnhart, D. 2002. Combining Revealed and Stated Data to Examine Housing Decisions Using Discrete Choice Analysis. Journal of Urban Economics 51: 143-169.
11. Espey, M. 1996. Watching the Fuel Gauge: An International Model of Automobile Fuel Economy. Energy Economics 18: 93-106.
12. Graham, D. J. & Glaister, S. 2002. The Demand for Automobile Fuel: A Survey of Elasticity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36 (1): 1-25.
13. Greene, W. H. 2002. LIMDEP Version 7.0 User's Manual Revised Edition. New York and Sydney: Econometric Software, Inc.
14. Hensher, D. A. 1985. An Econometric Model of Vehicle Use in the Household Sector. Transportation Research B: Methodological 19 (4): 303-313.
15. Hensher, D. A. 1994. Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices: The State of Practise. Transportation 21: 107-133.
16. Jang, J. 2004. The Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Policy Change Analysis: The Case of Diesel Vehicle Policy in Korea. Korean Public Administration Review 39 (1): 175-196.
17. Jung, C.-M. 2002. A Study on the Part-Worth Estimation of Officetel Building Using the Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Korea Planners Association 37(3): 183-193.
18. Kang, H. C. 2003. Statistical Analysis Methods for the Cognitive Map Building. Media Research Newsletter No 8: 6-8.
19. Kim, J. H., Pagliara, F. & Preston, J. 2004. Transport Policy Impact on Residential Location. International Review of Public Administration 9(1): 71-87.
20. Kim, J. H., Pagliara, F. & Preston, J. 2005. The Intention to Move and Residential Location Choice Behavior. Urban Studies 42(9): 1621-1636.
21. Kocur, G., Alder, T., Hyman, W. & Audet, B. 1982. Guide to Forecasting Travel Demand with Direct Utility Assessment. US Department of Transportation. Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Report No UMTA-NH-11-0001-82-1. Washington, DC.
22. Korea Institute of Public Finance et al. 2004. Adjustment of Relative Energy Price according to the Sale Permission of Diesel Cars. Proceedings for the Public Hearing. the Conference Hall of the Korea Association of Tax Accountants, Seoul, 14, September 2004.
23. Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade. 2002. Proper Fuel Price Ratio. Seoul: KIET.
24. Lee, J., Ahn, J., Lee, J.-D. & Shin, H. 2004. Demand Analysis of the Home Ubiquitous Network Services Using Conjoint Method. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society 7(1): 89-110.
25. Leitham, S, McQuaid, R. W. & Nelson, J. D. 2000. The Influence of Transport on Industrial Location Choice: A Stated Preference Experiment. Transport Research A 34: 515-535.
26. Louviere, J. J, Hensher, D. A. & Swait, J. D. 2000. Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Mannering, F. L. & Train, K. 1985. Recent Directions in Automobile Demand Modeling. Transportation Research B: Methodological 19(4): 265-274.
28. Morikawa, T. 1989. Incorporating Stated Preference Data in Travel Demand Analysis. PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT.
29. Murphy, J.J. & Stevens, T.H. 2004. Contingent Valuation, Hypothetical Bias and Experimental Economics. Proceedings of NAREA-CAES Conference. Halifax, Nova Scotia.
30. Pagliara, F., Preston, J. & Kim, J. H. 2002. Modeling Residential Location Choice Behaviour. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference in 2004. Cambridge, UK.
31. Rouwendal, J. & de Vries, F. 1999. The Taxation of Drivers and the Choice of Car Fuel. Energy Economics 21: 17-35.
32. Schipper, L., Marie-Lilliu, C. & Fulton, L. 2002. Diesels in Europe: Analysis of Characteristics, Usage Patterns, Energy Savings and CO2 Emission Implications. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36(2): 305-340.
33. The Department of Environment. 2004. The Environmental White Paper. The Department of Environment. Seoul. Korea.
34. Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press.
35. Walker, B., Marsh, A., Wardman, M. & Niner, P. 2002. Modelling Tenants' Choices in the Public Rented Sector: A Stated Preference Approach. Urban Studies 39: 665-688.
36. Wardman, M. 1988. A Comparison of Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Travel Behavior. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22: 71-92.
37. Yoo, H. K. 2005. Keeping a Very Close Watch of the Car Makers on the Increase of the Diesel price. Munhwa-Ilbo. 2005. 1. 18.
38. Zhang, J., Timmermans, H., Borgers, A. and Wang, D. 2004. Modeling Traveler Choice Behavior Using the Concepts of Relative Utility and Relative Interest. Transportation Research Part B. 38(3): 215-234.