Information Literacy Integration in a Doctoral Program

Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 115-128

  Grant, Maria ^a   Berg, Marlowe ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ACRL standards; COLD grant program; Doctoral education; Education programs; Information literacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012488502     PISSN: 01639269     EISSN: 15444546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J103v22n01_08     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Alire, Camilla. A. 1984. A nationwide survey of education doctoral students’ attitudes regarding the importance of the library and the need for bibliographic instruction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado.
2. Gibbs, Anita. 1997. Social research update 19: Focus groups [online]. Surrey, England: Department of Sociology, University of Surrey [cited 5 February 2003]. Available World Wide Web http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU19.html.
3. Grafstein, Ann. 2002. A discipline-based approach to information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship28 (4): 197-204.
4. Morner, Claudia J. 1993. A test of library research skills for doctoral students. Doctoral dissertation. Boston College.
5. Murry, John W., Elizabeth C. McKee, and James O. Hammons. 1997. Faculty and librarian collaboration: The road to information literacy for graduate students. Journal on College Teaching8 (2): 107-121.
6. Orr, Debbie, Margaret Appleton, and Margie Wallin. 2001. Information literacy and flexible delivery: Creating a conceptual framework and model. The Journal of Academic Librarianship27 (6): 457-463.
7. Reinking, David et al. (Eds.) 1998. Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic World. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Schlechty, Phillip. 1996. Schools for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.