Dramatic science. A critical review of drama in science education

Studies in Science Education

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 75-102

  Ødegaard, Marianne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012472084     PISSN: 03057267     EISSN: 19408412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057260308560196     Document Type: Note

References (92)

1. AIKENHEAD, G. (1996). Border crossings into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52.
2. AIKENHEAD, G. & JEGEDE, O.J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: a cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research and Science Teaching, 36, 269-288.
3. ALTERS, B.J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 39-55.
4. ARNOLD, M., & MILLAR, R. (1996). Learning the scientific ‘story’: A case study in the teaching and learning of elementary thermodynamics. Science Education, 80, 249-281.
5. BAILEY, S. (1994). The Ecogame. Risley, Warrington, Cheshire: BNFL Education Unit.
6. BAILEY, S., & WATSON, R. (1998). Establishing basic ecological understanding in younger pupils: a pilot evaluation of a strategy based on drama/role play. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 139-152.
7. BAIRD, C. (1997). ‘GULP’ an imaginatively different approach to learning about water, through science drama. Education in Science, 171, 30-31.
8. BAKER, D. (2002) Where is gender and equity in science education? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 659-663.
9. BARTON, A.C., (2002). Urban science education studies: a commitment to equity, social justice and a sense of place. Studies in Science Education, 38, 1-37.
10. BOAL, A. (1977). For en frigorande teater. Uppsala, Sweden: Gidlunds.
11. BOAL, A. (1998). Legislative theatre. London: Routledge.
12. BRAUND, M. (1999). Electric drama to improve understanding in science. School Science Review, 81, 35-41.
13. BRICKHOUSE, N. (2001). Embodying science: a feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282-295.
14. BRONOWSKI, J. (1975). Science and human values (Revised edition). New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1956).
15. BROUWER, W. (1990). The scientist in society: perspectives from drama. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 9, 259-296.
16. BROWN, V., & PLEYDELL, S. (1999). The dramatic difference. Drama in preschool and kindergarten classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. BRUNER, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. BYAM, L.D. (1999). Community in motion. Theatre for development in Africa. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
19. CARLSSON, B. (2002). “Jag vill vara kol!—ett fotosyntetiskt dramaspel”. Miljodidaktiska texter, Lararutbildningen, Malmo Hogskola, 4, 10-27.
20. CATTERMOLE, H. (2002). Editorial of science and theatre. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 27, 161-162.
21. CHRISTOFI, C., & DAVIES, M. (1991). Science through drama. Education in Science, 141, 28-29.
22. COBERN, W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80, 579-610.
23. CRAWFORD, E. (1999). Drama in science teaching—comedy tragedy or documentary. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Science Education (ASE) in Reading, UK.
24. CRUZ, S. M. & ZYLBERSZTAJN, A. (2002). Event centered learning facing interdisciplinary problems. Proceedings of 10th IOSTE Symposium, 2, 828-833.
25. DALTON, R. (2001). The curtain falls. Nature, 414, 685.
26. DTERASSI, C. (2002). Contemporary ‘science-in-theatre’: a rare genre. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 27, 193-201.
27. DORF, H. (1994). Konflikttaenkning og konfliktbehandling i undervisningen. In S. Breiting (ed.), Miljoundervisning i Nor den. Erfaringer fra de forste MUVIN-skoler i Danmark. Skrifter fra Forskningssenter for Miljo- og Sundhedsundervisning nr. 27. Danmarks Laererhojskole.
28. DUSCHL, R.A. & OSBORNE, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
29. DUVEEN, J., & SOLOMON, J. (1994). The great evolution trial: Use of role-play in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 575-582.
30. EIK, L.T. (1999). Storyline. Oslo: TanowAschehoug
31. EVALUATION ASSOCIATES LTD. (1998 March). Cracked evaluation. Buckingham, UK: Author.
32. FREIRE, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
33. FRIEDMAN, R.M. (2002). ‘Rumbaing Miss Meitner’: an attempt to forge history into drama. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 27, 202-210.
34. FULLER, S. (1988). Social epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
35. GIROUX, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals : toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Granby, Mass.: Bergin & Garvey.
36. HEATHCOTE, D., & BOLTON, G. (1995). Drama for learning. Portmouth, NH : Heinemann.
37. HENRY, M. (2000). Drama’s ways of learning. Research in Drama Education, 5, 45-62.
38. HOWES, E.V. (2002). Connecting girls and science. New York: Teachers College Press.
39. JACKSON, T. (ed.) (1993). Learning through theatre : new perspectives on Theatre in Education. London : Routledge
40. JANIS, I.L. (1968). Attitude change via role playing. In R.P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W.J. McGuire, T.M. Newcomb, M.J. Rosenberg, & P.H. Tannenbaum, (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: a sourcebook (pp.810-818). Chicago: Rand McNally.
41. JENKINS, E. (1994). Public understanding of science and science education for action. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 601-611.
42. JENKINS, E. (1996). The ‘nature of science’ as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 137-150.
43. KAMEN, M. (1991). Use of creative drama to evaluate elementary school students’ understanding of science concepts. In G. Kulm & S.M. Malcom (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp.338-341). Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
44. KAMEN, M. (1996). A teacher’s implementation of authentic assessment in an elementary science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 859-877.
45. KASE-POLISINI, J., & SPECTOR, B. (1992). Improvised drama: A tool for teaching science. Youth Theatre Journal, 7, 15-19.
46. KERR, M.M., & MACDONALD, T.H. (1997). Project 2000 student nurses’ creative approach to peer education. Nurse Education Today, 17, 247-254.
47. KNAIN, E. (1999a). Naturfagets tause stemme. Diskursanalyse av Icereboker for Natur- og miljofag i et allmenndannelsesperspektiv. Doctoral dissertation [Dr.scient-avhandling], University of Oslo, Norway.
48. KNAIN, E. (1999b). Sense and sensibility in science education: Developing rational beliefs through cultural approaches. Studies in Science Education, 33, 1-29.
49. KOLSTØ, S. (1997). Naturvitenskap og demokrati: Hva kan skolefaget bidra med? In E. Kallerud, & S. Sjøberg, (Eds.), Vitenskap, teknologi og allmenndannelse. Innlegg om viten-skap og teknologi i skole, medier og opinion (pp. 67-92). Rapport 10/97, Oslo: Utredningsinstituttet for forskning og hoyere utdanning.
50. KYLE, W.C., Jr. (1991). The reform agenda and science education: Hegemonic control vs. counterhegemony. Science Education, 75, 403-411.
51. KYLE, W.C., Jr. (1997). Assessing students’ understandings of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 851-852.
52. KYLE, W.C. Jr. (1999). Science education in developing countries: access, equity, and ethical responsibility. Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, 3, 1-13.
53. KYLE, W.C. Jr. (1999). Science education in developing countries: access, equity, and ethical responsibility. Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, 3, 1-13.
54. KYLE, W. C., Jr. (2003). The road from Rio to Johannesburg: where are the footpaths to/from science education? Invited presentation at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11-15 January 2003, Kamhlaba, Swaziland.
55. LEACH, J. & SCOTT, P. (in press). Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education. Science and Education.
56. LEMKE, J. (1990). Talking science. Language, learning and values. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
57. LEMKE, J. (2001). Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296-316.
58. LINFIELD, R.S., (1996). Can scientific understanding be assessed through drama? Primary Science Review, 45, 4-5.
59. LITTLEDYKE, M., ROSS, K. & LAKIN, L. (2000). Science knowledge and the environment. A guide for students and teachers in primary education. London: David Fulton.
60. LUSTIG, H. & SHEPHARD-BARR, K. (2002). Science as theatre. American Scientist, 90, 550-555.
61. LYNCH, S. (2001). Science for all is not equal to one size fits all. Linguistic and cultural diversity and science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 622-627.
62. METCALFE, R.J.A., ABBOTT, S., BRAY, P., EXLEY, J. & WISNIA, D. (1984). Teaching science through drama: an empirical investigation. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2, 77-81.
63. NILSEN, B.S. (1986). Undring. Om rollespill som pedagogisk virkemiddel i problematiseringsarbeid. Master’s thesis. Institute for Drama, Film, Theatre. University of Trondheim, Norway.
64. NYGAARD, J. (1997). Det europeiske forste teaterm0te. Spillerom. 3, 8-17.
65. ØDEGAARD, M. (1999). Drama i miljoundervisningen. Et mote med virkeligheten. The 4. Nordic research symposium on environmental education. Roros, 7.-10. juni 1999.
66. ØDEGAARD, M. (2001). The drama of science education. How public understanding of biotechnology and drama as a learning activity may enhance a critical and inclusive science education. Dr.scient. dissertation, University of Oslo
67. ØDEGAARD, M., AND KYLE, W. C., Jr. (2000, April). Imagination and critical reflection: Cultivating a vision of scientific literacy. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. (Paper III contained within Dr.scient. dissertation The drama of science education by M. Ødegaard (2001), University of Oslo)
68. ØDEGAARD, M. & ØIESTAD, P.A. (2002). ‘Gen-Gangere’. Exploring the borderland of knowledge, biotechnology and Henrik Ibsen's dramatic world. Drama Australia Journal. 26, 91-101
69. OGBORN, J., KRESS, G., MARTINS, I., & MCGILLICUDDY, K. (1996). Explaining science in the classroom. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
70. OSBORNE, J. (1997, Sept.). Science education for the future—The road ahead? Paper presented at European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Rome, Italy.
71. O’TOOLE, J. (1976). Theatre in education : new objectives for theatre—new techniques in education. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
72. PALMER, D.H. (2000). Using dramatizations to present science concepts. Journal of College Science Teaching, (Dec.1999/Jan.2000), 187-190.
73. RASMUSSEN, B. (2001). Meninger i mellom—perspektiv pa en dramatisk kulturarena. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
74. RISEBOROUGH, R. (1993). The use of drama in health education. Nursing Standard, 7, 30-32.
75. SANDBERG, P., & KRAFT, N. (1996). Kvikklaks og teknoburger: sluttrapport fra Lekfolkskonferansen om genmodifisert mat. Oslo, Norway: De nasjonale forskningsetiske komiteer.
76. SCHAFFNER, M., LITTLE, G., FELTON, H., & PARSONS, B. (1984). Drama, language and learning. Reports of the drama and language research project. Speech and Drama Center, Education Department of Tasmania. NADIE Papers No. 1. Tasmania: National Association for Drama in Education.
77. SHAMOS, M.A. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
78. SHOR, I. (1992). Empowering education. Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79. SINNES, A., ØDEGAARD, M. (2003, May) We have a dream… Visjoner om naturfag og endring. Paper presented at the Nordic seminar: Naturfagdidaktikk. Perspektiver, Forskning, Utvikling. Oslo, Norway.
80. SJØBERG, S. (1997, May). Science education. Some perspectives from current research and reflection. Keynote Address to OECD seminar, Oslo, Norway.
81. SJØBERG, S. (1998). Naturfag som allmenndannelse: En kritisk Fagdidaktikk. Oslo, Norway: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
82. SNOW, C.R (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83. SOLOMON J. (1990). The retrial of Galileo. SATIS 16-19. Vol.l, Hatfield: ASE.
84. SOLOMON, J., DUVEEN, J., SCOTT, L., & MCCARTHY, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 409-421.
85. STINNER, A. (1995). Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education. Science Education, 79, 555-581.
86. SUTTON, C. (1996). Beliefs about science and beliefs about language. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 1-18.
87. SZATKOWSKI, J. (1985). Nar kunst kan brukes. In J. Szatkowski & C.B.M. Jensen (Eds.), Dramapedagogikk II i Nordisk perspektiv (pp.136-182). Grasten, Denmark: Teater-forlaget Drama.
88. TVEITA, J. (1996). The drama model of electricity. Paper presented at the 8th IOSTE Symposium, Edmonton, Canada.
89. TVEITA, J. (1998). Can untraditional learning methods used in physics help girls to be more interested and achieve more in this subject? In E. Torracca (Ed.) Research in Science Education in Europe (pp. 1-7). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
90. VARGAS, G. (1995). Econauts: Mission Nature. Radio drama for environmental education in Cost Rica. LearnTech Case Study Series No. 5.
91. WATTS, M., ALSOP, S., ZYLBERSZTAJN, A., & DE SILVA, S.M. (1997). ‘Event-centred- learning’: An approach to teaching science technology and societal issues in two countries. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 341-351.
92. WOLPERT, L. (1998, April 19). The play’s the thing. Independent on Sunday.