Evaluating textbooks: The role of genre analysis

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 35-43

  Kearsey, John ^a   Turner, Sheila ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BEDFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85012429179     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0263514990170103     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Blackburne, L., 1995. A right to say the wrong thing. Times Educational Supplement,: 8
2. Cameron, D., 1995. Verbal Hygiene, London: Routledge.
3. Couture, B., 1986. “ Effective ideation in written text: a functional approach to clarity and exigence ”. In Functional Approaches to Writing: research perspectives, Edited by: Couture, B., 69-92. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Department for Education and Employment. 1998a. The National Literacy Strategy: framework for teaching, London: DfEE.
5. Department for Education and Employment. 1998b. The Learning Age; a renaissance for a new Britain, London: DfEE.
6. Edwards, D., and Mercer, N., 1987. Common Knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom, London: Routledge.
7. Halliday, M.A.K., 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning, London: Edward Arnold.
8. Halliday, M.A.K., and Hasan, R., 1989. Language, Context, and Text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Halliday, M.A.K., and Martin, J.R., 1993. Writing Science: literacy and discursive power, London: The Falmer Press.
10. Hofkins, D., 1995. Bid to realign GCSE exam marking. Times Educational Supplement.
11. Kearsey, J.M.B., 1997. The accessibility of school science textbooks to bilingual students London unpublished PhD thesis
12. Kress, G.R., 1985. Socio-linguistic Development and the Mature Language User: different voices for different occasions, London: The Falmer Press.
13. Lemke, J.L., 1989. Using Language in the Classroom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Martin, J.R., 1985. “ Process and text: two aspects of human semiosis ”. In Systematic Perspectives on Discourse, Edited by: Benson, J.D., and Greaves, W.S., vol. 1, 247-274. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
15. Midland Examining Group. 1993. Nuffield Co-ordinated Sciences: double award syllabus code 1772. 1995 Examination Syllabus, Nottingham, Cambridge: Birmingham, Midland Examining Group.
16. Morris, A., and Stewart-Dore, N., 1984. Learning to Read from Text: effective reading in the content areas, North Ryde, NSW: Addison-Wesley.
17. Nuffield Chelsea Curriculum Trust. 1988. Nuffield Co-ordinated Sciences: biology, Harlow: Longman.
18. Nuffield Chelsea Curriculum Trust. 1992-1994. Pathways Through Science, London: Longman.
19. Nwogu, K.N., 1991. Structure of science popularizations: a genre-analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts. English for Specific Purposes, 10: 111-123.
20. Open University. 1987. Unit 16, The development of understanding in the classroom, Milton Keynes: The Open University.
21. Richards, J., 1978. Classroom Language; what sort?, London: Allen & Unwin.
22. School Curriculum and Assessment Authority. 1995. Children's Use of Spoken Standard English, London: SCAA.
23. Stubbs, M., 1983. Discourse Analysis: the sociolinguistic analysis of natural language, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24. Swales, J.M., 1981. Aspects of Article Introductions, Birmingham: University of Aston.
25. Swales, J.M., 1990. Genre Analysis: English in research settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Tonjes, M., 1981. “ Using advance organisers to enhance the processing of text ”. In The Reader and the Text, Edited by: Chapman, L.J., London: Heinemann Educational.
27. Torbe, M., and Medway, P., 1981. Language Teaching and Learning: the climate for learning, London: Ward Lock Educational.