Strategies for distance education: Lessons learned from inside and outside the university

Gerontology and Geriatrics Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 115-130

  Teaster, Pamela B ^a,b   Roberto, Karen A ^b  

^a Department of Human Development and State Extension Specialist ^*  (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012429324     PISSN: 02701960     EISSN: 15453847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J021v21n01_09     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Blumenstyk, G. (1996). Faculty group calls for caution and cures on distance education. Chronicle of Higher Education, 42 (20), p. A20.
2. Gilbert, S. (1995). Why distance education? American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 1, 4.
3. Holmberg, B. (1993). Key issues in distance education: An academic viewpoint. In K. Harry, M. John, & D. Keegan (Eds.), Distance education: New perspectives (pp. 330-341). London: Routledge.
4. McIsaac, M., & Gunawardena, C. (1996). Distance education. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 403-437). New York: Simon & Schuster.
5. Schneider, E., Glass, S., Henke, M., & Overton, J. (1997). Distance learning in Gerontology: The future is here. Generations, 21 (3), 46-49.
6. Teaster, P. B. & Roberto K. A. (1998a). Extension evaluation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Center for Gerontology.
7. Teaster, P. B. & Roberto, K. A. (1998b). Class evaluation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Center for Gerontology.
8. University of Wisconsin Biomedical Computing Group (1996). NetForum. [Online]. Available: Http://www.medsch.wisc.edu.netforum