An analysis of residential location choice behaviour in oxfordshire, uk: A combined stated preference approach

International Review of Public Administration

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 103-114

  Kim, Jae Hong ^a   Pagliara, Francesca ^b   Preston, John ^c  

^a University of Ulsan   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Housing development; Residential location choice; Stated preference

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012468331     PISSN: 12294659     EISSN: 2331795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2003.10805021     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ben-Akiva, M. and R. R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand Modeling. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
2. Brasington, D. M. 2002. “The demand for local public goods: the case of public school quality.” Public Finance Review 30: 163-187.
3. Brasington, D. M. 2000. “Demand and supply of public school quality in metropolitan area: the role of private schools.” Journal of Regional Science 40 (3): 583-605.
4. Cervero, R. and J. Landis. 1997. “Twenty years of the bay area rapid transit system: land use and development impacts.” Transportation Research A 31: 309-333.
5. Cooper, J., Ryley, T. and A. Smith. 2001. “Energy trade-offs and market responses in transport and residential land-use patterns: promoting sustainable development policy and pitfalls.” Urban Studies 38: 1573-1588.
6. DeShanzo, J. R. and G. Fermo. 2002. “Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 123-143.
7. DTLR. 1998. Transport Economics Note, internal report. Department of Transport, Local Government and Region, UK.
8. Earnhart, D. 2002. “Combining revealed and stated data to examine housing decisions using discrete choice analysis.” Journal of Urban Economics 51: 143-169.
9. Eliasson, J., Lindqvist Dillen, J. and J. Widell. 2002. “Measuring intrusion valuations through stated preferences and hedonic prices a comparative study.” Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Cambridge, UK.
10. Fielder, J. A. 1972. “Condominium design and pricing: a case study in consumer trade-off analysis.” Presented at the 3rd Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, Chicago, US.
11. Forrest, D., Glenn, J. and R. Ward. 1996. “The impact of a light rail system on the structure of house prices.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 30: 15-30.
12. Gayda, S. 1998. “Stated preference survey on residential location choice in Brussels.” Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerpen, Belgium.
13. Goodman, A. C. and T. G. Thibodeau. 1998. “Housing market segmentation.” Journal of Housing Economics 16: 131-143.
14. Haig, R. M. 1926. “Towards an understanding of the metropolis.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 40: 179-208.
15. Hensher, D. A. 1994. “Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practise.” Transportation 21: 107-133.
16. Hunt, J. D., McMillan, J. D. P. and J. E. Abraham. 1994. “Stated preference investigation of influences on attractiveness of residential locations.” Transportation Research Record 1466: 79-87.
17. Kaysi, I. A. and J. H. Abed. 2001. “Residential location choice in post-war Beirut: implications for urban development and travel pattern.” Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Transport Research. Seoul, Korea.
18. Keller, K. L. and R. Staelin. 1987. “Effects of quality and quantity of information on decision and effectiveness.” Journal of Consumer Research 14: 2002 13.
19. Knight, R. L. and M. D. Menchick. 1976. “Conjoint preference estimation for residential land use policy evaluation.” In Spatial Choice and Spatial Behaviour. edited by Golledge and Rushton. Ohio State University Press, Columbus: 135-155.
20. Kocur, G., Alder, T., Hyman, W. and B. Audet. 1982. Guide to forecasting travel demand with direct utility assessment. US Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Report UMTA-NH-11-0001-82-1. Washington D C.
21. Leitham, S, McQuaid, R. W. and J. D. Nelson. 2000. “The influence of transport on industrial location choice: a stated preference experiment.” Transportation ResearchA 34: 515-535.
22. Louviere, J.J, Hensher, D. A. and J. D. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Oxfordshire County Council. 2002. Oxfordshire Planning Our Future. Oxfordshire, UK.
24. Pagliara, F., Preston, J. and J. H. Kim. 2002. “Modelling residential location choice behaviour.” Proceedings of the European Transport Conference. Cambridge, UK.
25. Sermons, W. and F. Koppleman. 1998. “Factor analytic approach to incorporating systematic taste variation into models of residential location choice.” Transportation Research Record 1617: 194-202.
26. Simmonds, D. C. and A. Skinner. 2001. “The Trans-Pennine corridor model.” Proceedings of the European Transport Conference. Cambridge, UK.
27. Walker, B., Marsh, A., Wardman, M. and P. Niner. 2002. “Modelling tenants’ choices in the public rented sector: a stated preference approach.” Urban Studies 39: 665-688.
28. Wardman, M. 1998. “The value of time a review of British evidence.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 32: 285-316.
29. Wheaton, W. C. 1977. “A bid rent approach to housing demand.” Journal of Urban Economics 4: 2002 17.