Graphical Representation of Climate-Based Daylight Performance to Support Architectural Design

LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 39-61

  Bodart, Magali ^a   Kleindienst, Siân ^a   Andersen, Marilyne ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Annual Simulation; Climate based metrics; Daylighting; Schematic Design; Temporal Maps

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012512097     PISSN: 15502724     EISSN: 15502716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15502724.2008.10747628     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersen M, Kleindienst S, Yi L, Lee J, Bodart M, Cutler B. 2008. An intuitive daylighting performance analysis and optimization approach. Build Res and Inf. In press. [AEC]
2. Architectural Energy Corporation. 2006. Daylighting metric development using daylight autonomy calculations in the Sensor Placement Optimization Tool: developmental report and case studies. Prepared for CHPS daylighting committee, March 17
3. BBC World Weather city guides.2007. Accessed 2007 Dec
4. Bourgeois D, Reinhart CF, Ward G. 2008. A standard daylight coefficient model for dynamic daylighting simulations. Build Res Inf. 36(1):68-82
5. Bund S, Do EYL. 2005. SPOT! Fetch Light Interactive navigable 3D visualization of direct sunlight. Autom Construct. 14(2):181-18
6. Chaiwiwatworakul P, Chirarattananon S. 2004. Evaluation of sky luminance and radiance models using data of north Bangkok. Leukos. 1(2):107-126
7. [CIE] Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage. 1994. Spatial distribution of daylightluminance distributions of various reference skies. Vienna (Austria). CIE. Publication No 110-1994. 30p
8. Cutler B, Sheng Y, Martin S, Glaser D, Andersen M. 2008. Interactive selection of optimal fenestration materials for schematic architectural daylighting design. Autom Construct. 17(7):809-823
9. Glaser D, Feng O, Voung J, Xiao L. 2004. Towards an algebra for lighting simulation. Build Env. 39(8):895-903
10. Herkel S. 1997. Dynamic link of light and thermal simulation: on the way to integrated planning tools. In: Proceedings of 5th IBPSA conf. Prague (Czech Rep), Sept 8-10. pp 307-312
11. Houghton Mifflin Company. World Climate. An outline map of world climates. < http://www.eduplace.com/ss/maps/pdf/world_clim.pdf> Accessed 2007 Dec
12. Igawa N, Nakamura H. 2001. All sky model as a standard sky for the simulation of daylit environment. Build Env. 36(6):763-770
13. Igawa N, Koga Y, Matsuzawa T, Nakamura H., 2004. Models of sky radiance distribution and sky luminance distribution. Solar Energy. 77(2):137-157
14. Littlefair PJ. 1992. Daylight coefficients for practical computation of internal illuminance. Light Res Tech. 24(3):127-135
15. Littlefair PJ. 1994. A comparison of sky luminance models with measured data from Garston, United Kingdom. Solar Energy. 53(4):315-322
16. Mardaljevic J. 1995. Validation of a lighting simulation program under real sky conditions. Light Res Tech. 27:181-188
17. Mardaljevic J. 2003. Precision modeling of parametrically defined solar shading systems: pseudo-changi. Proceedings of 8th IBPSA conf. Eindhoven (Netherlands), Aug 11-14. 823-830
18. Mardaljevic J. 2004. Spatio-temporal dynamics of solar shading for a parametrically defined roof system. Energy Build. 36(8):815-823
19. Mardaljevic J, Nabil A. 2006. The Useful Daylight Illuminance paradigm: A replacement for daylight factors. Energy Build. 38(7):905-913
20. Marion W, Urban K. 1995. User's manual forTMY2s: typical meteorological years. Published by NREL for the US DOE. June 1995: 1-49
21. Marsh A., 2008. Ecotect: thermal analysis. Web help maintained by Square One research Ltd; < http://squ1.com/ecotect/features/thermal> Accessed 2007 Dec
22. Nabil A, Mardaljevic J. 2005. Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Light Res Tech. 37(1):41-57
23. Perez R, Ineichen P, Seals R, Michalsky J, Stewart R. 1990. Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Solar Energy. 44(5):271-289
24. Perez R, Michalsky J, Seals R. 1992. Modeling Sky Luminance Angular distribution for real sky conditions; experimental evaluation of existing algorithms. J Illum Eng Soc. 21(2):84-9
25. Perez R, Seals R, Michalsky J. 1993. All weather model for sky luminance distribution preliminary configuration and validation. Solar Energy. 50(3):235-245
26. Reinhart CF, Herkel S. 2000. The simulation of annual daylight illuminance distributions – a state-of-the-art comparison of six Radiance-based methods. Energy Build. 32(2):167-187
27. Reinhart CF, Walkenhorst O. 2001. Validation of dynamic Radiance-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy Build. 33(7):683-697
28. Reinhart CF. 2005. Tutorial on the use of Daysim/Radiance simulations for sustainable design. Ottawa (Canada): NRC. 111p
29. Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z. 2006. Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos. 3(1):7-31
30. Reinhart CF, Bourgeois D, Dubrous F, Laouadi A, Lopez P, Stelesku O. 2007. Daylight1-2-3 - a state-of-the-art daylighting/energy analysis software for initial design investigations. In: Proceedings of 10th IBPSA conf. Beijing (China), Sept 3-6
31. Tobler W., 1999. World population by latitude. Slide in Unusual Map Projections slideshow. UC Santa Barbara. Used with permission, stylistically reformatted. < http://www.ncgia.ucsb. edu/projects/tobler/Projections/sld075.htm> Accessed 2007 Dec
32. Tregenza PR, Waters IM. 1983. Daylight coefficients. Light Res Tech. 15(2):65-71
33. Tregenza PR. 1987. Subdivision of the sky hemisphere for luminance measurements. Light Res Tech. 19(1):13-14
34. University of Oregon. 2007. Solar Radiation Monitoring Laboratory. Sun path chart program: < http://solardat.uoregon.edu/SunChartProgram.html> Accessed 2007 Dec
35. Ward G, Shakespeare R. 2004. Rendering with Radiance. Revised ed. Davis, CA: Space & Light. 690p
36. Yi L. 2008. A New Approach in Data Visualization to Integrate Time and Space Variability of Daylighting in the Design Process. SMArchS thesis, Department o f Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology