Teaching in natural areas: What urban teachers feel is most appropriate

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 149-157

  Simmons, Deborah ^a  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012433279     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1350462960020202     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Cantrell, D., 1987. A case study analysis of curriculum implementation as exemplified by Project WILD in one midwestern state, 426Ohio State University. PhD dissertation
2. Disinger, J., 1993. “ Environment in the K-12 curriculum: an overview ”. In Environmental Education Teacher Resource Handbook, Edited by: Wilke, R., Milwood, NY: Kraus International Publications.
3. Ham, S., and Sewing, D., 1987-1988. Barriers to environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 19(2): 17–24.
4. Hungerford, H., 1975. Myths of environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2): 21–26.
5. Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S., 1989. The Experience of Nature, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6. Simmons, D., 1989. More infusion confusion: a look at environmental education curriculum materials. Journal of Environmental Education, 20(4): 15–18.
7. Simmons, D., 1993. Facilitating teachers’ use of natural areas: perceptions of environmental education opportunities. Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3): 8–16.
8. Stapp, W.B., From Ought to Action in Environmental Education: a report of the national leadership conference on environmental education. SMEAC Information Reference Center. Columbus, OH.
9. Tanner, T., 1974. Conceptual and instructional issues in environmental education today. Journal of Environmental Education, 5(4): 48–53.