Letters to the Editor: Response to king's comment

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 94, Issue 445, 1999, Pages 352-357

  Freedman, D A ^a   Ostland, M ^a   Roberts, M R ^b   Klein, S P ^c  

^a Department of Statistics ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012509553     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Freedman, D. A., Klein, S. P., Ostland, M., and Roberts, M. R. (1998), “Review of A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 1518-1522.
2. Freedman, D. A., Klein, S. P., Sacks, J., Smyth, C. A., and Everett, C. G. (1991), “Rejoinder,” Evaluation Review, 15, 800-816.
3. Goodman, L. (1953), “Ecological Regression and the Behavior of Individuals,” American Sociological Review, 18, 663-664.
4. Goodman, L. (1959), “Some Alternatives to Ecological Correlation,” American Journal of Sociology, 64, 610-625.
5. Grofman, B. (1991), “Statistics Without Substance,” Evaluation Review, 15, 746-769.
6. King, G. (1997), A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. King, G. (1999), ‘The Future of Ecological Inference Research: A Comment on Freedman et al.,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 352-355.
8. Lichtman, A. (1991), “Passing the Test,” Evaluation Review, 15, 770-799.
9. McCue, K. F. (1998), “Deconstructing King: Statistical Problems in A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem”technical report, California Institute of Technology.
10. Stoto, M. A. (1998), “A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior From Aggregate Data,” Public Health Reports, 113, 182-183.
11. Tam, W. K. (in press), “Iff the Assumption Fits,” Political Analysis, 1.