How mental health and welfare to work interact: The role of hope, sanctions, engagement, and support

American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 81-101

  Marrone, Joe ^a   Foley, Susan ^a   Selleck, Virginia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b Minnesota Department of Human Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Employment supports; Mental health; System change; Welfare reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012476561     PISSN: 15487768     EISSN: 15487776     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15487760590953911     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abramowitz, M. (1996). Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present (revised edition). Boston: South End Press.
2. Barusch, A.S. & Taylor, M.J. (1999). Understanding Families with Multiple Barriers to Self Sufficiency: Final Report. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Social Research Institute, (http://www.socwk.utah.edu/finalreport.html).
3. Becker, D.R., Bond, G.R., McCarthy, D., Thompson, D., Xie, H., McHugo, G.J., & Drake, R.E. (2001). Converting day treatment centers to supported employment programs in Rhode Island. Psychiatric Services, 52, 351-357.
4. Beer, M., Eisenstat, R., & Spector, B. (1990). Why change programs don't produce change. Harvard Business Review, November-December, 158-166.
5. Bond, G.R., Becker, D.R., Drake, R.E., Rapp, C.A., Meisler, N., Lehman, A.F., Bell, M.D., & Blyler, C.R. (2001). Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 52(3), 313-322.
6. Carpinello, S.E., Rosenberg, L., Stone, J., Schwager, M., & Felton, C.J. (2002). Best practices: New York State's campaign to implement evidence-based practices for people with serious mental disorders. Psychiatric Services, 53(2), 153-155.
7. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (1998). MMWR: Self-reported frequent mental distress among adults-United States, 1993-1996. May 1, 1998. 47(16), 325-331. Atlanta, GA: Author.
8. Cook, J.A., Carey, M.A., Razzano, L.A., Burke, J., & Blyler, C. (2002). The pioneer: The employment intervention demonstration program. New Directions in Evaluation, 94(1), 31-44.
9. Corrigan, P.W., Steiner, L., McCracken, S.G., Blaser, B., & Barr, M. (2001). Strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to staff who treat people with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52(12), 1598-1606.
10. Danziger, S., Corcoran, M., & Danziger, S. (1999) Barriers to the Employment of Welfare Recipients. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Poverty Research and Training Center (http://www.ssw.umich.edu/poverty/pubs.html).
11. Drake, R.E., Becker, D.B., Biesanz, J.C., Wyzik, P.F., & Torrey, W.C. (1996). Day treatment versus supported employment for persons with severe mental illness: A replication study. Psychiatric services, 47(10), 1125-1126.
12. Drake, R.E., Becker, D.R., Clark, R.E., & Mueser, K.T. (1999). Research on the Individual Placement and Support Model. Psychiatric Quarterly, 70(4), 289-301.
13. Drake, R.E., Goldman, H.H., Leff, H.S., Lehman, A.F., Dixon, L., Mueser, K.T., & Torrey, W.C. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services, 52(2), 179-182.
14. Foley, S.M. (2002). Preliminary findings from national survey of state systems and employment. Paper presented at the Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation, Bethesda, MD.
15. Foley, S., Marrone, J., & Simon, M. (2002) Cruise ships and kayaks: Welfare and rehabilitation approaches for women with disabilities in poverty. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20(6), 659-680.
16. Hagner, D. & Marrone, J. (1993). Funding Employment Under Medicaid Waiver Authority: A Necessity or a Trap? Boston: Institute for Community Inclusion.
17. Hauan, S. & Douglas, S. (2004). Potential Employment Liabilities Among TANF Recipients: A Synthesis of Data from Six State TANF Caseload Studies. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Retrieved from http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/hsp/leavers99/emp-liab04/index.htm.
18. Mank, D. (1994). The underachievement of supported employment: A call for reinvestment. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 5(2), 1-24.
19. Marrone, J. & Golowka, E. (2000). If you think work is bad for people with mental illness, then try poverty, unemployment, and social isolation. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 23(2), 187-193.
20. Marrone, J., Hoff, D., & Gold, M. (1999) Organizational change for community employment. Journal of Rehabilitation, 65(2), 10-19.
21. Minnesota Department of Human Services (1999) Minnesota Family Investment Program Longitudinal Study: Baseline Report. St. Paul: Minnesota Dept. of Human Services.
22. Nightingale, D.S., Pindus, N., & Trutka, J. (2002). The Implementation of the Welfare-To-Work Grants Program. Princton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research Inc.
23. Sanderson, W.C. (2002). Are evidence-based psychological interventions practiced by clinicians in the field? Medscape, Psychiatry & Mental Health Journal 7(1). Available at: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/414948.
24. Sweeney, E.P. (2000) Recent Studies Make Clear that Many Parents Who are Current or Former Welfare Recipients have Disabilities and other Medical Conditions. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
25. United States General Accounting Office (GAO) (2001). Welfare reform: Moving hard to Employ Recipients into the Workforce. GAO-01-368. Washington, DC.
26. United States General Accounting Office (GAO). (2002a). Welfare reform: States are using TANF flexibility to adapt work requirements and time limits to meet state and local needs. Testimony before the subcommittee on Human Resources, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Statement of Cynthia M. Fagnoni, GAO-O2-501T. Washington, DC.
27. United States General Accounting Office (GAO) (2002b). Welfare Reform: More Coordinated Federal Effort Could Help States and Localities Move TANF Recipients With Impairments Toward Employment. GAO-02-37. Washington, DC.
28. VanDeBerg, J. & Grealish, E. (1996). Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5(1), 7-21.
29. Washington Department of Social and Health Services (1998). A Baseline Analysis of TANF One-Parent Families: Findings from 1997 Client Survey. Olympia: State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Economic Services Administration.
30. Zedlewski, S. (1999) Work Activity and Obstacles to Work Among TANF Recipients, Series B, No. B-2. Washington, DC: Urban. Institute (http://www.newfederalism.urban.org/html/seriesb/b2/anf b2.html).
31. Zedlewski, S. (2003). Work and barriers to work among welfare recipients in 2002. Snapshots of America's Families III, Number 3. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.