The changing judicial role: Human rights, community law and the intention of parliament

Cambridge Law Journal

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 487-507

  Mary Arden, Dame ^a  

^a Court of Appeal of England and Wales ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012480212     PISSN: 00081973     EISSN: 14692139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0008197308000640     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984) 467 US 837.
2. R. (Quintavalle) v. Health Secretary [2003] UKHL 13
3. [2003] 2 A.C. 687.
4. Pepper v. Hart [1993] A.C. 593.
5. [2007] C.L.J. 67.
6. [2007] EWCA Civ 13.
7. Civil Procedure Rule 39.3.
8. [2004] UKHL 30
9. [2004] 2 A.C. 557.
10. [2004] UKHL 30, [32]-[33].
11. [2004] UKHL 26
12. [2004] 2 A.C. 323, 350.
13. [1990] 1 A.C. 546.
14. [2006] EWCA Civ 29
15. [2006] S.T.C. 1252. Permission to appeal to the House of Lords was refused.
16. C-456/98 [2000] E.C.R. 1–6007.
17. [2007] EWCA Civ 620.
18. Assanidze v. Georgia App no 71503/01, 8 April 2004.
19. “Auf dem Weg zum Richterstaat?” (2007) 62 Juristen Zeitung, 854–858.