Functional Locus of the Annual Auditing of the Executive by the Korean National Assembly

International Review of Public Administration

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 79-95

  Chang Park, Jai ^a  

^a Sookmyung Women s University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012522040     PISSN: 12294659     EISSN: 23317795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12294659.1999.10804935     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ahn, Young S. 1998. Behaviors andReports ofthe New* Media on Ihe Annual Auditing by the National Assembly (in Korean). A paper delivered at a conference organized by the Korean Journalism Development Foundation at the Press Center in Seoul.
2. Antle, R. 1982. An Agency Model of Auditing.Journal of Accounting Research.20.
3. Baraclay, M 1976. Performance Auditing and the New Public Management: Changing Roles and Strategies of Central Audit Institutions.OECD. Performance Auditing anti the Modernisation of Government.
4. Bill Drafting and Budget Office, Secretariat of the National Assembly. 1998. Data Compilation on the Annual Auditing (in Korean) I &II.
5. Brown, Richard and Ray PethteL 1974. A Matter of Facts: State Legislate Performance Auditing.Public Admiiutfratioa Review.318-327.
6. Daivs, Dwight F. 1990. Do You Want a IVrformance Audit or a Program Evaluation?Public Administration Retiew.?0(1): 35-41.
7. Her, BumScKim Myung S 1998.Application of Theories and Methods of Policy Evaluation to Auditing Process(in Korean). Public Affairs Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University.
8. Kim, Myung S. 1990. Role of the National Board of Audit in the Process of Examination and Correction of the Administrative Misconduct* (in Korean)Korean Journal of Public Administration,24(1): 263-276
9. Kim, Myung S. ScPori Joon. 1995.Public Auditing(in Korean) Seoul Dacyoungmoonhwasa
10. Kim, Tac Y 1998. Managerial Directions &Principle* of Performance Auditing (m Korean). Korean Journal of Public Administration. 97-112.
11. Kim, Hyxm K. 1989.Effective IJnkage between the Annual Auditing of the SationaI Assembly and the Auditing hy the National Board of Audit(m Korean). Public Affairs Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University.
12. Basic Directions and Tasks of the 1996 Year Annual Auditing by the National Assembly (in Korean) A paper delivered at the seminar held to prepare 1996 year regular session of the national assembly. Members' Office Building. 1996.9. 13.
13. Korean National Assembly. 1998.Corrections and Treatment Items Requested as of the 1998 Year Annual Auditing by the National Assembly(in Korean).
14. Kwern, Oh D. 1997 Auditing System Reform to Upgrade Efficiency of the Audit: With Special Reference to Promoting National Competitiveness (in Korean).Journal of Audit,2: 3-24 Performance Auditing Course 1-36. Seoul: Audit Education Board
15. Lee, Kwang J. 1989.Administrative Reipontibility(in Korean). Seoul. Daeyoungmoonhwasa
16. Lee, Kyung S. 1994, Operation of Performance Auditing(in Kixtan).Audit Journal.(I): 45-53.
17. Lee, Kyung S &.Kwon Oh D. 1997.Approaches to Performance Auditing(in Korean) Job Education Material for Performance Auditing Course. Seoul: Audit Education Board. 1-36.
18. Lee, K« H. 1989. The Annual Auditing Power and the National Investigation Power: Issues and Suggestions (in Korean). Park. Dong S dc Kim Kw-ang W.legislature
19. Marvin, K. and Hedrick, J. 1974. GAO Helps Congress Evaluate Oversight.Public Administration Review,34(4) 327-333.
20. Newcomer, Kathryn E. 1994 Opportunities and Incentives for Improving Program Quality: Auditing and EvaluationPublic Administration Review,54(2): 147-154.
21. Proceedings Bureau. Secretarial of the National Assembly. 1996.Handbook on the Annual Auditing(in Korean).
22. Proceedings Bureau. Secretarial of the National Assembly 1999I998 Year Data Compilation Related to the Annual Auditing(in Korean).
23. Schick, Allen. 1976 Congress and the Details of AdministrationPublic Administration Review,25 526-551.
24. Schneider, Saundra. K. 1990. The Status of Program Evaluation Research.Public Administration Review.50(3): 393-395.
25. Tlrole, J. I986. Hierachies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations.Journal ofLaw, Economics, and Organizations.22. 181-213.
26. Walsh. Annmarie H. 1996. Performance Auditing and Legislative Oversight in the Context of Public Management Reform: the U.S. Experience.OECD. Performance Auditing and the Modernisation of Government.