Assessing the Adequacy of Small Solute Clearance for Various Dialysis Modalities, with Inclusion of Residual Native Kidney Function

Seminars in Dialysis

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 235-240

  Chin, Andrew I ^a   Depner, Thomas A ^a   Daugirdas, John T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CREATININE; UREA;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY; METABOLISM; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

BIOMARKERS; CREATININE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RENAL DIALYSIS; UREA;

EID: 85012266675     PISSN: 08940959     EISSN: 1525139X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12584     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. van Olden RW, van Acker BA, Koomen GC, Krediet RT, Arisz L: Time course of inulin and creatinine clearance in the interval between two haemodialysis treatments. Nephrol Dial Transplant 10:2274–2280, 1995
2. Daugirdas JT: Estimating weekly urine flow rate and residual kidney urea clearance: a method to deal with interdialytic variability. Semin Dial 29:510–514, 2016
3. Daugirdas JT: Estimating time-averaged serum urea nitrogen concentration during various urine collection periods: a prediction equation for thrice weekly and biweekly dialysis schedules. Semin Dial 29:507–509, 2016
4. National Kidney Foundation: KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Hemodialysis Adequacy: 2015 update. Am J Kidney Dis 66: 884–930, 2015
5. Tattersall J, Martin-Malo A, Pedrini L, Basci A, Canaud B, Fouque D, et al.: EBPG guideline on dialysis strategies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22(Suppl 2):ii5–ii21, 2007
6. Depner TA: Benefits of more frequent dialysis: lower TAC at the same Kt/V. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13(Suppl 6):20–24, 1998
7. Gotch FA: The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13(Suppl 6):10–14, 1998
8. Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Van Stone JC: The peak concentration hypothesis: a urea kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 9:257–260, 1989
9. Leypoldt JK: Urea standard Kt/V(urea) for assessing dialysis treatment adequacy. Hemodial Int 8:193–197, 2004
10. Depner TA: Daily hemodialysis efficiency: an analysis of solute kinetics. Adv Ren Replace Ther 8:227–235, 2001
11. Sargent JA, Gotch FA: The analysis of concentration dependence of uremic lesions in clinical studies. Kidney Int Suppl 2:35–44, 1975
12. Daugirdas JT, Depner TA, Greene T, Levin NW, Chertow GM, Rocco MV; Frequent Hemodialysis Network Trial Group: Standard Kt/Vurea: a method of calculation that includes effects of fluid removal and residual kidney clearance. Kidney Int 77:637–644, 2010
13. Tattersall JE, DeTakats D, Chamney P, Greenwood RN, Farrington K: The post-hemodialysis rebound: predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int 50:2094–2102, 1996
14. Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Depner TA, Leypoldt J, Gotch F, Schulman G, et al. Hemodialysis Study Group: Factors that affect postdialysis rebound in serum urea concentration, including the rate of dialysis: results from the HEMO Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:194–203, 2004
15. Gotch FA: Kinetic modeling in hemodialysis. In: Nissenson AR, Gentile DE, Fine RN (eds). Clinical Dialysis, 2nd edn. Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1990:118–146
16. Depner TA: Prescribing Hemodialysis: A Guide to Urea Modeling. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991
17. Hemodialysis Adequacy Work Group: Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy, update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis 48(Suppl 1):S2–S90, 2006
18. Agarwal M, Clinard P, Burkart JM: Combined peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: our experience compared to others. Perit Dial Int 23:157–161, 2003
19. Suzuki H, Hoshi H, Inoue T, Kikuta T, Tsuda M, Takenaka T: Combination therapy with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Contrib Nephrol 177:71–83, 2012
20. Daugirdas JT, Depner TA, Greene T, Silisteanu P: Solute-solver: a web-based tool for modeling urea kinetics for a broad range of hemodialysis schedules in multiple patients. Am J Kidney Dis 54:798–809, 2009
21. Daugirdas JT: Solute solver ‘what if?’ module for modeling urea kinetics. Nephrol Dial Transplant 31:1934–1937, 2016
22. Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN; CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group: Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: a reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 2158–2162, 2001
23. Termorshuizen F, Dekker FW, vanManen JG, Korevaar JC, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT; NECOSAD Study Group: Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialysis patients: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1061–1070, 2004