The question of method in ethics consultation: The irb frontier

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 52-

  Mackay, Charles R ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ETHICIST; ETHICS; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ETHICISTS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS CONSULTATION; ETHICS, RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL ROLE;

EID: 85012473899     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651601317139432     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Agich, G. J. 2001. The question of method in ethics consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 1(4): 31-41.
2. Bell, J., J. Whiton, and S. Connelly. 1998. Evaluation of NIH implementation of section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, mandating a program of protection for research subjects. A report prepared for the Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health. Available from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/newsarchive_ 1998.htm#19980618. 17 July 2001.
3. Clinical Trials Research Group. 2000. Recent articles published by CTRG members. Available from: http://ww2.mcgill.ca/ctrg/ article.html#ethics. 17 July 2001.
4. Freedman, B. 1987. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 317:141-145.
5. MacKay, C. R. 1995. The evolution of the institutional review board: A brief overview of its history, clinical research and regulatory affairs. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs 12(2): 65-94.
6. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.Washington: GPO.