Architecting models of technical systems for non-routine simulations

Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED

Volumn DS 31, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Sellgren, Ulf ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Complexity; Interface; Model structure matrix; Modularity; Physical behavior

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; COST ENGINEERING; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); PROBLEM SOLVING;

COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT; COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER-BASED MODELS; DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRICES; MODEL STRUCTURE MATRIXES; MODULARITY; PERFORMANCE AND RELIABILITIES; PHYSICAL BEHAVIORS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 85012257303     PISSN: 22204334     EISSN: 22204342     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Whitney, D. E., 1996, "Why mechanical design cannot be like VLSI design", Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 8, 1996, pp. 125-128.
2. Boisot, M. H., "Is your firm a creative destroyer? Competitive learning and knowledge flows in the technological strategies of firms", Research Policy, Vol. 24, 1995, pp. 489-506.
3. Sellgren, U., "Simulation-driven design: motives, means, and opportunities", Doctoral thesis, Department of Machine Design, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.
4. Ross, D. T.," "Structured analysis (SA): A language for comunicating ideas", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-3, No. 1, 1977, pp. 16-34.
5. Breedveld, P. C., "Physical systems theory in therms of bond graphs", Ph. D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, 1984.
6. Pimmler, T. U. and Eppinger, S. D., "Integration analysis of product decompositions", ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, DE Vol. 68, 1994.
7. Malmström, J, Pikosz, P. and Malmqvist, J., "The complementary roles of IDEF0 and DSM for the modeling of information management processes", Advances in Concurrent Engineering - CE'98, Tokyo, Japan, 1998.
8. Grohmann, B., Konstanzer, P., Lay, A., Wallmersperger, T., Kröplin, B., "On the principle of adaptive structure systems", NAFEMS Seminar: Finite Element Application for Adaptive Structural Systems, Nov. 11-12, Ref. R0068, 1998, NAFEMS, UK.
9. http://www.Scania.se, 2000.
10. Peak, R. S., Scholand, A., et al., "On the routinization of analysis for physical design", ASME International Engineering Congress and Exposition, 1996, pp. 73-82.
11. Sellgren, U. and Drogou, R., "Behavior modeling in mechanical engineering: A modular approach", Engineering with Computers, Vol. 14, 1985, pp. 185-196.
12. Steward, DV, "The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. EM-28, No. 3, 1981, pp. 71-74.
13. Smith, RP and Eppinger, SD, "Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration", Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 3, 1997, pp. 276-293.
14. Blackenfelt M., "Managing complexity by product modularisation", Doctoral thesis, Department of Machine Design, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2001.
15. http://www.volvoce.com, 2003.
16. http://www.fedem.com, 2003.
17. Craig, R. R. and Bampton, M. C. C., "Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis", AAIA Journal, Vol. 6, No. 7, 1968, pp. 1313-1319.